Long-Term Thermal Conductivity Prediction of Polyurethane Foam Applying Precision Mass Spectrometer for Cell Gas Analysis

정밀질량분석기를 활용한 우레탄폼의 장기열전도도 예측을 위한 분석기법

  • Kim, Jin-Seok (Division of Quality Life, Korea Research of Standard and Science) ;
  • Chun, Jong-Han (Division of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Bok (Division of Quality Life, Korea Research of Standard and Science) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Jin (Department of Buiding Service Engineering, Hanbat National University)
  • 김진석 (한국표준과학연구원 삶의질표준본부) ;
  • 전종한 (한밭대학교 응용생명공학부) ;
  • 이진복 (한국표준과학연구원 삶의질표준본부) ;
  • 이효진 (한밭대학교 건축설비공학과)
  • Received : 2009.10.21
  • Published : 2010.10.10

Abstract

A proprietary device is adopted to break out the membrane of cell in the rigid polyurethane foam. As it is known, the membrane of cell is hardly tearing-off thoroughly in a mechanical way due to both its elastic characteristic and micro sized pores. In this study, a novel experimental approach is introduced to burst out all gases inside the cells of the rigid polyurethane foam by abrasively grinding micro-cells completely into fine powder. The biggest advantage of this approach is to be capable of releasing all gases out from the cell even in the micro pores. As clearly reflected from the repeatability, the accuracy of the result is highly improved and high confidence in the data sets as well. For the measurements of not only gas composition but partial pressure for each gas simultaneously as well, a precision gas mass spectrometer is used in-line directly to the abrasive grinding device. To control the starting point of the polyurethane foam, all samples were prepared on site in the laboratory. Manufactured time is one of the most critical factors in characterization of cell gas composition because it is known that one of gas composition, especially, carbon dioxide, is diffused out dramatically in a short period of time as soon as it is foamed.

Keywords

References

  1. KEMCO, 2009, 2009 Energy Saving Statistic Handbook.
  2. Jarfelt, U. and Ramnas, O., 2006, Thermal Conductivity of Polyurethane Foam-Best Performance, 10th International Symposium on Distirct Heating and Cooling.
  3. Modesti, M., Lorenzetti, A. and Dall'Acqua, C., 2005, Long-term performance of environmentally-friendly blown polyurethane poams, Polymer Engineering and Science, pp. 260-269.
  4. Holman, J. P., 1981, Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  5. Alvarez-Lainez, M., Rodriguez-Perez, M. A., and DE Saja, J. A., 2008, Thermal Conductivity of Open-Cell Polyolefin Foams, J. of Polymer Science:Part B:Polymer Physics, Vol. 46, pp. 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1002/polb.21358
  6. Mozgowiec, M. D., 1990, The use of small cells to reduce radiation heat transfer in foam Insulation, M. S. Thesis, MIT.
  7. Morenzo, J. D., 1991, Radiative transfer and thermal performance levels in foam insulation board stocks, M. S. Thesis, MIT.
  8. Boetes, R., 1986, Heat transfer reduction in closed cell polyurethane foams, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Delft, Netherlands.
  9. European Standard EN 12524, 1997, Building materials and products-Energy related properties-tabulated design values.
  10. Mason, E. A. and Saxena, S. C., 1958, An approximate formula for the thermal conductivity of multicomponent gas Mixtures. Phys. of Fluids, Vol. 1, No. 5, pp. 361-369. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1724352