Predictive Model Selection of Disinfection by-products (DBPs) in D Water Treatment Plant

D 정수장 소독부산물 예측모델 선정

  • Kim, Sung-Joon (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyeong-Won (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Hwang, Jeong-Seok (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Won, Chan-Hee (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2009.11.26
  • Accepted : 2010.03.14
  • Published : 2010.05.30

Abstract

For D-WTP's sedimentation basin and distribution reservoir, and water tap the predictive models proposed tentatively herein included the models for estimating TTHM concentration in precipitated water, for treated water and for tap water, and the estimated correlation formula between treated water's TTHM concentration and tap water. As for TTHM-concentration predictive model in sedimentation water, the coefficient of determination is 0.866 for best-fitted short-term $DOC{\times}UV_{254}$ based Model (TTHM). As for $HAA_5$-concentration predictive model in sedimentation water, the coefficient of determination is 0.947 for the suitable $UV_{254}$-based model ($HAA_5$). In case of the predictive model in treated water, the coefficient of determination is 0.980 for best-fitted $DOC{\times}UV_{254}$ based model (TTHM) using coagulated waters, while the coefficient of determination is 0.983 for best-fitted $DOC{\times}UV_{254}$ based model ($HAA_5$) using coagulated waters, which described the $HAA_5$ concentration well. However, the predictive model for tap water could not be compatible with the one for treated water, only except for possibility inducing correlation formula for prediction, [i.e., the correlation formula between TTHM concentration and tap water was verified as TTHM (tap water) = $1.162{\times}TTHM$ (treated water), while $HAA_5$ (tap water) = $0.965{\times}HAA_5$ (treated water).] The correlation analysis between DOC and $KMnO_4$ consumption by process resulted in higher relationship with filtrated water, showing that its regression is $DOC=0.669{\times}KMnO_4$ consumption - 0.166 with 0.689 of determination coefficient. By substituting it to the existing DOC-based model ($HAA_5$) for treated water, the consequential model formula was made as follows; $HAA_5=8.35(KMnO_4\;consumption{\times}0.669-0.166)^{0.701}(Cl_2)^{0.577}t^{0.150}0.9216^{(pH-7.5)}1.022^{(Temp-20^{\circ}C)}$

Keywords

References

  1. 신초롱, 손진식, 정창호, 한지희(2007). 국내 정수장 유출수 소독부산물(THMs와 HAAs)의 상관관계 연구. 공동추계학술발표회 논문집, 대한상하수도학회.한국물환경학회, pp. 202-208.
  2. 이동석, 민병섭, 박선구, 김정화, 류재근(2004). 정수장에서 소독부산물의 생성특성. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 20(1), pp. 55-62.
  3. Amy, G., Siddiqui, M., Ozekin, K., Zhu, H. W., and Wang, C. (1998). Empirically based models for predicting chlorination and ozonation by-product: haloacetic acids, chloral hydrate, and bromate. EPA Report CX, 819579.
  4. Zhu, H. W. (1996). Modeling the effects of coagulation on chlorination by-product formation. University of Colorado, Ph D thesis.