디지털산업정보학회논문지 (Journal of Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management)

  • 제6권1호
  • /
  • Pages.91-103
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1738-6667(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-9018(eISSN)
디지털산업정보학회 (Korea Society of Digital Industry and Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지식 거래 서비스를 위한 규칙기반 시맨틱 검색 기법

Rule-based Semantic Search Techniques for Knowledge Commerce Services

  • 송성광 (창원대학교 컴퓨터공학과) ;
  • 김영지 (하이브레인넷 부설연구소) ;
  • 우용태 (창원대학교 컴퓨터공학과)
  • 투고 : 2009.12.08
  • 심사 : 2010.01.21
  • 발행 : 2010.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper introduces efficient rule-based semantic search techniques to ontology-based knowledge commerce services. Primarily, the search techniques presented in this paper define rules of reasoning that are required for users to search using the concept of ontology, multiple characteristics, relations among concepts and data type. In addition, based on the defined rules, the rule-based reasoning techniques search ontology for knowledge commerce services. This paper explains the conversion rules of query which convert user's query language into semantic search words, and transitivity rules which enable users to search related tags, knowledge products and users. Rule-based sematic search techniques are also presented; these techniques comprise knowledge search modules that search ontology using validity examination of queries, query conversion modules for standardization and expansion of search words and rule-based reasoning. The techniques described in this paper can be applied to sematic knowledge search systems using tags, since transitivity reasoning, which uses tags, knowledge products, and relations among people, is possible. In addition, as related users can be searched using related tags, the techniques can also be employed to establish collaboration models or semantic communities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anupriya Ankolekar, Markus Krotzsch, Thanh Tran and Denny Vrandecic, "The Two Cultures : Mashing up Web2.0 and the Semantic Web," Proc. of the 16th Int'l Conf. on World Wide Web, 2007, pp. 825-834.
  2. T. O'Reilly, "What Is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software," Int'l Journal of Digital Economics, vol. 65, 2007, pp. 17-37.
  3. Osterman Research, Inc., "Why Web 2.0 is Critical to Your Business," An Osterman Research Position Paper, 2007.
  4. Tricia Bisoux, "Teaching Business In a Web 2.0 Word," AACSB Int'l, BizEd magazine, 2008, pp. 28-35.
  5. 문형우, "지식 거래 서비스를 위한 온톨로지 설계," 창원대학교 석사학위논문, 2009.
  6. Eetu Makela, "Survey of Semantic Search Research," Seminar on Knowledge Management on the Semantic Web, Department of Computer Science, University of Helsinki, 2005.
  7. Giuseppe De Giacomo and Maurizio Lenzerini, "TBox and ABox reasoning in expressive description logics," Proc. of the 1th Int'l Conf. on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 1996, pp. 316-327.
  8. Achille Fokoue, Aaron Kershenbaum, Li Ma, Edith Schonberg and Kavitha Srinivas, "The Summary Abox: Cutting Ontologies Down to Size," LNCS4273, 2006, pp. 343-356.
  9. Markus Krotzsch, Pascal Hitzler, Denny Vrandecic and Michael Sintek, "How to reason with OWL in a logic programming system," Proc. of the 2th Int'l Conf. on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web, 2006, pp. 17-28.
  10. T. Liebig and F. Muller, "Parallelizing tableaux-based description logic reasoning," Proc. of the 3rd Int'l Workshop on Scalable Semantic Web Knowledge Base Systems, LNCS4806, 2007, pp. 1135-1144.
  11. 최정화, 박영택, "온톨로지 추론 기술 동향, " 한국정보과학회, vol. 24, no. 12, 2006, pp. 47-55.
  12. Timo Weithoner, Thorsten Liebig, Marko Luther, Sebastian Bohm, Friedrich von Henke and Olaf Noppens, "Real-World Reasoning with OWL," LNCS4519, 2007, pp. 296-310.
  13. Bijan Parsia and Evren Sirin, "Pellet: An OWL-DL Reasoner," Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 5, no. 2, 2007, pp. 51-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.03.004
  14. McKenzie and Mr Craig, "Implementing a Semantic Web Blackboard System using Jena," Proc. of Jena User Conf. (JUC2006), 2007.
  15. 서은석, 최용준, 박영택, "대용량 ABox에서 서술논리 SHIQ(D) 추론 지원 방법, " 한국정보과학회, vol. 34, no. 6, 2007, pp. 530-538.
  16. 서은석, 박영택, "다양한 OWL-DL 추론 엔진에서 대용량 ABox 추론에 대한 성능평가, " 한국정보과학회, vol. 34, no. 7, 2007.
  17. Ian Horrocks, Peter F. Patel-Schneider, Harold Boley, Said Tabet, Benjamin Grosof and Mike Dean, "SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML," W3C Member Submission, 2004. http://www.w3.org/Submission/ SWRL
  18. R. Guha, R. McCool and E. Miller, "Semantic Search," Proc. of the 12th Int'l Conf. World Wide Web, ACM Press, 2003, pp. 700-709.
  19. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler and O. Lassila, "The Semantic Web: A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities," Scientific American, 2002, pp. 24-30.
  20. Peter Schulte, "Description Logics-An Introduction Using Example in OWL," 2006. http://dbis.informatik.uni-freiburg. de/content/ c ourses/SS06/Seminar/Description%20Logic%20an d%20Logic%20Programming/Folien/DL_Schulte_2 4-05.pdf
  21. 박영택, "서술논리와 온톨로지 추론," 숭실대학교 컴퓨터학부, 6, 2007. http://ontology.hufs.ac.kr/archive/workshop/4/4.pdf.
  22. 정도현, "시맨틱웹을 위한 온톨로지 언어와 구현 사례 연구, " 정보관리연구, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 져보관 109, 2003.
  23. Franz Baader and Ulrike Sattler, "An Overview of Tableau Algorithms for Description Logics," Studia Logica, vol. 69, no. 1, 2004, pp. 5-40.
  24. Jurgen Bock, Peter Haase, Qiu Ji and Raphael Volz, "Benchmarking OWL Reasoners," Proc. of the Workshop on Advancing Reasoning on the Web, 2008.
  25. U. Hustadt, B. Motik and U. Sattler, "Reducing SHIQ Descrption Logic to Disjunctive Datalog Programs," Proc. of the 9th Int'l Conf. on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, 2004, pp. 152-162.
  26. Thorsten Liebig, "Reasoning with OWL-System support and Insights," Computer Science Faculty, Ulm University, Technical report, 2006.