A Feasibility Study for Renewable Energy from Sewage Sludge Biogas

하수슬러지 Biogas의 신재생에너지화 타당성 연구

  • Kang, Ho (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hye Mi (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Sang Sun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Park, Sun Uk (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Ji Hyun (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 강호 (충남대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 이혜미 (충남대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 조상선 (충남대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 박선욱 (충남대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 정지현 (충남대학교 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2010.02.10
  • Accepted : 2010.07.30
  • Published : 2010.09.30

Abstract

This study was carried out not only to evaluate optimal operating condition to increase biogas production, but also to estimate feasibility of renewable energy from anaerobic digester of sewage sludge. Semi- continuous Fed and Mixed Reactors (SCFMRs) were operated in various condition to quantify the reactor variables. The result of SCFMR operation showed that the biogas productivity and total volatile solids (TVS) removal of total solids (TS) 4% reactor at hydraulic retention time (HRT) 20 days with Organic Loading Rate (OLR) of $1.45kg/m^3-d$ were $0.39m^3/m^3-d$ and 26.7%, respectively which was two times higher than that of TS 2.5% reactor. Consequently the daily biogas production of $20,000m^3$ would be possible from the total volume of $52,000m^3$ of anaerobic digesters of the municipal wastewater treatment plant in D city. In feasibility study for the Biogas utilization, combined heat and power system (CHP) and CNG gasification were examined. In case of CHP, the withdrawal period of capital cost for gas-engine (GE) and micro gas-turbine (MGT) were 7.7 years and 9.1 years respectively. biogas utilization as Clean Natural Gas (CNG) shows lower capital cost and higher profit than that of CHP system. CNG gasificaion after biogas purification is likely the best alternative for Biogas utilization which have more economic potential than CHP system. The withdrawal period of capital cost appeared to be 2.3 years.

Keywords

References

  1. 송영채, 권상조, 우정희(2003). 하수슬러지의 단상 고온 및 중온 혐기성소화와 중온-고온 공상 혐기성소화공정의 성능비교. 대한환경공학회지, 25(6), pp. 739-746.
  2. 이인주, 공성호, 김승, 김용수(2001). 화학적 개량에 의한 하수슬러지의 탈수성과 결합수 함량에 대한 연구. Bulletin of Environmental Sciences, 22, pp. 8.
  3. 이준재(2003). 하수슬러지의 혐기성소화 증진을 위한 초음파전처리. 석사학위논문, 충남대학교.
  4. 장은성, 유승훈, 배재근(2007). 음식물류 폐기물 혐기성 소화에 있어서 TS농도 영향. 유기물자원화, 15(2), pp. 118-127.
  5. 환경부(2007). 하수도통계.
  6. Lin, J. G., Chang, C. N., and Chang, S. C. (1997). Enhancement of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge solubilization. Bioresource Technology, 63, pp. 85-90.