Case Study of Cost Effect Analysis for Toxic Compounds to Developing Effluent Limitation Standards : Focus on 1,4-Dichlorobenzene

수질유해물질 배출허용기준 설정에 따른 배출시설 비용영향 분석사례 연구: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene을 중심으로

  • Kim, Kyeongjin (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Wongi (Center for zero emission technology, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Heo, Jin (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Kwangin (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Kim, Jaehoon (National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Kim, Sanghun (National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Yeom, Icktae (Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 김경진 (성균관대학교 사회환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 김원기 (무배출형환경설비지원센터) ;
  • 허진 (성균관대학교 사회환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 김광인 (성균관대학교 사회환경시스템공학과) ;
  • 김재훈 (국립환경과학원) ;
  • 김상훈 (국립환경과학원) ;
  • 염익태 (성균관대학교 사회환경시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2010.05.31
  • Accepted : 2010.06.29
  • Published : 2010.07.30

Abstract

Recently, regulations on toxic compounds in aquatic environment have been strengthened in korea due to the increasing public awareness of the water quality. Typically, these regulations include introduction of emerging toxic compounds and stricter effluent limitations for the already regulated compounds. However, too strict regulations may cause excessive burden on the industry. Therefore it is also important to assess the economic impacts when the new effluent limitation guidelines are introduced. The estimation of the additional cost for the wastewater dischargers to meet the new guidelines are based on the selected treatment technology to handle the hazardous substances and the regulatory levels for effluent limitations. To explore the procedures for cost estimation in enforcing new effluent limitations, a case study was performed specially for 1,4-dichlorobenzene. The pollutants of concern are surveyed for different industrial categories and various treatment technologies. For a given pollutant, the general performances of the treatment technologies are surveyed and a representative technology is selected. For a given technology, the capital cost and annual Operation and Maintenance (O&M) cost was calculated. The calculation of baseline costs to operate ordinary treatment technologies is also important. The ratio between the cost for introducing new treatment process and the baseline cost required for conventional technology was used to evaluate the economic impact on the industry. For 1,4-dichlorobenzene, steam stripping and activated carbon processes were selected as the specific treatment technologies. The cost effects to the regulation of the compound were found to be 6.4% and 14.5% increase in capital cost and O&M cost, respectively, at the flow rate over $2,000m^3/d$ for the categories of synthetic resin and other plastics manufacturing industry. For the case of petrochemical basic compounds manufacturing industry, the cost increases were 5.8% and 12.4%, respectively. It was suggested that cost effect analysis to evaluate the economic impacts of new effluent limitations on the industry is crucial to establish more balanced and reasonable effluent limitations to manage the industrial wastewater containing emerging toxic compounds in the wastewater.

Keywords

References

  1. 국립환경과학원 (2009). 기술에 근거한 폐수배출허용기준 및 근거자료 조사연구(II). KIST, 성균관대.
  2. 김경진, 손대희, 허진, 김광인, 권오상, 염익태(2010a). 처리기술에 근거한 산업폐수 배출허용기준 국내 적용성 연구(I) : 미국 TBELs 적용사례 검토. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 26(1), pp. 1-9.
  3. 김경진, 김원기, 정상구, 정진영, 김재훈, 김상훈, 염익태(2010b). 처리기술에 근거한 산업폐수 배출허용기준 국내 적용성 연구(II) : 산업폐수 위해성 지표를 이용한 오염부하 기여도 분석. 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 26(2), pp.191-199.
  4. 김경진, 손대희, 허진, 김광인, 김재훈, 김상훈, 염익태(2010c). 처리기술에 근거한 산업폐수 배출허용기준 국내 적용성 연구(III) : 국내적용 방안 및 사례연구(펼프, 종이 및 종이제품 제조시설). 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 26(3), pp. 377-386.
  5. 환경부(2001). 주택단지 내 상수, 오수발생량 원단위 산정 및 하수처리시설 소요비용연구.
  6. 환경부(2007a). 전국 폐수배출시설 조사자료.
  7. 환정부(2007b). 화학물질 배출량 조사자료.
  8. 환경부(2009a). 2008년도 산업단지 폐수종말처리시설 운영 현황.
  9. 환경부(2009b). 수질유해물질 적정관리를 위한 배출허용기준 설정연구(9차년도). 성균관대.
  10. Banerjee, S. (1984). Solubility of organic mixture in water. Environ. Sci. Technol., 18, pp. 587-591. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00126a004
  11. Jiang, Y., Pettier, C., and David Waite, T. (2002). Kinetics and mechanisms of ultrasonic degradation of volatile chlorinated aromatics in aqueous solutions. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 9, pp. 317-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-4177(02)00085-8
  12. Selli, E., Bianchi, C. L, Pirola, C., Cappelletti, G., and Ragaini, V. (2008). Efficiency of 1,4-dichlorobenzene degradation in water under photolysis, photocatalysis on $TiO_2$ and sonolysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 153, pp. 1136-1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.071
  13. Tabak, H. H., Quave, S. A., Mashni, C. I., and Barth, E. F. (1981). Biodegradability Studies with organic priority pollutant compounds. J. Water Pollu. Control Fed., 53, pp. 1503-1518.
  14. USEPA (1987). Development Document for Effluent Limitation Guideline and Standards for OCPSF Point Source Category.
  15. USEPA (1998). Development Document for Effluent Limitation Guideline and Standards for Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Point Source Category.
  16. USEPA (2008). Technical Support Document for the 2008 Effluent Guidelines Program Plan.
  17. USEPA (2009). Treatability Database Version 5.0' Database.