Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy (식물분류학회지)

The Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists (한국식물분류학회)
권호 표지

Phylogeny and systematics of Crossosomatales as inferred from chloroplast atpB, matK, and rbcL sequences

  • Oh, Sang-Hun (L. H. Bailey Hortorium, Department of Plant Biology, 412 Mann Library, Cornell University)
  • Received : 2010.11.26
  • Accepted : 2010.12.08
  • Published : 2010.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Crossosomatales is a recently recognized order in the rosid II clade with about 64 species in eight morphologically distinct families that have been previously classified in as many as 15 other orders. Phylogenetic relationships among the families and genera within Crossosomatales were investigated using chloroplast atpB, matK, and rbcL sequences employing maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods. The phylogenetic framework was used to examine the patterns of morphological evolution and synapomorphies for subclades within Crossosomatales. The combined data with representative species from all genera in the order strongly supported monophyly of Crossosomatales. Strong support was found for the families in the Southern Hemisphere, in which Aphloiaceae is sister to the clade of (Geissolomataceae, (Ixerbaceae + Strasburgeriaceae)). The sister relationship between the Southern Hemisphere clade and families distributed primarily in the Northern Hemisphere was also supported. As in the previous studies, following relationships were found within the Northern Hemisphere clade: Staphyleaceae is sister to a clade of (Guamatelaceae, (Stachyuraceae + Crossosomataceae)). The pattern analysis indicates that evolutionary pattern of morphological characters is complex, requiring multiple changes within Crossosomatales. Several reproductive traits, such as inflorescence, aril, stigma, and conspicuous protrusion from pollen aperture, corroborate the molecular phylogeny.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Boyce Thompson Institute for Plant Research

References

  1. APG III. 2009. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 161:105-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x
  2. Cameron, K. M. 2003. On the phylogenetic position of the New Caledonian endemic families Paracryphiaceae, Oncothecaceae, and Strasburgeriaceae: a comparison of molecules and morphology. Bot. Rev. 68: 428-443.
  3. Carquist, S. 2007. Wood anatomy of Crossonsomatales: pattems of wood evolution with relation to phylogeny and ecology. Aliso 24: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.5642/aliso.20072401.02
  4. Chen, S. K. 1981. A study on the Stachyuraceae form China. Acta Bot. Yunnan. 3: 125-137.
  5. Christenhusz, M. J. M. F. Fay, J. J. Clarkson, P. Gasson, J. Morales, J. B. J. Barrios and M. W. Chase. 2010. Petenaeaceae, a new angiosperm family in Huerteales with a distant relationship to Gerrardinaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 164: 16-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2010.01074.x
  6. Cronquist, A. 1981. An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
  7. Cunningham, A. 1839. Florae insularm Novae Zelandiae precursor. Annals of Natural Histroy 3: 244-250.
  8. Dikison, W. C. 1981. Contributions to the morphology and anatomy of Strasbergeria and a discussion of the taxonomic position of the Strasburgeriaceae. Brittonia 33: 564-580. https://doi.org/10.2307/2806765
  9. Dikison, W. C. 1986. Floral morphology and anatomy of Staphyl-eaceae. Bot. Gaz. 147:312-326. https://doi.org/10.1086/337598
  10. Dikison, W. C. 2007. Srasburgeriaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants Kubitzki, K. (ed.), Springer, Berlin. Pp. 446-448.
  11. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791. https://doi.org/10.2307/2408678
  12. Forest, F. 2007. Geissolomataceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Kubitzki, K. (ed.), Springer, Berlin. Pp. 155-156.
  13. Hilu, K. W., T. Borsch, K. Muller, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, V. Savolainen, M. W. Chase, M. P. Powell, L. A. Alice, R. Evans, H. Sauquet, C. Neinhuis, T. A. B. Slotta, J. G. Rohwer, C. S.Campbell and L. W. Chartou. 2003. Angiosperm phylogeny based on matk sequence information. Amer. J. Bot. 90: 1758-1776. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.90.12.1758
  14. Huelsenbeck, J. P. and F. Ronquist. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17: 754-755. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754
  15. Kubitzki, K. 2007. Aphloiaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Kubitzki, K. (ed.), Springer, Berlin. Pp. 31-32.
  16. Li, D., J, Wen. 2008, Staphyleaceae. In Flora of China, vol. 11 (Oxalidaceae through Aceraceae). Wu, Z. Y., P. H. Raven, and D. Y. Hong. (eds.), Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press. St. Louis. Pp. 498-504.
  17. Madddison, W. P and D. R. Maddison. 2000. MacClade: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, version 4.0 PPC Sinauer, Sunderland.
  18. Matthews, M. L. and P. K. Endree. 2005. Comparative floral structure and systematics in Grossosomatales (Crossosomatacee, Stachyuraceae, Staphyleaceae, Aphloiaceae, Geissolomataceae, Ixerbaceae, Strasburgeriaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 147:1-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2005.00347.x
  19. Nandi, O., M. W. Chase and P.K. Endress. 1998. A combined cladistic analysis of angiosperms using rbcL and non-molecular data sets. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 137-212. https://doi.org/10.2307/2992003
  20. Nixon, K. C. and J. M. Carpenter. 1996. On consensus: collapsibility, and clade concordance. Cladistics 12: 305-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00017.x
  21. Oginuma, K. J. Munzinger and H. Tobe. 2006. Exceedingly high chromosome number in Strasburgeriaceae, a monotypic family endemic to New Caledonia. Pl. Syst. Evol. 262:97-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-006-0451-8
  22. Oh, S. and D. Potter. 2006. Description and phylogenetic position of a new angiosperm family, Guamatelaceae, inferred from chloroplast, rbcL, atpB, and matk sequences. Syst. Bot. 31: 730-738. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364406779695889
  23. Posada, D. and K. A. Cranball. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817
  24. Qiner, Y. and P. F. Stevens. 2007. Stachyuraceae. In Flora of China, vol. 11 (Oxalidaceae through Aceraaceae). Wu, Z. Y., P. H. Raven, and D. Y. Hong. (eds.), Science Press, Beijing, and Missouri Botanical Garden Press. St. Louis. Pp. 138-140.
  25. Reveal, J. L. 1993. New ordinal names fox extant vascular plants. Phytologia 74: 173-177.
  26. Savolainen, V., M. W. Chase, S. B. Hoot, C. M. Morton, D. E. Soltis, C. Bayer, M. F. Fay, A. Y. de Bruijn, S. Sullivan and Y-L. Qiu. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49: 306-362. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/49.2.306
  27. Schneider, J. V. 2007. Ixerbaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Kubitzki, K. (ed.), Springer, Berlin. Pp. 205-207.
  28. Shan, H. R. 1999. Stachyuraceae. In Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinica, vol. 52 (1). Delectis Florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae Edita, (eds.), Science Press, Beijing. Pp. 81-96.
  29. Simmns, S. L. 2007. Staphyleaceae. In The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Kubitzki, K. (ed.), Springer, Berlin. Pp. 440-445.
  30. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, M. W. Chase, M. E. Mort, D.C. Albach, M. Zanis, V. Savolainen, W. H. Hahn, S. B. Hoot, M. F. Fay, M. Axtell, S. M. Swensen, L. M. Prince, W.J.Kress, K. C. Nixon and J. S. Farris. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Bot. J. Linn Soc. 133: 381-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2000.tb01588.x
  31. Soltis, D. E., M. A. Gitzendanner and P. S. Soltis. 2007. A 567-taxon data set for angiosperms. the challenges posed by Bayesian analyses of large data sets. Int. J. Pl. Sci. 168:137-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/509788
  32. Sosa, V. and M. W. Chase. 2003. Phylogenetics of Crossosomataceae based on rbcL sequence data. Syst. Bot. 28: 96-105.
  33. Stevens, P. F. 2001 onwards. Angiosperm phylogeny Website. Version 6, May 2005 [and more or less continuously updated since].
  34. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP* .Phylogenegic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associater, Sunderland, MA.
  35. Swofford, D. L., G. K. Olsen, P. J. Waddell and D. M. Hillis. 1996. Phylogeny reconstruction. In Molecular sysematics, Ed. 2, Hillis, D. M., C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable. (ed.), Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA. Pp. 407-514.
  36. Takhtajan, A. 1987. Systema Magnoliophytorum. Nauka, Leningrad.
  37. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.
  38. Thorne, R. F. and J. L. Reveal. 2007. An updated classification of the class Magnoliopsida ("Angiospermae"). Bot. Rev. 73: 67-181. https://doi.org/10.1663/0006-8101(2007)73[67:AUCOTC]2.0.CO;2
  39. Wang, H. C., M. J. Moore, P. S. Soltis, C. D. Bell, S. F. Brockington, R. Alexandre, C. C. Davis, M. Latvis, S. R. Manchester and D. E. Soltis. 2009. Rosid radiation and the rapid rise of angiosperm-dominated forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 106: 3853-3858. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0813376106
  40. Weber, M. and A. Igersheim. 1994. 'Pollen buds' in Ophiorrhiza (Rubiaceae) and their role in pollenkitt release. Bot. Acta 107: 187-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1994.tb00785.x
  41. Worber, A., M. H. Alford, D. Quandt and T. Borsch. 2009. Huerteales sister to Brassicales plus Malvales, and newly circumscribed to include Dipentodon, Gerradina, Huertea, Perrottetia, and Tapiscia. Taxon 58: 468-478.
  42. Zhu, Y.-P., J. Wen, Z.-Y. Zhang and Z. Chen. 2006. Evolutionary relationships and diversificatio of Stachyuraceae based on sequences of four chloroplast markers and the nuclear ribosomal ITS region. Taxon 55:931-940. https://doi.org/10.2307/25065687
  43. Zwickl, D. J. 2006. Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin. Website htto://www. bio. utexas. edu/faculty/antisense/garli/Garli.html.