Treatment of Blow-out Fractures Using Both Titanium Mesh Plate and Porous Polyethylene (Medpor®)

광범위한 안와파열골절에서 Titanium Mesh Plate와 Porous Polyethylene (Medpor®) 동시 사용의 유용성

  • Gu, Ja Hea (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Collage of Medicine) ;
  • Won, Chang Hoon (Jewelry Plastic Surgery) ;
  • Dhong, Eun-Sang (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Collage of Medicine) ;
  • Yoon, Eul-Sik (Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University Collage of Medicine)
  • 구자혜 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 원창훈 (쥬얼리 성형외과) ;
  • 동은상 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 윤을식 (고려대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.03.04
  • Accepted : 2010.08.16
  • Published : 2010.11.10

Abstract

Purpose: The goals of a blow-out fracture reconstruction are to restore the osseous continuity, provide support for the orbital contents and prevent functional and anatomic defects. Over the past several years, a range of autogenous and synthetic implants have been used extensively in orbital reconstructions. None of these implants have any absolute indications or contraindications in certain clinical settings. However, in extensive blow-out fractures, it is difficult to restore support of the orbital contents, which can cause more complications, such as enophthalmos. This study examined the clinical outcomes of extensive or comminuted blow-out fractures that were reconstructed by the simultaneous use of a titanium mesh plate and $Medpor^{(R)}$. Methods: Eighty six patients with extensive orbital fractures, who were admitted between March 1999 and February 2007, were reviewed retrospectively. The patients' chart and CT were inspected for review. Twenty three patients were operated on with both a titanium mesh plate (Matrix MIDFACE pre-formed orbital plate, Synthes, USA) and $Medpor^{(R)}$ (Porex, GA, USA). The patients underwent pre-operative CT scans to evaluate the fracture site and measure the area of the fracture. A transconjunctival approach was used, and titanium mesh plates were inserted subperiosteally with screw fixation. $Medpor^{(R)}$ was inserted above the titanium mesh plate. The patients were evaluated post-operatively for enophthalmos, diplopia, sensory disturbances and eyeball movement for a period of at least 6 months. Results: No implant-related complications were encountered during the follow-up period. Enophthalmos occurred in 1 patient, 1 patient had permanent sensory disturbance, and 3 patients complained of ocular pain and fatigue, which recovered without treatment. Although there were no significance differences between groups, the use of 2 implants had fewer complications. Therefore, it can be an alternative method for treating blow out fractures. Conclusion: The use of both a titanium mesh plate and $Medpor^{(R)}$ simultaneously may be a safe and acceptable technique in the reconstruction of extensive blow-out fractures.

Keywords

References

  1. Suhk JH, Ji SY, Kim TB, Yang WS: Internal fixation of $Medpor^{\circledR}$ implant for prevention of enophthalmos in posteriorly extended orbital floor fracture. J Korean Cleft Palate Craniofac Assoc 9: 55,2008
  2. Kim JI, Park ES, Tark MS, Jung SG, Kim YB: Orbital wall reconstruction with resorbable polymeric mesh. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 31: 637, 2004
  3. Burm JS, Hyuan JH, Oh SJ, Roh TS: Use of a titanium buttress to prevent implant displacement in extensive orbital blowout fracture. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 27: 92, 2000
  4. Nam SB, Bae YC, Moon JS, Kang YS: Analysis of the postoperative outcome in 405 cases of orbital fracture using 2 synthetic orbital implants. Ann Plast Surg 56: 263, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sap.0000199173.73610.bc
  5. Villarreal PM, Monje F, Morillo AJ, Junquera LM, Gonzalez C, Barbon JJ: Porous polyethylene implants in orbital floor reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 109: 877, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200203000-00007
  6. Ellis E, Tan Y: Assessment of internal orbital reconstructions for pure blowout fractures: Cranial bone grafts versus titanium mesh. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 61: 442, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2003.50085
  7. Rinna C, Ungari C, Saltarel A, Cassoni A, Reale G: Orbital floor restoration. J Craniofac Surg 16: 968, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.scs.0000186308.16795.8b
  8. Kim HK, Choi MS, Kim WS, Bae TH: The inferior orbital wall reconstruction by titanium micro-mesh remodeling. J Korean Cleft Palate Craniofac Assoc 10: 81, 2009
  9. Su GW, Harris GJ: Combined inferior and medial surgical approaches and overlapping thin implants for orbital floor and medial wall fractures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 22: 420, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iop.0000242163.03589.0e