Hip & pelvis

  • 제22권3호
  • /
  • Pages.197-202
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2287-3260(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3279(eISSN)
대한고관절학회 (The Korean Hip Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

지주 동종골 이식술 및 광범위 미세 피복 대퇴스템을 이용한 고관절 재치환술

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Strut Allograft and an Extensively Porous-Coated Femoral Stem

  • 이경재 (계명대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 민병우 (계명대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 배기철 (계명대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 조철현 (계명대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김동후 (계명대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실)
  • Lee, Kyung-Jae (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Keimyung University) ;
  • Min, Byung-Woo (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Keimyung University) ;
  • Bae, Ki-Cheor (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Keimyung University) ;
  • Cho, Chul-Hyun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Keimyung University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Hu (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Keimyung University)
  • 발행 : 2010.09.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 인공 고관절 재치환술 시 다량의 대퇴골 골결손 부위에 대해 지주 동종골 이식술 및 광범위 미세 피복 대퇴스템을 사용하고 그 결과를 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 1998년부터 2005년까지 재치환술 시 근위 대퇴골 골결손으로 지주 동종골 이식술 및 광범위 미세 피복 대퇴스템을 사용하고 2년 이상 추시관찰이 가능하였던 12예를 대상으로 하였다. 추시 기간은 평균 4.6년이었다. 재치환술의 원인은 광범위한 골용해 및 이로 인한 대퇴 삽입물 주위 골절이 5예, 무균성 해리 7예였다. 결과: harris 고관절 점수는 술전 평균 40.8점에서 최종 추시시 85.1점으로 향상되었으며 대퇴삽입물의 고정도는 11예(92%)에서 골성 안정 소견을 보였드며 1예(8%)에서 섬유성 안정 소견을 보였다. 응력 방패 현상은 1예에서 중등도의 소견을 보였으나 최종 추시 시 진행되는 소견은 없었다. 최종 추시시 심한 마모나 골용해를 보인 예는 없었으며 심부감염 1예를 제외한 전 예에서 이식골의 유합을 확인할 수 있었다. 결론: 다량의 대퇴골 골결손이 동반된 환자에서 자주 동종골 이식술 및 광범위 미세 피복 대퇴스템을 이용한 재치환술은 만족할 만한 결과를 보였으나 응력방패 현상 및 이식골로 인한 합병증 등에 대해서는 장기간의 추시관찰이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

Purpose: We wanted to report on the outcomes of using a strut allograft and extensively porous-coated femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty that was performed due to extensive femoral bone loss. Materials and Methods: Between 1998 and 2005, we performed 167 consecutive revision total hip arthroplasties. Among them, twelve cementless femoral revision surgeries with a strut allograft and extensively porous-coated stems were retrospectively reviewed. The average follow up was 4.6 years. The average age at the time of the index revision was 55.9 years. The reasons for the revisions were periprosthetic fracture due to extensive osteolysis in 5 hips and aseptic loosening in 7 hips. Results: The Harris hip score improved from a mean of 40.8 points before revision surgery to a mean of 85.1 points at the latest follow up. Radiographic evidence of bony stable stems were present in 11 hips and a fibrous stable stem was present in 1 hip. Moderate stress-shielding was noticed in one hip. Nonunion of the allograft was observed in 1 hip due to deep infection. To date, no significant wear or osteolysis has been observed. Conclusion: Revision total hip arthroplasty with a strut allograft and an extensively porous-coated femoral stem for treating cases of extensive femoral bone loss seems to be a reasonable choice. However, the concerns related to stress shielding, the difficulties in re-revisions and the complications associated with an allograft will require longer term follow up.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Hozack WJ, Bicalho PS, Eng K. Treatment of femoral osteolysis with cementless total hip revision. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:668-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80004-0
  2. Emerson RH Jr, Malinin TI, Cuellar AD, Head WC, Peters PC. Cortical strut allografts in the reconstruction of the femur in revision total hip arthroplasty. A basic science and clinical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;285:35-44.
  3. Haddad FS, Spangehl MJ, Masri BA, Garbuz DS, Duncan CP. Circumferential allograft replacement of the proximal femur. A critical analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;371:98-107. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200002000-00011
  4. Gie GA, Linder L, Ling RS, Simon JP, Slooff TJ, Timperley AJ. Impacted cancellous allografts and cement for revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:14-21.
  5. Slooff TJ, Buma P, Schreurs BW, Schimmel JW, Huiskes R, Gardeniers J. Acetabular and femoral reconstruction with impacted graft and cement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:108-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199603000-00013
  6. KO HS, Jeong WS, Kim BJ, Kim YY. The correlation between the radiographic appearance and operative findings at the bone-cement junction in cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc. 1995;7:35-42.
  7. Mulroy WF, Harris WH. Revision total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques for aseptic loosening of the femoral component. A fifteen-year average follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:325-30. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199603000-00002
  8. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Ilstrup D, Lewallen DG, Cabanela ME. Survivorship of uncemented proximally porous-coated femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:168-77.
  9. Head WC, Emerson RH Jr, Higgins LL. A titanium cementless calcar replacement prosthesis in revision surgery of the femur: 13-year experience. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:183-7. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.28718
  10. Cameron HU. The long-term success of modular proximal fixation stems in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17 Suppl:138-41. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.32462
  11. Kim YM, Kim HJ, Chang K. Revision total hip arthroplasty with S-ROM modular system. J Korean Hip Soc. 1997;9:190-7.
  12. Park MS, Yang KH, Kang KK. Total hip revision with proximal modular femoral stem. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 1999;34:1123-8.
  13. Han HJ, Kim SS, Choi SH. The use of the Wagner cementless revision stem in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Korean Hip Soc. 1999;11:161-7.
  14. Wagner H, Wagner M. Hip prosthesis revision with the non-cemented femoral revision stem-10 years experience. Med Orth Techs, 1997;117:138-48.
  15. Duncan CP, Masterson EL, Masri BA. Impaction allografting with cement for the management of femoral bone loss. Orthop Clin North Am, 1998;29:297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70327-8
  16. D'Antonio JA, McCarthy JC, Barger WL, et al. Classification of femoral abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;296:133-9.
  17. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51:737-55. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-196951040-00012
  18. Engh CA, Massin P, Suthers KE. Roentgenographic assessment of the biologic fixation of porous surfaced femoral components. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;257:107-28.
  19. Moreland JR, Moreno MA. Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty of the hip: minimum 5 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;393:194-201. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200112000-00022
  20. Gross AE, Blackley H, Wong P, Saleh K, Woodgate I. The role of allografts in revision arthroplasty of the hip. Instr Course Lect. 2002;51:103-13.
  21. Head WC, Malinin TI, Mallory TH, Emersono RH Jr. Onlay cortical allografting for femur. Orthop Clin North Am, 1998;29:307-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70328-X
  22. Lawrence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE, Lauro GR. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty done without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:965-73. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199407000-00002
  23. Moreland JR, Bernstein M. Femoral revision hip arthroplasty with uncemented, porous-coated stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;319:141-50.
  24. Lawerence JM, Engh CA, Macalino GE. Revision total hip arthroplasty. Long- term results without cement. Orthop Clin North Am. 1993;24:635-44.
  25. Parprosky WG, Greidanus NV, Antoniou J. Minimum 10-year-results of extensively porous-coated stems in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;369:230-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199912000-00024
  26. Weeden SH, Paprosky WG. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002;17 Suppl:134-7. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2002.32461
  27. Pak JH, Paprosky WG, Jablonsky WS, Lawrence JM. Femoral strut allografts in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;295:172-8.
  28. Kim YH, Kim JS. Revision hip arthroplasty using strut allografts and fully porous-coated stems. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:454-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.054
  29. Sugimura T, Tohkura A. THA revision with extensively porous-coated stems. 32 hips followed 2-6.5 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:11-3. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679809002346