DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Physiological Activities of Cucurbita moschata Duch. Extracts with Different Extraction Conditions

추출조건에 따른 늙은 호박 추출물의 생리활성

  • Published : 2010.02.27

Abstract

This study was to investigate physiological activities of Cucurbita moschata Duch. extracts by various extraction conditions. Electron donating ability of 50% ethanol extract was 52.37% at 50 mL/g, which was higher than those of 1.0% and 0.1% L-ascorbate solutions. SOD-like activities were the most effective in all of the samples at 50 mL/g, which were barely detectable. Total polyphenol contents were the highest at 50 mL/g for all fiber extracts. The nitrite scavenging effects were the most effective in pH 1.2 at more than 80%. Tyrosinase-inhibitory activities ranged at fewer than 19%. The results will be useful for understanding of the physiological activities of Cucurbita moschata Duch. extracts.

늙은 호박의 부위를 나누고 추출용매를 증류수, 50% EtOH, 100% EtOH로 달리하여 건물 중량의 25배에 해당되는 부피(w/v)일 때, 추출물의 생리활성 및 항산화 효과를 측정하였다. 추출물의 수율을 측정한 결과 추출용매를 증류수로 사용한 추출물들이 가장 높았으며, 특히 섬유질 추출물이 14.62%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 전자공여 작용의 경우 50% EtOH로 추출한 섬유질 추출물이 52.37%의 높은 전자 공여능을 보였다. SOD 유사활성을 측정한 결과에서는 100% EtOH에 의해 추출된 과육 추출물이 42.48%로 다른 추출물보다 높은 유사활성을 나타냈다. 총 폴리페놀 함량의 경우 50% EtOH로 추출한 섬유질 추출물이 121.49 mg%로 가장 높게 나타났다. 아질산염 소거능 측정 결과에서 모든 추출물이 pH 1.2에서 소거능이 가장 높게 측정되었다. Tyrosinase 활성 저해능의 경우 모든 과육 추출물이 11.36~19.14%로 가장 높게 나타났으나 비교물질인 L-ascorbic acid에 비해 매우 낮은 저해능을 보였다. ACE 저해활성에서도 전자공여능과 페놀함량 측정결과와 같이 50% EtOH로 추출한 섬유질 추출물이 가장 높게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Robinson RW, Decker-Watter DS. 1997. Cucurbits. CAB International, NY, USA. p 71-83.
  2. Park YK, Cha HS, Park MW, Kang YH, Seog HM. 1997. Chemical components in different parts of pumpkin. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 26: 639-646.
  3. Burton GW, Ingold GW. 1984. An unusual type of lipid antioxidant. Science 224: 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.224.4644.56
  4. Lee KS, Hwang CS. 1990. A study on the actual utilization korean traditional remedies-About foods used on geriatric disease-. Korean J Dietary Culture 5: 331-347.
  5. Shin YS, Lee KS, Kim DH. 1993. Studies on the preparation of yogurt from milk and sweet potato or pumpkin. J Food Sci Technol 25: 666-671.
  6. Park YH. 1995. A study on the development pumpkin citron-honey drink. J Korean Soc Food Nutr 24: 625-630.
  7. Yun SJ, Ahn HJ. 2000. Quality characteristics of pumpkin rice cake prepared by different cooking methods. Kor J Soc Food Sci 16: 36-39.
  8. Kang YH, Cha HS, Kim HM, Park YK. 1997. The nitrite scavenging and electron donating ability of pumpkin extracts. Korean J Food & Nutr 10: 31-36.
  9. An BJ, Lee JT, Kwak JH, Park JM, Lee JY, Park TS, Son JH, Lee LS, Yun SS. 2004. Physiological activities of pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata Duch) extracts. Kor J Herbology 19: 1-7.
  10. Kim SR, Ha TY, Song HN, Kim YS, Park YK. 2005. Comparison of nutritional composition and antioxidative activity for kabocha squash and pumpkin. Korean J Food Sci Technol 37: 171-177.
  11. Youn SJ, Kim GE, Jeong YJ. 2003. Extract characteristics of old pumpkin on enzyme treatment. Korean J Food Preserv 10: 302-307.
  12. Kang YH, Park YK, Lee GD. 1996. The nitrite scavenging and electron donating ability of phenolic compounds. Korean J Food Sci Technol 28: 232-239.
  13. Kim SM, Cho YS, Sung SK. 2001. The antioxidant ability and nitrite scavenging ability of plant extracts. Korean J Food Sci Technol 33: 626-632.
  14. Folin O, Denis W. 1912. On phosphotungstic-phosphomo-lybdic compounds as color reagents. J Biol Chem 12: 239-249.
  15. Gray JI, Dugan Jr LR. 1975. Inhibition of N-nitosamine formation in model food system. J Food Sci 40: 981-984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1975.tb02248.x
  16. Wong TC, Luh BS, Whitaker JR. 1971. Isolation and characterization of polyphenol oxidase of clingstone peach. Plant Physiol 48: 19-23. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.48.1.19
  17. Cushman DW, Chung HS. 1971. Spectrophotometric assay and properties of the angiotensin-converting enzyme of rabbit lung. Biochem Pharmacol 20: 1637-1648. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(71)90292-9
  18. Kang YH, Park YK, Oh SR, Moon KD. 1995. Studies on the physiological functionality of pine needle and mugwort extracts. Korean J Food Sci Technol 27: 978-984.
  19. Kwon HJ, Park CS. 2008. Biological activities of extracts form Omija. Korean J Food Preserv 15: 587-592.
  20. Kim HK, Han HS, Lee GD, Kim KH. 2005. Physiological activities of fresh Pleurotus eryngii extracts. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 34: 439-445. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2005.34.4.439
  21. Devy C, Gautier R. 1990. New perspectives on the biochemistry of superoxide anion and the efficiency of superoxide dismutase. Biochem Pharmacol 39: 399-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(90)90043-K
  22. Kuramoto T. 1992. Development and application of food materials from plant extract such as SOD up to date. Food Process 27: 22-23.
  23. Park CS, Kim DH, Kim ML. 2008. Biological activities of extracts from Corni fructus, Astragalus membranaceus and Glycyrrhiza uralensis. Kor J Herb 23: 93-101.
  24. Lee YS, Choi BD, Joo EY, Shin SR, Kim NW. 2009. Antioxidative activities and tyrosinase inhibition ability in various extracts of the Vitex rotundifolia seeds. Korean J Food Preserv 16: 101-108.
  25. Kim TH. 2008. Antioxdative and biological activities of Santalum album extracts by extracting methods. Korean J Food Preserv 15: 456-460.
  26. Choi JH, Lee EY, Kim GJ, Park IH, Kim JS, Choi GB, Jung SG, Ham YS. 2006. Physicochemical properties and physiological activities of Ulsan sweet persimmon peel․flesh according to cultivars. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 49:309-314.
  27. Yu MH, Im HG, Lee HJ, Ji YJ, Lee IS. 2006. Components and their antioxidative activities of methanol extracts from sarcocarp and seed of Zizyphus jujuba var. inermis rehder. Korean J Food Sci Technol 38: 128-134.
  28. Park YS, Jang HG. 2003. Lactic acid fermentation and biological activities of Rubus coreanus. J Korean Soc Agric Chem Biotechnol 46: 367-375.
  29. Park YK, Kang YH, Seog HM, Kim HM, Cha WS, Park MW. 1997. Studies of the development of processing technology of pumpkin. Research Report of Agricultural and Forest Ministry.
  30. Lee HT, Kim JH, Lee SS. 2009. Comparison of biological activity between soybean pastes adding sword been and general soybean pastes. J Fd Hyg Safety 24: 94-101.
  31. Chshman DW, Ondetti MA. 1980. Inhibitors of angiotensin converting enzyme for treatment of hypertension. Biochem Pharmacol 29: 1871-1877. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(80)90096-9
  32. Noh H, Song KB. 2001. Isolation of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor from Oenanthe javanica. Agric Chem Biotechnol 44: 93-99.
  33. Ju MJ, Kwon JH, Kim HK. 2009. Physiological activities of mulberry leaf and fruit extracts with different extraction conditions. Korean J Food Preserv 16: 442-448.
  34. Chung MS, Jung SH, Lee JS, Park KM. 2003. Physiological activities of commercial instant curry powders and individual spices. Korean J Food Sci Thechnol 35: 125-131.
  35. Lee SE, Bang JG, Seong NS. 2004. Inhibitory activity on angiotensin converting enzyme and antioxidant activity of Hovenia dulcis Thunb. cortex extract. Korean J Medicinal Crop Sci 12: 79-84.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Physiological Activities of Radish Bud (Raphanus sativus L.) according to Extraction Solvent and Sprouting Period vol.44, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2015.44.4.549
  2. Antioxidant and Anti-cancer Activities of Squash (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) Leaf Extract In vitro vol.45, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9721/KJFST.2013.45.6.770
  3. Enhanced Production of Phenolic Compounds from Pumpkin Leaves by Subcritical Water Hydrolysis vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3746/pnf.2016.21.2.132
  4. subtropical fruits vol.22, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2015.22.4.577
  5. LPS로 유도된 RAW 264.7 세포에 대한 레몬 머틀 잎 추출물의 항염증 효과 vol.27, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2017.27.9.986
  6. 호박 덩굴손 물 추출물의 염증제어 활성 vol.24, pp.8, 2010, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2017.24.8.1122
  7. 발효 5종 혼합물의 항산화 및 모발 성장 촉진 효과 vol.28, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2018.28.6.663
  8. Bacillus Subtilis KJ-3를 이용한 생물전환물 및 그 혼합물의 생리활성 vol.29, pp.10, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5352/jls.2019.29.10.1086