Journal of Magnetics

The Korean Magnetics Society (한국자기학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dual Core Differential Pulsed Eddy Current Probe to Detect the Wall Thickness Variation in an Insulated Stainless Steel Pipe

  • Angani, C.S. (Nuclear Materials Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Park, D.G. (Nuclear Materials Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, C.G. (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kollu, P. (Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cheong, Y.M. (Nuclear Materials Research Division, Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute)
  • Received : 2010.08.31
  • Accepted : 2010.10.04
  • Published : 2010.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Local wall thinning in pipelines affects the structural integrity of industries like nuclear power plants (NPPs). In the present study, a pulsed eddy current (PEC) differential probe with two excitation coils and two Hall-sensors was fabricated to measure the wall thinning in insulated pipelines. A stainless steel test sample was prepared with a thickness that varied from 1 mm to 5 mm and was laminated by plastic insulation to simulate the pipelines in NPPs. The excitation coils in the probe were driven by a rectangular current pulse, the difference of signals from two Hall-sensors was measured as the resultant PEC signal. The peak value of the detected signal is used to describe the wall thinning. The peak value increased as the thickness of the test sample increased. The results were measured at different insulation thicknesses on the sample. Results show that the differential PEC probe has the potential to detect wall thinning in an insulated NPP pipelines.

Keywords

References

  1. J. Blitz, Electrical and Magnetic Methods of Nondestructive Testing, Chapman & Hall, London, (1997) p.163.
  2. G. Mustafa, Sensors and Actuators A 91, 70 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(01)00511-8
  3. K. M. Hwang, T. E. Jin, and S. H. Lee, Trans. 17th Int. Conf. Structural Mechanics Reactor Technology (Prague, Czech Rep.) paper O02-5, 7 (2003).
  4. M. A. Robers and R. Scottini, 8th ECNDT Conf. (Barcelona, Spain) NDT.net 7 (2002).
  5. B. C. Yoseph, Materials Evauation 58, 17 (2000).
  6. S. Giguere, B. A. Lepine, and J. M. S. Dubois, Research in Nondestructive Evaluation 13, 119 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/09349840109409692
  7. J. C. Moulder, E. Uzal, and J. H. Rose, Rev. Sci. Instrum.63, 3455 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1143749
  8. I. Z. Abidin, C. Mandache, G. Y. Tian, and M. Morozov,NDT&E Int. 42, 599 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2009.04.001
  9. R. Griberg, L. Udpa, A. Savin, and R. Steigman, NDT&E Int. 39, 264 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2005.08.004
  10. Z. Motti, NDT Int. 23, 11 (1990).
  11. C. V. Dodd and W. E. Deeds, J. Appl. Phys. 39, 2829(1968). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1656680
  12. M. Gerhard, H. Olaf, and U. Valentin, Proc. ECNDT (Berlin, Germany) 5, 258 (2007).
  13. G. Y. Tian and A. Sophian, NDT&E Int. 38, 77 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2004.06.001
  14. B. Lebrun, Y. Jayet, and J. C. Baboux, NDT&E Int. 30,163 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8695(96)00072-2
  15. Y. K. Shin and D. M. Choi, NDT&E Int. 42, 215 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.09.006
  16. L. Shu, H. Songline, and Z. Wei, Sensors and Actuators A 135, 675 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2006.10.013
  17. C. S. Angani, D. G. Park, G. D. Kim, and C. G. Kim, J. Appl. Phys. 107, 09E720 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3337725
  18. ANASOFT corporation, Maxwell EM V13, www.ansoft.com.
  19. D. G. Park, C. S. Angani, G. D. Kim, and C. G. KimIEEE Trans. Magn. 45, 3893 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2009.2024219
  20. J. Bowler and M. Johnson, IEEE Trans. Magn. 33, 2258(1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/20.573841
  21. T. W. Krause, C. Mandache, and J. H. V. Lefebvr, Rev. Quantitative Nondest. Eval. 27, 368 (2008).
  22. W. Youhua, W. Junhua, L. Jiangui, and L. Haohua, Proc. Int. Conf. CTEEE (Novosibirsk, Russia) IEEE Region 8 Sibircon, 238 (2008).

Cited by

  1. Review paper: Application of the Pulsed Eddy Current Technique to Inspect Pipelines of Nuclear Plants vol.18, pp.3, 2013, https://doi.org/10.4283/JMAG.2013.18.3.342
  2. Pulsed Eddy Current Inspection of Wall Loss in Steam Generator Trefoil Broach Supports vol.17, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2016.2631541