Clinics in Shoulder and Elbow

Korean Shoulder and Elbow Society (대한견·주관절의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the Surgical Treatment for Chronic Acromioclavicular Joint Injury; Weaver and Dunn Method Versus Acromial Bone Block Transfer

오구견봉인대만을 이용한 술식과 견봉골편을 포함한 오구견봉인대를 이용한 변형 Weaver and Dunn 술식에서의 만성 견봉쇄골관절 손상 치료결과 추시

  • Park, Jin-Young (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Seung-Wan (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lhee, Sang-Hoon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine) ;
  • Seo, Jung-Bae (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Dankuk University school of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Jun (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University School of Medicine)
  • 박진영 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 강승완 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이상훈 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 서중배 (단국대학교 의학전문대학원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이승준 (건국대학교 의학전문대학원 정형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2010.10.28
  • Accepted : 2010.11.20
  • Published : 2010.12.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to compare treatment results of two different surgical techniques for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Materials and Methods: Fifty consecutive patients diagnosed as chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocations between January 1997 and June 2009 were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two different groups. Patients in the first group (n=20) were treated using a modified Weaver and Dunn method using a simple coracoacromial ligament transfer method. Patients in the other group (n=30) were treated with acromial bone-block transfer containing coracoacromial ligament. Mean follow-up times for the two groups were 13.1 and 14.9 months, respectively. Results: At 1 year postoperatively, mean coracoclavicular distance, the VAS score and the ASES score for the Weaver-Dunn method group; for the bone block transfer method group were 3.8 mm (-3 to 6 mm), 3.5 (1.0 to 7.0) and 91.1 (81.66 to 95); 3 mm (-2 to 6 mm), 4.2 (1.0 to 7.5) and 79.6 (31.66 to 95). There were no significant differences in radiologic (p=0.377) and functional (p=0.093) results between the two groups. Failures in the former and latter group were, respectively, two and one. Conclusion: The bone block transfer method shows a tendency to maintain coracoclavicular distance and appeared to yield similar results as the modified Weaver Dunn method.

목적: 저자들은 만성 견봉쇄골 관절 손상 환자에 대한 치료방법중, 오구견봉인대만을 이용한 변형 Weaver-Dunn 술식과 Shoji 등에 의해 소개된 골편이 부착된 오구견봉인대 전위술식간의 방사선학적 및 기능적인 평가를 통해 양군간의 치료결과를 비교하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 본 연구는 1997년 1월부터 2009년 6월까지 만성 견봉쇄골관절 손상으로 진단받은 50명의 환자를 대상으로 하였다. 이중 20명은 오구견봉인대만을 이용한 변형 Weaver-Dunn 술식을 이용하여 수술하였고, 나머지 30명은 골편을 이용한 술식을 통하여 수술하였다. 두 군의 평균 추시 기간은 각각 13.1 개월과 14.9 개월이었다. 결과: 술 후 1년째의 변형 Weaver-Dunn 군과 골편 이용군의 평균 오구쇄골간격, VAS 점수 및 ASES 점수는 3.8 mm (-3 to 6 mm); 3 mm (-2 to 6 mm), 3.5 (1.0 to 7.0); 4.2 (1.0 to 7.5) and 91.1 (81.66 to 95); 79.6 (31.66 to 95)였다. 두 군간의 방사선학적, 기능적 평가에서 통계학적으로 유의한 차이를 발견할 수는 없었다. 두 군의 실패환자는 각각 2명, 1명이었다. 결론: Shoji 술식군에서 상대적으로 재전위정도가 낮은 양상임을 알 수 있었고, 변형 Weaver-Dunn 술식에 비견할 만한 치료방법으로 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Rockwood CA Jr., Matsen FA: The shoulder. 2nd ed, Philadelphia, WB Saunders Co: 1353, 1996.
  2. Bannister G, Wallace, W, Stableforth, P., Hutson, M: Time management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 71: 848-850, 1989.
  3. Clarke H, McCann P: Acromioclavicular joint injuries. Orthop Clin North Am, 31: 177-187, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70139-5
  4. Larsen E, Bjerg-Nielsen A, Christensen P: Conservative or surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 68: 552-555, 1986.
  5. Jones HP, Lemos MJ, Schepsis AA: Salvage of failed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus tendon from the knee. Surgical technique and case report. Am J Sports Med, 29: 234-237, 2001.
  6. Nuber GW, Bowen MK: Arthroscopic treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries and results. Clin J Sport Med, 22: 301-317, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-5919(03)00014-0
  7. Tienen TG, Oyen JF, Eggen PJ: A modified technique of reconstruction for complete acromioclavicular dislocation: A prospective study. Am J Sports Med, 31: 655-659, 2003.
  8. Churl CH, Lee SH, Lee BC, Cho YW: The Surgical Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation using Modified Phemister and Modified Weaver-Dunn Operation. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc, 1: 180-185, 1998.
  9. Moon ES, Kim MS, Bae BH, Choi J: The Surgical Treatment in Type III Acromioclavicular Dislocation Patients Over 45 Years-Primary Clavicular Lateral End Resection Method vs. Conventional Acromioclavicular Joint Reduction Method-. J Korean Shoulder Elbow Soc, 8: 88-96, 2005. https://doi.org/10.5397/CiSE.2005.8.2.088
  10. Weaver JK, Dunn HK: Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 54: 1187-1194, 1972.
  11. Weaver JK: Personal communication, 1985.
  12. Shoji H, Roth C, Chuinar R: Bone block transfer of coracoacromial ligament in acromioclavicular injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 208: 272-277, 1986.
  13. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J: Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med, 35: 316-329, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546506298022
  14. Mazzocca AD, Santangelo SA, Johnson ST, Rios CG, Dumonski ML, Arciero RA: A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med, 34: 236-246, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281795
  15. Harris RI, Wallace AL, Harper GD, Goldberg JA, Sonnabend DH, Walsh WR: Structural properties of the intact and the reconstructed coracoclavicular ligament complex. Am J Sports Med, 28: 103-108, 2000.
  16. Jari R, Costic RS, Rodosky MW, Debski RE: Biomechanical function of surgical procedures for acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Arthroscopy, 20: 237-245, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2004.01.011
  17. Mumford EB: Acromioclavicular dislocation. A new operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 23: 799-802, 1941.
  18. Cadenat FM: The treatment of dislocations and fractures of the outer end of the clavicle. Int Clin, 1: 145-169, 1917.
  19. Neviaser JS: Acromioclavicular dislocation treated by transference of the coracoacromial ligament. AMA Arch Surg, 64:292-297, 1952. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1952.01260010306004
  20. Guy DK, Wirth MA, Griffin JL, et al.: Reconstruction of chronic and complete dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 347: 138-149, 1998.
  21. Morrison DS, Lemos MJ: Acromioclavicular separation. Reconstruction using synthetic loop augmentation. Am J Sports Med, 23: 105-110, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659502300118
  22. Pfahler M, Krodel A, Refior HJ: Surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 113: 308-311, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00426177
  23. Weinstein DM, McCann PD, McIlveen SJ, et al.: Surgical treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations. Am J Sports Med, 23: 324-331, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659502300313