Preventive Nutrition and Food Science

The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition (한국식품영양과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimizing Recipes of Mung Bean Pancake for Teenagers

  • Lee, Jin-Wha (Department of Food Science & Nutrition, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Shin, Eun-Soo (Department of Food Science & Nutrition, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Ryu, Hong-Soo (Department of Food Science & Nutrition, Pukyong National University)
  • Received : 2010.10.06
  • Accepted : 2010.12.06
  • Published : 2010.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To standardize the recipes for healthy fast food market potentiality, a sensory acceptability analysis, instrumental texture analysis and nutritional evaluation were performed on Korean style mung bean pancake (MPC) and modified MPC containing squid meat and soybean. Optimal ingredient formulation was revealed to be 34% mung bean, 49% pork and 17% vegetables for traditional MPC, and 21% pork, 66% squid meat and 13% soybean for modified MPC, using response surface methodology. Flavor and hardness correlated highly with overall acceptability, rather than appearance and color of traditional MPC. Higher squid levels raised adhesiveness, springiness and resilience of modified MPC, but the higher soybean levels decreased these textural attributes. Protein, lipid and total calories of modified MPC were lower than those of traditional MPC. Degree of gelatinization of modified MPC was superior to traditional MPC.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee SG, Jang MS. 2001. Standardization of preparationmethods for Hwajeun (1). Korean J Soc Food CookerySci 17: 237-246.
  2. Chang MJ, Cho MS. 2000. Recognition and preferenceto Korean traditional food of foreign visitors in Korea.Korean J Dietary Culture 15: 215-223.
  3. Koo SJ. 2001. The future prospect of food & cookery scienceof Korea. J Korean Food Cookery Sci 17: 165-195.
  4. Ro SB, Shin AS, Kil JO. 2001. A study on the traditionalfast food development of college students in Busan.Korean J Dietary Culture 16: 81-88.
  5. Kang SH, Ryu GH. 2002. Analysis of traditional processfor Yukwa making, a Korean puffed rice snack. KoreanJ Food Sci Technol 34: 818-823.
  6. Lee SM, Cho JS. 2001. Sensory and mechanical characteristicsof surichwi-injeulmi by adding surichwi contents.Korean J Soc Food Sci 17: 1-6.
  7. Prinyawiwatkul W, Beuchat LR, Mcwatters KH. 1993.Functional property changes in partially defatted peanutflour caused by fungal fermentation and heat treatment.J Food Sci 58: 1318-1323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1993.tb06174.x
  8. Birch LL, Marin DW. 1982. I don’t like it: I never triedit: Effects of exposure on two-year-old children’s foodpreferences. Appetite 3: 353-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(82)80053-6
  9. Moskowitz HR. 1994. Product optimization: approachesand applications. In Measurement of Food Preferences.MacFie HJH, Thomson DMH, eds. Blackie Academic &Professional, London, UK. p 97-136.
  10. Cornell JA. 1990. Experiment with Mixtures: Designs,Models, and the Analysis of Mixture Data. John Wiley& Sons, New York, USA. p 352-435.
  11. Borne MC. 1978. Textual profile analysis. Food Technol32: 60-65.
  12. Szczesniak AS. 1975. General foods texture profile revisitedten years perspective. J Texture Stud 6: 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4603.1975.tb01114.x
  13. AOAC. 1990a. Official methods of analysis. 15th ed.Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington,DC, USA. p 334, 777-784.
  14. Yamasita TR. 1968. Determination of ${\alpha}-starch$. CookeryScience 1: 24-26.
  15. AOAC. 1990b. Protein efficiency ratio. In Official Methodsof Analysis. 15th ed. Association of Official AnalyticalChemists, Washington, DC, USA. p 1095.
  16. Turner EW, Paynter WD, Montie EJ, Bessert MW, StruckGM, Olson FC. 1954. Use of the 2-thiobarbituric acid reagentto measure rancidity in frozen pork. Food Technol8: 326-330.
  17. Chung CH, Toyomizu M. 1976. Studies on the browningof dehydrated foods as a function of water activity: I.Effect of Aw on browning in amino acid-lipid systems.Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 42: 697-702. https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.42.697
  18. Minitab User’s Guide. 2000. Data Analysis and QualityTools. Minitab Inc., FL, USA. p 157-161.
  19. Scheffe H. 1958. Experimens with mixtures. J Royal StatSoc B20: 344-351.
  20. Cardello AV. 1994. Consumer expectations and their role in food acceptance. In Measurement of Food Preferences.MacFie HJH, Thomson DMH, eds. Blackie Academic &Prefessional, London, UK. p 253-297.
  21. Sidel JL, Stone H. 1983. An introduction to optimizationresearch. Food Technol 37: 36-43.
  22. Fishken D. 1983. Consumer-oriented product optimization.Food Technol 37: 49-54.
  23. MacDougall DB. 1983. Instrumental assessment of the appearanceof foods. In Sensory Quality in Foods andBeverages: Definition, Measurement and Control. WilliamsAA, Atkin RK, eds. Verlag Chemie International Inc.,Deerfield Beach, FL, USA. p 121-139.
  24. Prinyawiwatkul W, Mcwatters KH, Beuchat LR, Phillips RD. 1997. Optimizing acceptability of chicken nuggetscontaining fermented cowpea and peanut flours. J FoodSci 62: 889-893. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1997.tb15480.x
  25. Shin KS, Woo KJ. 1999. Changes in adding soybean onquality and surface structure of Korean rice cake (Jeungpyun).Korean J Soc Food Sci 15: 249-257.
  26. Na HN, Yoon S, Kim JS, Kim BY. 1998. The activityand characteristics of ${\alpha}-amylase$ present in soy milk and Jeung-pyun batters. Korean J Soc Food Sci 14: 261-265.
  27. Ryu HS, Hwang EY, Lee JH, Cho HK. 1998. A new regressionequation of pH drop procedure for measuring proteindigestibility. J Food Sci Nutr 3: 180-185.