참고문헌
- 권혁순, 최은규, 노태희 (2004). 화학 교육에서 사용되는 비유에 대한 학생들의 이해도 및 비유 사용의 제한점. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 287-297.
- 김동렬 (2008). 유전 관련 개념에 대한 고등학생들의 비유 만들기 수업의 적용 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(5), 423-437.
- 김수미, 정영란 (1997). 항상성, 동.식물 분류, 식물의 양분생산에 대한 학생의 개념 조사와 오개념 형성 원인으로써 교사 요인의 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(3), 261-271.
- 김희백, 김성하, 이선경, 김형련 (2001). 비유가 수업에 대한 흥미와 세포소기관의 기능 이해에 미치는 효과. 한국생물교육학회지, 29(4), 346-353.
- 김희정, 조연순 (2001). 초등학생의 광합성 개념학습에서 TWA 비유 수업모형의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(2), 444-458.
- 류수경 (2005). 과학 교수.학습에서 사용되는 비유 분석과 비유를 활용한 수업의 효과. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사 학위 논문.
- 박강훈, 이선경, 장남기 (1992). 생물의 에너지원에 관한 중등학교 학생들의 개념조사. 한국생물교육학회지, 20(2), 133-145.
- 변순화, 김경순, 최숙영, 노태희, 차정호 (2007). 화학 개념 학습에서 물리적 비유를 사용한 학생 중심 비유 수업의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(7), 631-638.
- 이원경, 김희백 (2007). 실험 결과 해석 과정에서 사용한 체계적 비유가 고등학생들의 효소 개념 변화에 미친 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(7), 663-675.
- 정영란, 강경리 (1998). 광합성의 기본 개념에 관한 학생들의 이해도 조사 및 오개념 분석. 한국생물교육학회지, 26(1), 1-7.
- 조희형 (1994). 잘못 알기 쉬운 과학개념. 서울: 전파과학사.
- 최경희 (2004). 제 6차.7차 초등학교 과학 교과서에 제시된 비유 비교 분석. 초등과학교육, 25(2),149-158.
- 최은규 (2004). 중학생들이 만든 비유의 유형 분석과 비유 만들기 수업의 효과. 서울대학교 대학원 석사 학위 논문.
- Aubusson, P. J., & Fogwill, S. (2006). Roleplay as analogical modelling in science. In P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison, & S. M. Ritchie(Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education, (pp. 91-102) Dordrecht: Springer.
- Baker, W. P., & Lawson, A. E. (1995). Effect of analogic instruction and reason level on achievement in general genetics. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 390 713.
- Boujaoude, S., & Tamin, R. (2000). Analogies generated by middle-school science students: types and usefulness. School Science Review, 82(299), 57-63.
- Brown A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT press/Bradford Books.
- Calik, M., & Ayas, A. (2005). An analogy activity for incorporating students' conceptions of types of solution. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 1-3.
- Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Example from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies on the philosophy of science (pp. 129-160). Minneapolis, MN:Univversity of Minnesota Press.
- Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Cognitive understanding levels. In A. E, Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-151). APA and Oxford University Press.
- Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750606
- Duit, R., Komorek, M., Wilbers, J., & Roth, W. (1997). Conceptual change during a unit on chaos theory induced by means of analogies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching.
- Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy, Trends in Cognitive Science, 5, 334-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01698-3
- Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science-related attitudes: Handbook. Hawthorn: The Austrian Council for Educational Research.
- Glynn, S. M. (1989). The teaching with analogies model: Explaining concepts in expository texts. In K. D. Muth (Ed.), Children' s comprehension of narrative and expository text: Research into practice (pp. 185-204). Neward, DE: International Reading Association.
- Glynn, S. M. (1991). Explanning science concepts: A teaching-with-analogies model. In S. Glynn, R. Yeany, & B. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 219-240). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Hand, B., Lawrence, C., & Yore, L. D. (1999). A writing in science framework designed to enhance science literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 1021-1035. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290165
- Hesse, M. (1996). Models and analogies in science. Notre Dame, IN: The University of Notre Dame Press.
- Hidi, S. (1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549-571. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
- Hofstader, D. (2003). Analogy as the central motor of discovery in physics. Paper presented at a Physics Department Colloquium, Ohio State University.
- Leatherdale, W. H. (1974). The Role of analogy, model and metaphor in science. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
- Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating Communities: Sociocultural Perspectives on Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200103)38:3<296::AID-TEA1007>3.0.CO;2-R
- Mason, L. (1994). Analogy, metaconceptual awareness and conceptual change: A classroom study. Educational Studies, 20, 267-292. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305569940200209
- Mason, L. (1995). Collaborative reasoning on self-generated analogies: Conceptual growth in understanding scientific phenomena. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 392 643)
- May, D. B., Hammer, D., & Roy, P. (2006). Children's analogical reasoning in a third grade science discussion. Science Education, 90(2), 316-330. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20116
- Mayo, J. A. (2001). Using analogies to teach conceptual applications of developmental theories. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 14, 187-213. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720530126292
- Orgill, M., & Bodner, G. (2004). What research tells us about using analogies to teach chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research and Practices, 5(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.1039/b3rp90028b
- Pittman, K. M. (1999). Student-generated analogies: Another way of knowing? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199901)36:1<1::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-2
- Richard, C., & Mashiho, Y. (2006). Acquisition of Procedures: The Effects of Example Elaborations and Active Learning Exercises. Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.02.002
- Roth, K. J. (1990). Developing meaningful conceptual understanding in science. In B. F. Jones & L. Idol (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, (pp. 139-176). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Thiele, R. B., & Treagust, D. F. (1991). Using analogies in secondary chemical teaching. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 37(2), 4-14.
- Tronson, D., & Ross, P. (2004). Modelling effective teaching and learning strategies with our teaching teams in first-year university. Australian Journal of Education in Chemistry, 63, 11-15.
- Tsai, C. C. (1999). Overcoming junior high school students' misconceptions about microscopic views of phase change: A study of an analogy activity. Journal of Science Eduction and Technology, 8(1), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009485722628
- Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1996). The Role of analogies in promoting conceptual change in biology. Instructional Science, 24(4), 295-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118053
- Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(9), 1031-1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199811)35:9<1031::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-E
- Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90018-3
- Weller, C. M. (1970). The role of analogy in teaching science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 986-1024.
- White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing Understanding. London: The Falmer Press.
- Wong, E. D. (1993). Self-generated analogies as a tool for constructing and evaluating explanations of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300405
- Zook, K. B., & Maier, J. M. (1994). Systematic analysis of variables that contribute to the formation of analogical misconceptions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(4), 589-600. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.86.4.589
피인용 문헌
- 초등학생의 학습접근양식에 따른 비유 만들기 특성, 대응 관계 이해도, 대응 오류, 비유 만들기에 대한 인식 vol.30, pp.5, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2010.30.5.668
- 초등 과학영재교육에서 포화용액 개념에 대한 소집단 비유 만들기의 효과 vol.55, pp.3, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2011.55.3.509
- Mapping Analysis of Scientific Concepts and Analogies Generated by Middle School Students about Light and Waves using Learning Materials for Generating Analogies vol.16, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2012.16.4.1189
- Development and Application of the Instruction Program for the ‘Defense Action' Chapter in Life ScienceⅠUtilizing Student Generated Role-Playing Analogy vol.41, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.1.97
- 과학적 문제해결을 위한 소집단 논의 과정에서 나타난 비유적 추론의 생성 수준과 설명적 모델 생성의 관계 분석 vol.33, pp.2, 2010, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.522
- 2009 개정 교육과정에 따른 중학교 과학 교과서의 화학 영역과 고등학교 화학 교과서에 사용된 비유의 분석 vol.57, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2013.57.6.801
- 학생 중심 비유를 사용한 예비과학교사의 수업에서 나타나는 특징 분석 vol.64, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.2.99