Imaging Science in Dentistry

  • 제40권3호
  • /
  • Pages.137-142
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 2233-7822(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2233-7830(eISSN)
대한영상치의학회 (Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology)
권호 표지

실험적 골 병소에 대한 콘빔형전산화단층영상과 초음파영상의 비교

Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and ultrasonography on experimental bone lesion

  • 김민성 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실) ;
  • 박철우 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실) ;
  • 김규태 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실) ;
  • 최용석 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실) ;
  • 황의환 (경희대학교 치의학전문대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실)
  • Kim, Min-Sung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Cheol-Woo (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Gyu-Tae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Yong-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Hwang, Eui-Hwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2010.07.29
  • 심사 : 2010.08.12
  • 발행 : 2010.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose : This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic ability of ultrasonography in detection of bone defects and new bone formation. Materials and Methods : Experimental bony defects were prepared on the parietal bone samples acquired from 3.5 kg New Zealand male rabbits. The defects were evaluated using ultrasonography and CBCT, and examined histologically at interval of 1, 3, 6, and 8 weeks. Results : Ultrasonograph demonstrated hyperechogenicity in the defect area at 3 weeks and broadened hyperechogenicity from the margin of bone defect at 6 and 8 weeks due to new bone formation. On the CBCT images, new bone formation was first observed at 3 weeks around the margin of the defect, and showed gradually increase at 6 and 8 weeks. Histologic findings revealed existence of the fibroblasts and fibrous connective tissue with abundant capillary vessels only at 1 week, but osteoid tissue and newly formed trabecular bone at 3 weeks. Bone remodeling in the defect area was observed at 6 weeks and increased calcification and dense trabecular bone formation was observed at 8 weeks. Conclusions : Ultrasonograph proved to be a very useful diagnostic tool in detecting the bony defect and new bone formation. Additionally, ultrasonography provided valuable information regarding the blood supply around the defect area.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, Lambrecht JT, Schneeberger P, Buser D. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104 : 503-10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1996.tb00133.x
  2. Frederiksen NL. Advanced imaging. In: White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Elsevier; 2009. p. 207-24.
  3. Lauria L, Curi MM, Chammas MC, Pinto DS, Torloni H. Ultrasonography evaluation of bone lesions of the jaw. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82 : 351-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(96)80365-9
  4. Tsiolis FI, Needleman IG, Griffiths GS. Periodontal ultrasonography. J Clin Periodontol 2003; 30 : 849-54. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.00380.x
  5. Hwang HZ, Kim GT, Choi YS, Hwang EH. Evaluation of normal masseter muscles on ultrasonography. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2008; 38 : 73-9.
  6. Imbeau J. Introduction to through-transmission alveolar ultrasonography (TAU) in dental medicine. Cranio 2005; 23 : 100-12.
  7. Emshoff R, Bertram S, Rudisch A, Gassner R. The diagnostic value of ultrasonography to determine temporomandibular joint disk position. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84 : 688-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90374-7
  8. Manfredini D, Tognini F, Melchiorre D, Cantini E, Bosco M. The role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disc displacement and intra-articular effusion. Minerva Stomatol 2003; 52 : 93-104.
  9. Kleinheinz J, Anastassov GE, Joos U. Ultrasonographic versus conventional diagnostic procedures in dislocated subcondylar mandibular fractures. J Craniomaxillofac Trauma 1997; 3 : 40-2.
  10. Cotti E, Campisi G, Garau V, Puddu G. A new technique for the study of periapical bone lesions: ultrasound real time imaging. Int Endod J 2002; 35 : 148-52. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00458.x
  11. Cotti E, Campisi G, Ambu R, Dettori C. Ultrasound real-time imaging in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2003; 36 : 556-63. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00690.x
  12. Gundappa M, Ng SY, Whaites EJ. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 35 : 326-33. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/60326577
  13. Bruno C, Minniti S, Buttura-da-Prato E, Albanese M, Nocini PF, Pozzi- Mucelli R. Gray-scale ultrasonography in the evaluation of bone callus in distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: initial findings. Eur Radiol 2008; 18 : 1012-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-0856-6
  14. Mukai-Higashihori K, Baba Y, Tetsumura A, Tsuji M, Ishizaki T, Higashihori N, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of new bone formation in maxillary distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008; 66 : 1750-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.08.036
  15. Selim H, Elbargothy N, Nabil Y, El-Hakim I. Evaluation of distracted mandibular bone using computed tomography scan and ultrasonography: technical note. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38 : 274-80. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/22907015
  16. Giorgio A, de Stefano G, Tarantino L, Perrotta A, Aloisio V, Forte G. Ultrasonography in diagnostic and therapeutic management of the abscesses due to Actinomyces spp. Infez Med 1997; 5 : 266-8.
  17. Gold L, Nazarian LN, Johar AS, Rao VM. Characterization of maxillofacial soft tissue vascular anomalies by ultrasound and color Doppler imaging: an adjuvant to computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61 : 19-31.
  18. Ariji Y, Sakuma S, Kimura Y, Kawamata A, Toyama M, Kurita K, et al. Colour Doppler sonographic analysis of blood-flow velocity in the human facial artery and changes in masseter muscle thickness during low-level static contraction. Arch Oral Biol 2001; 46 : 1059-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(01)00062-0
  19. Ahuja AT, King AD, Bradley MJ, Yeo WW, Mok TS, Metreweli C. Sonographic findings in masseter-muscle metastases. J Clin Ultrasound 2000; 28 : 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0096(200007/08)28:6<299::AID-JCU6>3.0.CO;2-1
  20. Chikui T, Yonetsu K, Yoshiura K, Miwa K, Kanda S, Ozeki S, et al. Imaging findings of lipomas in the orofacial region with CT, US, and MRI. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 84 : 88-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(97)90302-4
  21. Gritzmann N, Rettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Hubner E. Sonography of the salivary glands. Eur Radiol 2003; 13 : 964-75.
  22. Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Solbiati L, Rizzatto G, Silvestri E, Giannoni M. Color Doppler sonography of salivary glands. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 163 : 933-41. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.163.4.8092039
  23. Baker ML, Dalrymple GV. Biological effects of diagnostic ultrasound: a review. Radiology 1978; 126 : 479-83.