대한기계학회논문집A (Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A)

  • 제34권1호
  • /
  • Pages.55-60
  • /
  • 2010
  • /
  • 1226-4873(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-5226(eISSN)
대한기계학회 (The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

틸팅차량용 KTX 차체의 하니컴복합재 측벽판 체결부의 피로파괴평가

Fatigue Fracture Assessment of Honeycomb Composite Side-Wall Panel Joint for the KTX Tilting Car Body

  • 정달우 (한양대학교 기계공학과) ;
  • 김정석 (한국철도기술연구원 철도구조연구실) ;
  • 최낙삼 (한양대학교 기계공학과)
  • Jeong, Dal-Woo (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Jung-Seok (Railroad Structure Research Department, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Choi, Nak-Sam (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 발행 : 2010.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

틸팅형 고속열차의 차체에 적용되는 하니컴 복합재 조인트 구조물의 경우 운행중 외팔보형 굽힘하중을 받게된다. 하이브리드 복합재 조인트 구조물에 대한 굽힘시험평가를 수행하기 위해 실제 틸팅열차 차체 구조물에서 조인트부를 절단 채취하여 시험편으로 제작하였다. 굽힘시험결과 시험편의 파괴거동은 정적하중과 피로하중하에서 확연히 달라짐을 보였다. 정적굽힘하중 하에서는 하니컴 코어 영역에서 전단변형과 파괴가 발생하였으며, 피로굽힘하중 하에서는 복합재 표피층과 하니컴 코어층 사이에서 계면분리가 발생하거나, 또는 금속재 언더프레임과의 용접부에서 파괴가 발생하였다. 이러한 파괴거동은 다른 산업분야에서 사용되는 유사한 구조의 하니컴 복합재 조인트 구조물에서도 발생할 수 있기 때문에, 본 실험 결과를 하니컴 복합재 조인트 구조물의 설계변수를 개선하기 위해 이용될 수 있다.

The honeycomb composite joint structure designed for application to a tilting KTX railroad car body is subjected to bending loads of a cantilever type. Honeycomb sandwich composite panel-joint attached in the real tilting car body was fabricated and sectioned as several beam-joint specimens for the bending test. The fracture behaviors of these specimens under static loads were different from those under cyclic loads. Static bending loads caused shear deformation and fracture in the honeycomb core region, while fatigue cyclic bend loading caused delamination along the interface between the composite skin and the honeycomb core, and/or caused a fracture in the welded part jointed with the steel under-frame. These fracture behaviors could occur in other industrial honeycomb composite joints with similar sub-structures, and be used for improving design parameters of a honeycomb composite joint structure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Li, B. and Fatemi, A., 2006, “An Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Fatigue Behavior of Coach Peel Riveted Joints,” International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 9-18 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2005.04.003
  2. Shin, K. B. and Lee, S. J., 2004, “The Case and Technique on Lightweight of Railway Vehicle System using Composite Materials,” Korea Society for Composite Materials, Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 82-86
  3. Shin, K. B. and Lee, S. J., 2005, “A Study on Manufacturing Technology of Hybrid Composite Carbody Structures Using Autoclave Molding Process,” Korean Society for Composite Materials, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 52-58
  4. Lim, T. S., Kim, B. C. and Lee. D. G., 2006, “Fatigue Characteristics of the Bolted Joints for Unidirectional Composite Laminates,” Composite Structures, Vol. 72, pp. 58-68 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.10.013
  5. Kelly, G., 2006,“Quasi-Static Strength and Fatigue Life of Hybrid(Bonded/Bolted)Composite Single-Lap Joints,” Composite Structures, Vol. 72. pp. 119-129 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.11.002
  6. Xiao, Y. and Ishikawa, T., 2005, “Bearing Strength and Failure Behavior of Bolted Composite Joints. Part I: Experimental Investigation,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 65, pp. 1022-1031 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.02.011
  7. Counts, W. A. and Johnson, W. S., 2002, “Bolt Bearing Fatigue of Polymer Matrix Composites at Elevated Temperature.” International Journal of Fatigue, Vol. 24, pp. 197-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00073-1
  8. Herrington, P. D. and Sabbaghian, M., 1993, “Fatigue Failure of Composite Bolted Joints,” Journal of composite Material, Vol. 27, pp. 491-512 https://doi.org/10.1177/002199839302700503
  9. Thoppul, S. D., Finegan, J. and Gibson, R. F., 2009, “Mechanics of Mechanically Fastened Joints in Polymer–Matrix Composite Structures – A Review,” Composites Science and Technology, Vol. 69, No. 3-4, pp. 301-329 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.09.037
  10. Caccese, V., Kabche, J. P. and Berube, K. A., 2007, “Analysis of a Hybrid Composite/Metal Bolted Connection Subjected to Flexural Loading,” Composite Structures, Vol. 81, No. 3, pp. 450-462 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.09.009
  11. Mottram, J. T. and Zheng, Y., 1996, “State-of-theart Review on the Design of Beam-to-Column Connections for Pultruded Frames,” Composite Structures, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 387-401 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(96)00052-9
  12. Lemonis, M. E. and Gantes, C. J., 2009, “Mechanical Modeling of the Nonlinear Response of Beam-to-Column Joints,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, No. 4, pp. 879-890 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.11.007
  13. Wang, W. D., Han, L. H. and Zhao, X. L., 2009, “Analytical Behavior of Frames with Steel Beams to Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Column,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 497-508 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.11.002
  14. Granata, P. J. and Parvin, A., 2001, “An Experimental Study on Kevlar Strengthening of Beam–Column Connections,” Composite Structures, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 163-171 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8223(00)00187-2
  15. Kim, B. J. and Lee, D. G., 2008, “Characteristics of Joining Inserts for Composite Sandwich Panels,” Composite Structures, Vol. 86, No. 1-3, pp. 55-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2008.03.020
  16. Jung,D.W., Choi,N.S., Kim,J.S., Seo,S.I., Jo,S.H., 2007, “Static and Fatigue Fracture Assessment of hybrid Composite Joint for the Tilting Car Body,” Transactions of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers Part A, Vol.31, No.2, pp.166-173 https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-A.2007.31.2.166
  17. The European Standard EN12663, 2000, Railway Applications-Structural Requirements of Railway Vehicle Bodies, European Committee for Standardization
  18. The UIC Code 566OR, 3rd edition of 1.1.90, 2003, Loadings of Coach Bodies and Their Components, International Union of Railways