KSCE Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering Research (대한토목학회논문집)

Korean Society of Civil Engeneers (대한토목학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The hydrologic flux of SS, TN and TP in Nakdong River Basin

낙동강 유역 SS, TN, TP 수문학적 플럭스

  • Received : 2010.03.29
  • Accepted : 2010.04.28
  • Published : 2010.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study presents the export of constituent transport loads through a river system. The proposed constituent transport load estimating procedure can be operated with the on-going Korean TMDL monitoring system. This study firstly discusses the use of a hydrologic simulation model (TANK) to estimate stream-flow for the 40 sub-catchments. Model parameters are estimated from 8-days intervals flow data which has been monitored by NIER since 2004. Constituent transport loads are estimated with the 7-parameter log linear model whose parameters are estimated by the minimum variance unbiased estimator. Results from Nakdong river basin reveals that the proposed procedure provides satisfactory TN, TP and SS transport load estimates. As an application, a representative load duration curve is derived to represent the overall hydrologic flux of TN, TP and SS at Nakdong river basin.

본 연구에서는 현재 시행되고 있는 수질오염총량관리제 모니터링 시스템에 적용가능한 하천 오염부하량 추정기법을 제안하고 있다. 하도추적기능과 증발산량 계산 기능을 추가한 수정 TANK 모형을 이용하여 국립환경과학원에서 8일 간격으로 관측된 유량자료를 일 유량 자료로 확장하였다. 관측된 수질-유량 동시관측자료를 이용하여 7변수 대수선형모형의 매개변수를 최소분산 비편향 추정기법에 의해 추정하였다. 확장된 일 유량자료와 7변수 대수선형모형의 결과가 연계되어 관측지점별일 오염부하량이 계산되었다. 그 결과 SS, TN, TP 하천 오염부하량 추정에서 만족스러운 결과를 확인할 수 있었다. 적용의 일환으로 낙동강유역을 대표할 수 있는 SS, TN 및 TP 수질항목별 대표 단위면적당 부하량 유황곡선을 작성하였으며, 이를 통하여 낙동강 유역의 전체적인 하천오염부하량의 배출분포를 살펴보았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 한수희, 강두기, 신현석, 유재정, 김상단(2007a) 비편향 회귀분석 모형을 이용한 낙동강 본류 부유사량 산정방법의 신뢰도 향상, 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 한국물환경학회, 제23권, pp. 251-259.
  2. 한수희, 신현석, 김상단(2007b) 낙동강 유역관리를 위한 부하량 유황곡선의 적용 가능성, 수질보전 한국물환경학회지, 한국물환경학회지, 제23권 pp. 620-627.
  3. Chon, T.A., DeLong, L.L., Gilroy, E.J., Hirsch, R.M., and Wells, D.K. (1989) Estimating constituent loads, Water Resour. Res., Vol. 25, No. 5, pp. 937-942. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR025i005p00937
  4. Chon, T.A., Caulder, D.L., Gilroy, E.J., Zynjuk, L.D., and Summers. R.M. (1992) The validity of a simple statistical model for estimating fluvial constituent loads: An empirical study involving nutrient loads entering Chesapeake Bay, Water Resour. res., Vol. 28, No. 9, pp. 2353-2364. https://doi.org/10.1029/92WR01008
  5. Chon, T.A. (1995) Recent advances in statistical methods for the estimation of sediment and nutrient transport in rivers, U.S. Natl. Rep. Int. Union Geod, Geophys. 1991-1994, Rev. Geophys., Vol. 33, pp. 1117-1124. https://doi.org/10.1029/95RG00292
  6. Chon, T.A. (2005) Estimating contaminant loads in rivers: AN application of adjusted maximum likelihood to type 1 censored data, Water Resour. res., Vol. 41, No. 7, pp. W07003.1-W07003.13.
  7. Colby, B.R. (1995) The relationship of sediment discharge to streamflow, technical report, U.S. Geol, Surv., Reston, Va,.
  8. Finney, D.J.(1941) On the Distribution of a Variate Whose Logarithm Normally Distributed, J. R. Stat. Soc. Suppl., Vol. 7, pp. 155-161. https://doi.org/10.2307/2983663
  9. Government Accountability Office (2003), Water quality: Improved EPA guidance and support can help states develop standards that better target cleanup efforts, Tech. Rep. GAO-03-308, Washington, D.C.
  10. Miller, C.R. (1951) Analysis of flow-duration, sediment-rating curve method of computing sediment yield, technical report, U.S. Bur. of Reclam., Washington, D.C.
  11. Nash, J.E. and Sutcliffe, J.V. (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part 1-A discussion of principles, Journal of Hydrology, Vol. 10, pp. 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  12. National Research Council (2001), Assessing the TMDL Approach to Water Quality Management, 109 pp., Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, D.C.