DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Rice Properties Between Rice Grown Under Conventional Farming and One Grown Under Eco-Friendly Farming Using Hairy Vetch

친환경 무농약 재배와 관행 재배 쌀의 특성비교

  • Lee, Seung-Hyun (Dept. of Food and Nutrition, Human Ecology Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Min-Young (Dept. of Food and Nutrition, Human Ecology Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Han-Yong (Plant Science Major, Division of Plant Biotechnology, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Ko, Sang-Hoon (Dept. of Food Science and Biotechnology, Sejong University) ;
  • Shin, Mal-Shick (Dept. of Food and Nutrition, Human Ecology Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
  • 이승현 (전남대학교 식품영양학과, 생활과학연구소) ;
  • 김민영 (전남대학교 식품영양학과, 생활과학연구소) ;
  • 김한용 (전남대학교 식물생명공학부 응용식물학) ;
  • 고상훈 (세종대학교 식품공학과) ;
  • 신말식 (전남대학교 식품영양학과, 생활과학연구소)
  • Received : 2010.07.29
  • Accepted : 2010.09.20
  • Published : 2010.11.30

Abstract

The properties of non-waxy rice, Dongjin 1, cultivated with conventional farming (CF) and environmentally-harmonized farming (EHF) using hairy vetch were compared to determine rice water absorption, physicochemical and pasting properties, antioxidant activities of brown and white rice, and a sensory evaluation of cooked white rice was carried out. EHF was treated with green manure crops such as hairy vetch and chitinase, which produce microorganism culture solution. CF was applied with seed disinfection treatments, fertilizer herbicides, and agricultural chemicals for the control of pests and diseases. The absorption level of EHF rice was higher than that of CF rice grain, regardless of the cultivation methods used. The ash and crude lipid contents were higher, but protein and dietary fiber contents were lower in the CF rice than in the EHF rice. The total starch content, water binding capacity, and swelling power of white rice were higher than those of brown rice, regardless of the cultivation methods used. The DPPH's antioxidant activity was shown as follows: EHF brown rice, EHF white rice and CF rice, in a decreasing order. The initial pasting temperature of EHF rice was lower than that of CF rice, but the peak, cold, and breakdown viscosities exhibited reverse trends. The sensory evaluation showed that the cooked white rice cultivated with EHF was not significantly different from that cultivated with CF (p<0.05). The overall preference of cooked rice did not show significant differences between the two cultivation methods (p<0.05).

일반 멥쌀인 동진1호 품종으로 녹비작물인 헤어리베치를 이용하여 친환경 무농약 재배와 관행 재배한 쌀로 현미와 백미로 도정하여 수분흡수력, 이화학적 특성과 호화특성 및 밥의 관능평가를 실시한 결과 다음과 같다. 쌀알의 수분흡수력은 친환경 재배 쌀이 도정에 관계없이 모두 높았으며 단백질과 식이섬유는 친환경재배 쌀이 회분과 지방질은 관행재배 쌀이 더 높았고 현미가 백미보다 높았다. 총 전분함량, 물결합능력, 팽윤력은 백미가 현미에 비해 높았으며 재배방법에 따른 차이는 거의 없었다. DPPH에 의한 항산화 활성은 친환경재배 현미가 가장 높고 친환경 백미 관행재배 쌀순이었다. 쌀가루 호화액의 초기 호화온도는 현미보다는 백미, 관행재배보다는 친환경재배 쌀이 더 낮았고 피크 점도는 반대 경향을 보여 친환경재배 백미가 가장 높은 점도를 나타냈다. 밥의 관능평가 결과 관행재배와 친환경재배 모두 차이조사와 기호조사에서 유의적인 차이를 보이지 않았다(p<0.05). 이로부터 친환경재배 쌀의 가공적성이 더 좋은 가능성을 보이는 것으로 추정되며 밥을 지었을 때는 두 재배방법간 차이가 거의 없음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Song JY, Shin M. 2007. Effects of soaking and particle sizes on the properties of rice flour and gluten-free rice bread. Food Sci Biotechnol 16: 759-764.
  2. Kadan RS, Bryant RJ, Miller JA. 2008. Effects of milling on functional properties of rice flour. J Food Sci 73: E151-E154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2008.00720.x
  3. Lee MH, Lee YT. 2006. Properties of gluten-free rice breads using different rice flours prepared by dry-, wet-, and semi wet milling. Food Eng 10: 180-185.
  4. Bocevska M, Aldabas I, Andreevska D, Ilieva V. 2009. Gelatinization behavior of grains and flour in relation to physicochemical properties of milled rice (Oryza sativa L.) J Food Quality 32: 108-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2008.00239.x
  5. Lin CF, Wang YT, Wu JSB. 2009. Modification in physical properties of rice gel by microbial transglutaminase. J Sci Food Agric 89: 477-481. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3476
  6. Statistics Korea. www.kostst.go.kr. 2010. Household per Capita Food Grain Consumption in 2009
  7. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 2008. Release Copy. Vitalization Plan for Rice Processed Foods.
  8. Chung NJ, Park JH, Kim KJ, Kim JK. 2005. Effect of head rice ratio on rice palatability. Korean J Crop Sci 50: 29-32.
  9. National Institute of Crop Science, Rural Development Administration. www.nics.go.kr. 2010. The Highest Quality Rice Production Technology.
  10. Park JH, Nam SH, Kim YO, Kwon OD, An KN. 2010. Comparison of quality, physicochemical and functional property between organic and conventional rice. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 39: 725-730. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2010.39.5.725
  11. Lee SG, Lee YH, Kim JS, Lee BM, Kim MJ, Shin JH, Kim HM, Choi DH. 2005. Diseases and weeds occurrence and control in organic and conventional rice paddy field. Korean J Organic Agric 13: 291-300.
  12. Kim SY, Oh SH, Hwang WH, Choi KJ, Park ST, Kim JI, Yeo US, Kang HW. 2009. Growth, rice yield and edible quality of rice under naturally reseeded Chinese milk vetch cropping system. Korean J Crop Sci 54: 351-356.
  13. Won JG, Ahn DJ, Kim SJ, Choi CD, Lee SC. 2008. Effect of rice bran application times on weeds control, rice yield and grain quality. Korean J Crop Sci 53: 382-387.
  14. Rural Development Adminstration National Institute Crop Science. 2008. Understanding of Environment-Friendly Agriculture and Production Technology Environmentally-Friendly Rice's Production Technology Using a Green Manure Crop. p 19-25.
  15. AACC. 2000. Approved Methods of the AACC. 10th ed. American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, MN, USA.
  16. AOAC. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC, USA.
  17. Williams PC, Kuzina FD, Hlynka I. 1970. A rapid colorimetric procedure for estimating the amylose content of starches and flours. Cereal Chem 47: 411-420.
  18. Kim JM, Song JY, Shin M. 2010. Physicochemical properties of high amylose rice starches purified from Korean cultivars. Starke/Starch 62: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201090001
  19. Medcalf F, Gilles KA. 1965. I. Comparison of physicochemical properties. Cereal Chem 42: 558-568.
  20. Schoch TJ. 1964. Swelling power and solubility of granular starches. In Method in Carbohydrate Chemistry. Whistler RL, ed. Academic Press, New York, USA. p 106-108.
  21. Woo KS, Jeong EG, Suh SJ, Yang CI, Jeong HS, Kim KJ. 2008. Antioxidant components and antioxidant activities of 70% ethanol extracts on Suweon-511 and Ilpum rice. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 37: 1223-1230. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2008.37.10.1223
  22. Na GS, Lee SK, Kim SY. 2007. Antioxidative effects and quality characteristics of the rice cultivated by organic farming and ordinary farming. J Kor Soc Appl Biol Chem 50: 36-41.
  23. Hwang J, Hur WD, Nam GB, Sur DW, Choi KA, Eum SY, Lim SM. 2006. Study on component and quality assessment of environment-friendly produced foods. Korea Food Research Institute Report. p 69-83.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Physicochemical Properties and Cooking Quality of Korean Organic Rice Varieties vol.29, pp.6, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2013.29.6.785
  2. Chemical Components and Quality Characteristics of Waxy Corns Cultured by Conventional and Environmentally-Friendly Methods vol.40, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2011.40.7.962
  3. Study on Cooking Properties of ‘Bodeurami’ Rice Cultivar vol.33, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2017.33.2.209
  4. Physicochemical Properties of High Yielding Non-waxy Rice Flours Extruded with Different Moisture Contents vol.27, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2011.27.6.745
  5. The Physicochemical Characteristics of Rice Flour with Different Milling Degree of Rice Cultivar "Deuraechan" vol.30, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.9724/kfcs.2014.30.2.139
  6. Physicochemical Properties of Extruded Rice Flour and Gelatinization Popped Rice Flour vol.25, pp.4, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2012.25.4.850
  7. Physicochemical properties of aromatic rice prepared using different milling recoveries and roasting procedures vol.25, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11002/kjfp.2018.25.3.289
  8. A Comparison of Rheological Measurement Methods of Instant Cooked Rice by a Texture Analyzer vol.22, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13050/foodengprog.2018.22.4.381
  9. 음료가공을 위한 쌀 품종별 품질 특성 비교 vol.30, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2017.30.6.1260