The thickness of facial and palatal bone of maxillary anterior natural teeth: radiographic analysis using computed tomography

전산화 단층 촬영을 이용한 상악 전치부 자연치의 순측과 구개측 골의 두께 계측

  • Bae, Soo-Yong (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Sohn, Joo-Yeon (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Um, Yoo-Jung (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research institute of periodontal regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 배수용 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 박정철 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 손주연 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 엄유정 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 정의원 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 김창성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 조규성 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 채중규 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 김종관 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소) ;
  • 최성호 (연세대학교 치과대학 치주과학교실, 치주조직재생연구소)
  • Published : 2009.10.01

Abstract

Purpose : Anterior region is crucial area for esthetic implant restoration. However, the alveolar process undergoes atrophy after removal of teeth and creates unfavorable situation for implant installation. The knowledge of the thickness of alveolar bone is required to estimate and expect the bone resorption after extraction. The aim of this study is to measure facial, palatal and faciopalatal bone thickness on maxillary anterior teeth. Methods : Facial, palatal, and faciopalatal bone thickness were measured on the computed tomography (CT) images from 57 patients, using an image analyzer program (Ondemand$3D^{(R)}$, Cybermed, Seoul, Korea). Results : The thickness of facial bone in incisors, lateral incisors and canines were less than 1 mm. The thickness of facial bone increased from anterior to posterior region and the thickness of palatal bone increased from posterior to anterior region. Conclusion : The measurement can be used for planning implant surgery before extraction. CT has are clinically useful in the evaluation of thickness of alveolar bone.

Keywords

References

  1. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:971-973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1996.tb00520.x
  2. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lindhe J. Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants:an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:925-932. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00747.x
  3. Henriksson K, Jemt T. Measurements of soft tissue volume in association with single-implant restorations:a 1-year comparative study after abutment connection surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:181-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00034.x
  4. Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction:a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:313-323.
  5. Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x
  6. Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets:an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:645-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00726.x
  7. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A et al. I㎜ediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol 2001;72:1560-1571. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1560
  8. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following i㎜ediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:820-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x
  9. Qahash M, Susin C, Polimeni G, Hall J, Wikesjo UM. Bone healing dynamics at buccal peri-implant sites. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:166-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01428.x
  10. Araujo MG, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:606-614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01315.x
  11. Spray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response:stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000;5:119-128. https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.119
  12. Kim HJ, Yun HS, Park HD, Kim DH, Park YC. Soft?tissue and cortical-bone thickness at orthodontic implant sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:177-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.12.024
  13. Kang S, Lee SJ, Ahn SJ, Heo MS, Kim TW. Bone thickness of the palate for orthodontic miniimplant anchorage in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:S74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.029
  14. Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K et al. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:721 e727-712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.026
  15. Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS et al. Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa:the use of computerized tomography. J Periodontol 2008;79:406-412. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2008.070302
  16. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M et al. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:373-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00565-1
  17. Frankle KT, Seibel W, Dumsha TC. Anatomical study of the position of the mesial roots of mandibular molars. J Endod 1990;16:480-485. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80177-4
  18. Jin GC, Kim KD, Roh BD, Lee CY, Lee SJ. Buccal bone plate thickness of the Asian people. J Endod 2005;31:430-434. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.don.0000145430.35906.fa
  19. Miyamoto I, Tsuboi Y, Wada E, Suwa H, Iizuka T. Influence of cortical bone thickness and implant length on implant stability at the time of surgeryclinical, prospective, biomechanical, and imaging study. Bone 2005;37:776-780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.019
  20. Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M et al. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008;78:387-395. https://doi.org/10.2319/122106-52.1
  21. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, Miller AJ, Hatcher DC. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography imaging with physical measures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:80-93. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/31349994
  22. Choi SC, Ann CH, Choi HM, Heo MS, Lee SS. Accuracy of reformatted CT image for measuring the pre-implant site:analysis of the image distortion related to the gantry angle change. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31:273-277. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600702
  23. Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following tooth extraction. Aust Dent J 1969;14:241-244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1969.tb06001.x
  24. Carlsson GE, Persson G. Morphologic changes of the mandible after extraction and wearing of dentures. A longitudinal, clinical, and x-ray cephalometric study covering 5 years. Odontol Revy 1967;18:27-54.
  25. Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers:a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90188-6
  26. Covani U, Bortolaia C, Barone A, Sbordone L. Bucco-lingual crestal bone changes after i㎜ediate and delayed implant placement. J Periodontol 2004;75:1605-1612. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2004.75.12.1605
  27. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Buser D, Lindhe J. The jumping distance revisited:An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x
  28. Cody DD, Flynn MJ, Vickers DS. A technique for measuring regional bone mineral density in human lumbar vertebral bodies. Med Phys 1989;16:766-772. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596430
  29. Spoor CF, Zonneveld FW, Macho GA. Linear measurements of cortical bone and dental enamel by computed tomography:applications and problems. Am J Phys Anthropol 1993;91:469-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330910405
  30. Silva MJ, Wang C, Keaveny TM, Hayes WC. Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate. Bone 1994;15:409-414. https://doi.org/10.1016/8756-3282(94)90817-6