Analysis of genetic diversity of cowpea landraces from Korea determined by Simple Sequence Repeats and establishment of a core collection

  • Received : 2009.08.11
  • Published : 20091200

Abstract

Cowpea might have been introduced from China to Korea and cultivated for several hundred years but it has never been a staple food crop in Korea. In this study, genetic diversity of 492 Korean cowpea landrace accessions that have passport information was estimated using six SSR markers. The mean of Weir's gene diversity was 0.665 from all accessions investigated in the study. Cowpea gene diversity of six local provinces in Korea was ranged from 0.370 in accessions of Gangwon to 0.680 in Jeonra provinces. Low gene diversity of the cowpea genepool of Gangwon province was probably derived from relatively few introductions. Especially SSR markers VM36 and VM39 seem to be good markers to distinguish the Gangwon accessions from others by occurring at a specific locus with higher than 78% of allele frequency. Except for the Gangwon province with the low genetic diversity, gene diversity of cowpea accessions from other provinces was ranged from 0.600 to 0.680 indicating no big differences among provinces. Distribution pattern of the allele frequencies was similar among the other provinces. This may reveal that Korean farmers might exchange cowpea seeds easily with even their neighbors with geographical barriers. A core collection, 100 landraces, ca. 20% of base collection, was developed at the 70% of a similarity coefficient level using random sampling approaches after stratification of the entire landrace collection based on the phenetic dendrogram. The variability of SSR in the base and core collections of Korean cowpea landrace was compared by calculating Weir's gene diversity. The mean of Weir's gene diversity of the core was 0.707 while that of the base collection was 0.665. The higher diversity index in the core collection indicates that it maintains the initial variability and well represents the base collection. The core collection included one of determinate accession (IT 216155) and two of no branching type accessions (IT 103959 and IT 161024). The core collection could be used to guide more efficient management and utilization of the entire collection. This core collection should be revised periodically as additional accessions are collected and further characterization is conducted.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown AHD, 1989. Core collections: a practical approach to genetic resources management. Genome 31:818-824 https://doi.org/10.1139/g89-144
  2. Diwan N, Cregan PB, 1997. Automated sizing of fluorescent- labeled simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to assay genetic variation in soybean. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 95:723-733 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220050618
  3. Don RH, Cox PT, Waninwright BJ, Baker K, Mattick JS, 1991. Touchdown PCR to prevent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Research 19:4008 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/19.14.4008
  4. Ehlers JD, Hall AE, 1997. Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp.). Field Crops Research 53:187-204 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00031-2
  5. Fatokun CA, Danesh D, Young ND, Stewart EL, 1993. Molecular taxonomic relationships in the genus Vigna based on RFLP analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 97-104 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00223813
  6. Fotso M, Azanza J-L, Pasquet R, Raymond J, 1994. Molecular heterogeneity of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata Fabaceae) seed storage proteins. Plant Systematics and Evolution 191:39-56 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00985341
  7. Frankel OH, 1984. Genetic perspective of germplasm conservation. W. A, K. L, W.J. P, P. S, eds. Genetic Manipulations: Impact on Man and Society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 161-170
  8. Gillaspie JAG, Hopkins Jr. MS, Dean RE, 2005. Determining genetic diversity between lines of Vigna unguiculata subspecies by AFLP and SSR markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 52:245-247 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-004-6693-9
  9. Kobiljski B, Quarrie S, Dencic S, Kirby J, Ivege M, 2002. Genetic Diversity of the Novi Sad Wheat Core Collection Revealed by Microsatellites. Cellular and Molecular Biology Letters 7:685-694
  10. Lee J, Baek H-J, Yoon M-s, Kim C-Y, Cho E-G, 2005. Taxonomic review and genetic diversity of cowpea species and related taxa. Korean Journal of Breeding 37:187-191
  11. Li C-D, Fatokun CA, Ubi B, Singh BB, Scoles GJ, 2001. Determining genetic similarities and relationships among cowpea breeding lines and cultivars by microsatellite markers. Crop Science 41:189-197 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2001.411189x
  12. Panella L, Gepts P, 1992. Genetic relationshp within Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. based on isozyme analyses. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 39:71-88 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051226
  13. Pasquet R, 1999. Genetic relationships among subspecies of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. based on allozyme variation. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 98:1104-1119 https://doi.org/10.1007/s001220051174
  14. Pasquet RS, 1993. Classification infraspecifique des formes spontanees de Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. (Fabaceae) a partir de donnees morphologiques. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 62:127-173 https://doi.org/10.2307/3668271
  15. Rohlf FJ, 1998. NTSYS-pc, numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system v.2.11: Exeter Publishing, Ltd., Setauket, New York
  16. Shashidhara G, Hema MV, Koshy B, Farooqi AA, 2003. Assessment of genetic diversity and identification of core collection in sandalwood germplasm using RAPDs. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 78:528-536
  17. Steele WM, Mehra KL, 1980. Structure, evolution, and adaptation to farming systems and environments in Vigna. Bunting AH, ed. Advances in Legume Systematics. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens, 393-404
  18. Tohme J, Jones P, Beebe S, Iwanaga M, 1995. The combined use of agroecological and characterization data to establish the CIAT Phaseolus vulgaris core collection. T. H, D. BAH, L. HvTJ, V MEA, eds. Core collections of plant genetic resources. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, 95-107
  19. Upadhyaya HD, Ortiz R, Bramel PJ, Singh S, 2003. Development of a groundnut core collection using taxonomical, geographical and morphological descriptors. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 50:139-148 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022945715628
  20. Vaillancourt RE, Weeden NF, 1993. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny of old workd Vigna (Leguminosae). Systematic Botany 18:642-651 https://doi.org/10.2307/2419538
  21. Vaillancourt RE, Weeden NF, Barnard J, 1993. Isozyme Diversity in the Cowpea Species Complex. Crop Science 33:606-613 https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300030037x
  22. Weir BS, 1996. Genetic data analysis II : methods for discrete population genetic data. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer-Assocs
  23. Yoon M-S, Lee J, Baek H-J, Cho G-T, Kim C-Y, Cho Y-H, Kim T-S, Cho E-G, 2007. SSR Profiling and Its Variation in Soybean Germplasm. Korean Journal of Crop Sciences 52:1-8