Influence of Gas Composition and Treatment Time on the Surface Properties of AISI 316L Austenitic Stainless Steels During Low-Temperature Plasma Nitrocarburizing Treatment

AISI 316L강의 저온 플라즈마침질탄화처리 시 가스조성과 처리시간이 표면특성에 미치는 영향

  • Lee, In-Sup (Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Dongeui University)
  • Received : 2009.03.25
  • Published : 2009.11.25

Abstract

The major drive for the application of low-temperature plasma treatment in nitrocarburizing of austenitic stainless steels lies in improved surface hardness without degraded corrosion resistance. The low-temperature plasma nitrocarburizing was performed in a gas mixture of $N_{2}$, $H_{2}$, and carbon-containing gas such as $CH_{4}$ at $450^{\circ}C$. The influence of the processing time (5~30 h) and $N_{2}$ gas composition (15~35%) on the surface properties of the nitrocarburized layer was investigated. The resultant nitrocarburized layer was a dual-layer structure, which was comprised of a N-enriched layer (${\gamma}_N$) with a high nitrogen content on top of a C-enriched layer (${\gamma}_C$) with a high carbon content, leading to a significant increase in surface hardness. The surface hardness reached up to about $1050HV_{0.01}$, which is about 4 times higher than that of the untreated sample ($250HV_{0.01}$). The thickness of the hardened layer increased with increasing treatment time and $N_{2}$ gas level in the atmosphere and reached up to about $25{\mu}m$. In addition, the corrosion resistance of the treated samples without containing $Cr_{2}N$ precipitates was enhanced than that of the untreated samples due to a high concentration of N on the surface. However, longer treatment time (25% $N_{2}$, 30 h) and higher $N_{2}$ gas composition (35% $N_{2}$, 20 h) resulted in the formation of $Cr_{2}N$ precipitates in the N-enriched layer, which caused the degradation of corrosion resistance.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국학술진흥재단

References

  1. John Sedriks, Corrosion of stainless steels, p.16, John Wiley & Sons, 2nd ed., New York (1996)
  2. M. Tsujikawa, S. Noguchi, N. Yamauchi, N. Ueda, and T. Sone, Surf. & Coat. Tech. 201, 5102 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.07.127
  3. T. Bell, Y. Sun, and A. Suhadi, Vacuum. 59, 14 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-207X(00)00250-5
  4. Y. Sun, Mater. Lett. 59, 3410 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.005
  5. Y. Sun and E. Haruman, Vacuum. 81, 114 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2006.03.003
  6. C. Blawert, H. Kalvelage, B. L. Mordike, G. A. Collins, and K. T. Short, Surf. & Coat. Tech. 136, 181 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(00)01050-1
  7. Insup Lee, J. Kor. Inst. Met. & Mater. 46, 357 (2008)
  8. T.-H. Lee and S.-J. Kim, J. Kor. Inst. Met. & Mater. 35, 1146 (1997)
  9. Z. Cheng, C. X. Li, H. Dong, and T. Bell, Surf. & Coat. Tech. 191, 195 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.004
  10. Y. Sun, Mater. Proc. Tech. 168, 189 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.10.005
  11. H. Baba, T. Kodama, and Y. Katada, Corros. Sci. 44, 2393 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-938X(02)00040-9
  12. B. Larisch, U. Brusky, and H.-J. Spies, Surf. and Coat. Tech. 116-119, 205 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00084-5