References
- 박미희, 박용규 (2007). COHEN의 합치도의 두 가지 역설을 해결하기 위한 새로운 합치도의 제안, <응용통계연구>, 20, 117-132 https://doi.org/10.5351/KJAS.2007.20.1.117
- Bennet, E. M. and Alpert, R. and Goldstein, A. C. (1954). Communications through limited response questioning, Public Opinion Quarterly, 18, 303-308 https://doi.org/10.1086/266520
- Cicchetti, D. V., Lee, C., Fontana, A. F. and Dowds, B. N. (1978). A computer program for assessing specific category rater agreement for qualitative data, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 805-813 https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447803800322
- Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales, Educational and Psychological Measure-ment, 20, 37-46 https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104
- Feinstein, A, R. and Cicchetti, D. V. (1990). High agreement but low kappa: 1. The problems of two paradoxes, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 43, 543-549 https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L
- Gwet, K. (2001). Handbook of inter-rater reliability. STATAXIS Publishing company, Gaithersburg
- Holley, J. W. and Guiiford, J. P. (1964). A note on the G index of agreement, Educational and Psycholog-ical Measurement, 24, 749-753 https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446402400402
- Janson, S. and Vegelius, J. (1979). On generalizations of the G index and the phi coefficient to nominal scales, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 255-269 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1402_9
- Scott, W. A. (1955). Reliability of content analysis: The case of nominal scale coding, Public Opinion Quarterly, 19, 321-325 https://doi.org/10.1086/266577