Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Importance Analysis of SCM Adoption Factors

SCM 도입 요인 중요도 분석

  • Kim, Wou-Yong (Division of Management Information System, Hoseo Graduate School of Venture) ;
  • Yang, Hea-Sool (Division of Management Information System, Hoseo Graduate School of Venture)
  • 김우용 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 정보경영학과) ;
  • 양해술 (호서대학교 벤처대학원 정보경영학과)
  • Published : 2009.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the importances of various SCM adoption factors suggested in precedent researches with AHP. SCM adoption factors were categorized by four types: organization factor, transaction factor, relation factor, and information factor. Each factor has sub-factors. Organization factor has five sub-factors: adoption strategy, support of CEO, maturity of information technology, development of assessment system, and innovation leadership. Transaction factor has three sub-factors: transaction period, delivery/quality, and shared goal. Relation factor has five sub-factors: trust, collaboration, inter-dependence, conflict, and immersion. Information factor has three sub-factors: information quality, information share, and information exchange. There are sixteen sub-factors altogether. Analyzing the importances of SCM adoption factors with AHP, the importance of organization factor(.387) ranked the highest. Relation factor(.291), information factor(.167), and transaction factor(.155) followed. Putting the analysis results of primary hierarchy factors and secondary hierarchy factors together, support of CEO(.169) ranked the highest and trust(.124), adoption strateg (.089), share goal(.081), information exchange(.069), collaboration(.064), and information share (.057) followed.

본 연구에서는 선행 연구를 통해 제시된 공급사슬관리 시스템의 다양한 도입 요인에 대해서 그 중요도를 분석하기 위하여 AHP 기법을 이용하여 연구하였다. 지금까지 연구된 공급사슬관리 시스템의 도입 요인에 대해서 국내외 문헌을 통하여 SCM의 도입 요인을 조직 특성, 거래 특성, 관계 특성, 정보 특성 등 4개의 특성으로 범주화하였으며, 각 특성에 대한 세부 도입 요인으로 조직 특성 요인은 도입 전략, CEO 지원, 정보 기술 성숙도, 평가측정시스템 개발, 혁신 선도자 등 5개 요인, 거래 특성 요인은 거래 기간, 납기/품질, 목표 공유 등 3개 요인, 관계 특성 요인은 신뢰, 협력, 갈등, 상호 의존성, 몰입 등 5개 요인, 정보 특성 요인은 정보의 질, 정보 공유, 정보 교환 등 3개 요인을 설정해서 총 16개의 세부 도입 요인으로 분석하였다. AHP 기법을 이용하여 SCM 도입 요인의 중요도를 분석한 결과 SCM 도입 요인에 관한 1차 계층 요인 중에서는 조직 특성(0.387)의 중요도가 가장 높게 분석되었으며, 관계 특성(0.291), 정보 특성(0.167), 거래 특성(0.155) 순으로 분석되었다. 1차 계층 요인의 중요도와 2차 계층 요인의 중요도를 동시에 고려해서 분석한 결과에서는 가장 중요한 도입 요인이 CEO 지원(.169)이었고, 그 다음으로 신뢰(.124), 도입 전략(.089), 목표 공유(.081), 정보 교환(.069), 협력(.064), 정보 공유(.057) 요인 순으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Thomas, D. J. and P. M. Griffin, "Coordinated Supply Chain Management," European Journal of Operations Research, 94(1), pp. 1-15, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(96)00098-7
  2. Cooper, M. C. and Ellram, L. M., "Characteristics of Supply Chain Management and Its Implication for Purchasing and Logistics Strategy," International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 13-24, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099310804957
  3. Han, D. C., Supply Chain Management, Sigma Insight Com. Co., Ltd. 2002.
  4. La Londe, B. J., "Building a Supply Chain Relationship," Supply Chain Management Review, 2, pp. 7-8, 1998.
  5. Moon, J. B., "Study on the Effects of Supply Chain Integration based on Information System on Business Results" Graduated School of Seoul National University. 2005.
  6. S. R. Choi, "Influential Factors of Information Exchange between SCM Partners" Graduated School of Chung Nam National University. 2002.
  7. Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B. and Daugherty, P. J., "Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance", Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 29-48, 2002.
  8. P. S. Kim, "Study on Precedent factors, Activities and Results of SCM", Graduated School of Kei Myung University. 2004.
  9. Monczka, R., Peterson, K., Handfield, R. and Ragatz, G., "Success Factors in Strategic Supplier Alliances: The Buyng Company Perspective," Decision Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 553-576, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1998.tb01354.x
  10. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D. and Zacharia, Z. G., "Defining Supply Chain Management," Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 1-25, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2001.tb00001.x
  11. Moberg, C. R., "Identifying the antecedents of information exchange among buyers and seller", Doctoral dissertation, Cleveland State Univ., 2000.
  12. Premkumar, G. and Ramamurthy, K., "The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of Interorganizational systems", Decision Science, Vol. 26, No. 3, pp. 303-336, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01431.x
  13. Higginson, J. K. and Alam, A., "Supply chain management techniques in medium-to-small manufacturing firms", International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 19-31, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099710805646
  14. Ross, D. F. Competing Through Supply Chain Management : Creating Winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships, Chapman & Hall, New York, 1998.
  15. Moorman, C., Deshpande, R. and Zaltman, G., "Factor affecting trust in market research relationships", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 81-101, 1993. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252059
  16. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J. B. E. M. and Kumar, N., "Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis", International Journal of research in Marketing, 15(2), pp. 222-248, 1998.
  17. Macbeth, D. and N. Ferguson, Partnership Sourcing: An Integrated Supply Chain Approach, Pitman Publishing, London, 1994.
  18. Daugherty, P. J. Stank, T. P. and D. S. Rogers, "Third-party logistics service providers: Purchasers' perceptions", International Journa of Purchasing and Materials Management, 32(2), pp. 23-29, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1996.tb00222.x
  19. Tang, J. E., Shee, D. and T. Tang, "Conceptual model for interactive buyer-supplier relationship in electronic commerce", International Journal of Information Management, 21, pp .49-68, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00050-5
  20. Evans, P. B. and Wurster, T. S., "Strategy and the new economics of information", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 75, No. 2, pp. 71-82, 1997.
  21. Marien, Edward J., "The Four Supply Chain Enablers," Supply Chain Management Review, 4(1), pp. 60-68, 2000.
  22. Guinipero, L. C. and Brand, R. R., "Purchasing's Role in Supply Chain Management," The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp.29-38, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574099610805412
  23. Davenport, T. H., "Putting the Enterprise into the Enterprise Systems," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 76, No. 4, Jul-Aug., pp. 121-131, 1998.
  24. Tyndal, G., Gopal, C., partsch, W. and J. Kamauff, "Making it happen: the value proceding supply chain", ernst & Young, On-line report, 2000.
  25. Fisher, M. L., Hammond, J. H., Obermeyer, W. R. and A. Raman, "Making supply meet demand in an Uncertain World", Harvard Business Review, May-June, 1994.
  26. Derocher, R. P. and Kilpatrick, J., "Six Supply Chain Lessons for the Millennium," Supply Chain Management Review, Winter, pp. 34-40, 2000.
  27. Park, Y. W., "SCM Assessment and factors for Successful Application", Graduated School of Chung Ang University. 2003.
  28. Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980.