신기술 사용 과정에 관한 비교 사례 연구: 기술 전유 과정의 근거이론적 접근

A Comparative Case Study on the Adaptation Process of Advanced Information Technology: A Grounded Theory Approach for the Appropriation Process

  • 발행 : 2009.09.30

초록

Many firms in Korea have adopted and used advanced information technology in an effort to boost efficiency. The process of adapting to the new technology, at the same time, can vary from one firm to another. As such, this research focuses on several relevant factors, especially the roles of social interaction as a key variable that influences the technology adaptation process and the outcomes. Thus far, how a firm goes through the adaptation process to the new technology has not been yet fully explored. Previous studies on changes undergone by a firm or an organization due to information technology have been pursued from various theoretical points of views, evolved from technological and institutional views to an integrated social technology views. The technology adaptation process has been understood to be something that evolves over time and has been regarded as cycles between misalignments and alignments, gradually approaching the stable aligned state. The adaptation process of the new technology was defined as "appropriation" process according to Poole and DeSanctis (1994). They suggested that this process is not automatically determined by the technology design itself. Rather, people actively select how technology structures should be used; accordingly, adoption practices vary. But concepts of the appropriation process in these studies are not accurate while suggested propositions are not clear enough to apply in practice. Furthermore, these studies do not substantially suggest which factors are changed during the appropriation process and what should be done to bring about effective outcomes. Therefore, research objectives of this study lie in finding causes for the difference in ways in which advanced information technology has been used and adopted among organizations. The study also aims to explore how a firm's interaction with social as well as technological factors affects differently in resulting organizational changes. Detail objectives of this study are as follows. First, this paper primarily focuses on the appropriation process of advanced information technology in the long run, and we look into reasons for the diverse types of the usage. Second, this study is to categorize each phases in the appropriation process and make clear what changes occur and how they are evolved during each phase. Third, this study is to suggest the guidelines to determine which strategies are needed in an individual, group and organizational level. For this, a substantially grounded theory that can be applied to organizational practice has been developed from a longitudinal comparative case study. For these objectives, the technology appropriation process was explored based on Structuration Theory by Giddens (1984), Orlikoski and Robey (1991) and Adaptive Structuration Theory by Poole and DeSanctis (1994), which are examples of social technology views on organizational change by technology. Data have been obtained from interviews, observations of medical treatment task, and questionnaires administered to group members who use the technology. Data coding was executed in three steps following the grounded theory approach. First of all, concepts and categories were developed from interviews and observation data in open coding. Next, in axial coding, we related categories to subcategorize along the lines of their properties and dimensions through the paradigm model. Finally, the grounded theory about the appropriation process was developed through the conditional/consequential matrix in selective coding. In this study eight hypotheses about the adaptation process have been clearly articulated. Also, we found that the appropriation process involves through three phases, namely, "direct appropriation," "cooperate with related structures," and "interpret and make judgments." The higher phases of appropriation move, the more users represent various types of instrumental use and attitude. Moreover, the previous structures like "knowledge and experience," "belief that other members know and accept the use of technology," "horizontal communication," and "embodiment of opinion collection process" are evolved to higher degrees in their dimensions of property. Furthermore, users continuously create new spirits and structures, while removing some of the previous ones at the same time. Thus, from longitudinal view, faithful and unfaithful appropriation methods appear recursively, but gradually faithful appropriation takes over the other. In other words, the concept of spirits and structures has been changed in the adaptation process over time for the purpose of alignment between the task and other structures. These findings call for a revised or extended model of structural adaptation in IS (Information Systems) literature now that the vague adaptation process in previous studies has been clarified through the in-depth qualitative study, identifying each phrase with accuracy. In addition, based on these results some guidelines can be set up to help determine which strategies are needed in an individual, group, and organizational level for the purpose of effective technology appropriation. In practice, managers can focus on the changes of spirits and elevation of the structural dimension to achieve effective technology use.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barley, S.R., "Images of Imaging: Notes on Doing Longuitudinal Field Work," Organizational Science, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1990, pp. 220-247 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.3.220
  2. Barley, S.R., "Technology as an Occasion for structuring: Evidence from Observations of CT Scanners and the Social Order of Radiology Departments," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 31, 1986, pp. 78-108 https://doi.org/10.2307/2392767
  3. Brod, C., "Managing Technostress: Optimizing the Use of Computer Technology," Personnel Journal, Vol. 61, No. 10, 1982, pp. 753-757
  4. Chin, W.W., Gopal, A., and Salisbury, W. D., "Advancing the Theory of Adaptive Structuration: The Development of a Scale to Measure Faithfulness of Appropriation," Information System Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1997, pp. 342-367 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.4.342
  5. Dennis, A.R. and Garfield, M.J., "The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes," MIS Quarterty, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2003, pp. 289-323 https://doi.org/10.2307/30036532
  6. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S., "Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1994, pp. 121-147 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  7. Fulk, J., "Social Construction of Communication Technology," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 5, 1993, pp. 921-950 https://doi.org/10.2307/256641
  8. Giddens, A., "The Constitution of Society," Cambridge: Polity Press, 1984
  9. Giddens, A., "Profiles and Critiques in Social Theory," Berkeley CA: University of California Press, 1982
  10. Gopal, A., Bostrom, R.P., and Chin, W.W., "Applying adaptive structuration theory to investigate the process of group support systems use," Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1993, pp. 45-69
  11. Grover, V., Purvis, R.L., and Segars, A.H., "Exploring Ambidextrous Innovation Tendencies in the Adoption of Telecommunications Technologies," IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 54, No. 2, 2007, pp. 268-285 https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.893995
  12. Guba, E.G., "Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries," Educational Communication and Technology Journal, Vol. 29, 1981, pp. 75-92 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02766777
  13. Leonard-Barton, D., "Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization," Research Policy, Vol. 17, 1988, pp. 251-267 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6
  14. Majchrzak, A., Rice, R.E., Malhotra, A., and King, N., "Technology Adoption: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team," MIS Quarterly Vol. 24, No. 4, 2000, pp. 569-600 https://doi.org/10.2307/3250948
  15. Markus, L., "Power, Politics and MIS Implementation," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 6, 1983, pp. 430-444 https://doi.org/10.1145/358141.358148
  16. Orlikowski, W.J., "The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations," Organizational Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1992, pp. 398-427 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
  17. Orlikowski, W.J. and Robey, D., "Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations," Information Systems Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1991, pp. 143-169 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.2.143
  18. Poole, M.S. and DeSanctis, G., "Microlevel Structuration in Computer-Supported Group Decision Making," Human Communication Research, Vol. 19, No. 1, 1992, pp. 5-49 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00294.x
  19. Powell, W.W. and DiMaggio, P.J., "The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis," University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991
  20. Salisbury, W.D., Chin, W.W., Gopal A., and Newsted, P.R., "Research report: Better theory through measurement-developing a scale to capture consensus on appropriation," Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2002, pp. 91-103 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.91.93
  21. Sambamurthy, V. and Chin, W.W., "The Effect of Group Attitudes Toward GDSS Designs on the Decision-Making Performance of Computer-Supported Groups," Decision Science, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1994, pp. 215-241 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb01840.x
  22. Sambamurthy, V. and Desanctis, G., "An experimental evaluation of GDSS effects on group performance during stakeholder analysis," System Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1990, pp. 79-88
  23. Schwieger, D., Melcher, A., Ranganathan, D., and Wen, H.J., "Appropriating electronic billing systems: Adaptive structuration theory analysis," Human Systems Management, Vol. 23, 2004, pp. 235-243
  24. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J., "Basics of qualitative Research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed," London : Sage, Publications. 1998
  25. Tyre, M.J. and Orlikowski, W.J., "Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation In Organizations," Organization Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, 1994, pp. 98-118 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.98