DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Price Sensitivity based on the Shopping Value, Purpose of Use and Social Situation

소비자의 쇼핑가치와 사용목적 및 사회적 상황에 따른 가격민감도 비교

  • Nam, Eun-Ha (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Hwa (Dept. of Clothing & Textiles, Pusan National University)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

This research investigates the factors influencing price sensitivity in fashion products. This study incorporates three essential variables, which were likely to influence price sensitivity: the subjective shopping value of consumers, objective purpose of use, and social situation according to the shopping companions of consumers. A sample of young adult consumers (who had purchase experience of fashion products during the last six-months) was surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. A 3-way ANOVA was used to evaluate the data. The results show that the utilitarian shopping value of consumers was more sensitive in price than the hedonic shopping value and a self-using purchase was more sensitive in price than a gift-giving purchase. In addition, a correlation effect was significant between the purpose of use and social situation. In addition, the correlation effect among all of the three variables was also significant.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽영식, 이진화. (2002). 청바지제품 세분시장 내 가격-품질 평가집단 추출에 관한 연구-결합분석과 mixture model 를 이용하여. 한국의류학회지, 26(11), 1605−1614
  2. 김시월, 박배진. (2003). 인터넷 쇼핑몰에서 가격민감도와 구매 후 만족도에 관한 연구. 대한가정학회지, 41(9), 69−82
  3. 김지영. (2001). 쇼핑가치, 소비자 관여, 소비감정에 따른 의류 제품 구매 후 만족에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 대학원 박사 학위 논문
  4. 박은주, 강은미. (2002). 생활한복의 사용목적이 구매행동에 미치는 영향. 소비문화연구, 5(1), 47−64
  5. 박현숙, 곽원섭. (2003). 소비자의 가격,품질지각에 관한 연구. 한국심리학회지, 4(2), 1−21
  6. 백수경, 황선진. (2002). 한국과 미국 패션제품의 가격과 객관적 품질에 관한 비교연구-1990년대를 중심으로-. 한국의류학회지, 26(3/4), 527−538
  7. 신상무, 조정민. (2002). 가격할인이 인터넷 쇼핑몰에서의 의류 구매의도 및 태도에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 26(8), 1239−1247
  8. 여운승. (2007). 최신 마케팅 관리론. 서울: 한양대학교 출판부
  9. 오수민, 황선진. (2007). 소비자의 상표충성도, 경쟁상표의 가격, 그리고 가격할인이 의류제품의 상표전환에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 31(3), 440−450 https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.3.440
  10. 이윤경, 황선진. (2000). 소비자의 물질주의 특성과 제품의 가격, 구매시점 광고가 구매행동에 미치는 영향-진의류 할인판매를 중심으로-. 한국의류학회지, 24(6), 884−894
  11. 이희승, 임숙자. (2000). 가격과 상표가 의복의 지각된 품질, 가치, 구매의도에 미치는 영향. 한국의류학회지, 24(4), 498−509
  12. 임경복. (2000). 의복 구매상황에 따른 위험지각과 정보원 활용에 대한 연구: 자기사용목적과 선물구매 상황을 중심으로. 복식문화연구, 8(3), 450−459
  13. 전영미, 정명선. (2002). 의류제품 가격할인광고 시 할인유형의 어의적 단서가 소비자의 지각과 구매의도에 미치는 조절효과. 한국의류학회지, 26(9), 1342−1353
  14. 진혜숙. (2002). 쇼핑가치유형과 상황에 따른 의류점포 서비스 품질에 관한 연구. 한양대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문
  15. 최미영, 이은영. (1998). 의류제품의 품질평가에 있어서 가격단서의 영향. 한국의류학회지, 22(8), 1099−1110
  16. 최정, 이은영. (2001). 가격할인빈도가 소비자의 의류상표자산 평가에 미치는 영향에 대한 연구. 한국의류학회지, 25(6), 1025−1036
  17. Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 113−124
  18. Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivations. Journal of Retailing, 79, 77−95 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00007-1
  19. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 644−656 https://doi.org/10.1086/209376
  20. Bearden, W. O., & Rose, R. L. (1990). Attention to social comparison information: An individual difference factor affecting consumer conformity. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 461−471 https://doi.org/10.1086/209231
  21. Belk, R. W. (1974). An exploratory assessment of situational effects in buyer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 11, 156−163 https://doi.org/10.2307/3150553
  22. Belk, R. W. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 157−164
  23. Carpenter, J. M. (2007). Consumer shopping value, satisfaction and loyalty in discount retailing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 1−6
  24. Carpenter, J. M., Moore, M., & Fairhurst, A. E. (2005). Consumer shopping value for retail brands. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 9(1), 43−53 https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020510586398
  25. Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. A. (2000). Benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65−81 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.4.65.18071
  26. Choi, D. H., Kim, C. M., Kim, S. I., & Kim, S. H. (2006). Customer loyalty and disloyalty in Internet retail stores: Its antecedents and its effect on customer price sensitivity. International Journal of Management, 23(4), 925−941
  27. Dhar, R., & Wertenbroch, K. (2000). Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(1), 60−71 https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718
  28. Fischer, E., & Arnold, S. J. (1990). More than a labor of love: Gender roles and christmas gift shopping. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(3), 333−345 https://doi.org/10.1086/208561
  29. Foxall, G. R., & James, V. K. (2003). The behavioral ecology of brand choice: How and what do consumers maximize? Psychology & Marketing, 20(9), 811−836 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10098
  30. Goldsmith, R. E., & Clark, R. A. (2006). Interpersonal influence and consumer innovativeness. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(1), 34−43 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00435.x
  31. Goldsmith, R. E., Kim, D. W., Flynn, L. R., & Kim, W. M. (2005). Price sensitivity and innovativeness for fashion among Korean consumers. The Journal of Social Psychology, 145(5), 501−508 https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.5.501-508
  32. Goldsmith, R. E., & Newell, S. J. (1997). Innovativeness and price sensitivity: Managerial, theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 6(3), 163−174 https://doi.org/10.1108/10610429710175682
  33. Hsien, A. T., & Chang, W. T. (2004). The effect of consumer participation on price sensitivity. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(2), 282−296 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6606.2004.tb00869.x
  34. Jones, M. A., Reynolds, K. E., & Arnold, M. J. (2006). Hedonic and utilitarian shopping value: Investigating differential effects on retail outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 59, 974−981 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.006
  35. Kalar, A., & Goodstein, R. C. (1998). The impact of advertising positioning strategies on consumer price sensitivity. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 210−224
  36. Lee, M. Y., Kim, Y. K., & Fairhurst, A. (2009). Shopping value in online auctions: Their antecedent and outcomes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 16, 75−82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.11.003
  37. Lichtenstein, D. R., Bloch, P. H., & Black, W. C. (1988). Correlates of price acceptability. Journal of Consumer Research, 15, 243−252 https://doi.org/10.1086/209161
  38. Orth, U. R. (2005). Consumer personality and other factors in situational brand choice variation. Brand Management, 3(2), 115−133
  39. Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59, 1160−1166 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.03.008
  40. Quester, P. G., & Smart, J. (1998). The influence of consumption situation and product involvement over consumers' use of product attribute. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(3), 220−238 https://doi.org/10.1108/07363769810219107
  41. Schmitt, B. H., & Shultz, C. J. (1995). Situational effects on brand preferences for image products. Psychology and Marketing, 12(5), 433−446 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220120507
  42. Sherry, J. F., Jr. (1990). A sociocultural analysis of a midwestern American flea market. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(1), 13−30 https://doi.org/10.1086/208533
  43. Suri, R., & Monroe, K. B. (2001). The effects of need for cognition and trait anxiety on price acceptability. Psychology & Marketing, 18(1), 21−42 https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6793(200101)18:1<21::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-T
  44. Wakefield, K. L., & Inman, J. J. (2003). Situational price sensitivity: The role of consumption occasion, social context and income. Journal of Retailing, 79, 199−212 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2003.09.004
  45. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perception of price, quality and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52, 222−236
  46. Zhuang, G., Tsang, A. S. L., Zhou, N., Li, F., & Nicholls, J. A. F. (2006). Impacts of situational factors on buying decisions in shopping malls: An empirical study with multinational data. European Journal of Marketing, 40(1/2), 17−43 https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560610637293

Cited by

  1. The Influence of Innovativeness and Price Sensitivity on Purchase Intention of Smart Wear vol.36, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2012.36.2.218
  2. Study on the Preferred Store Type and Store Choice Properties of Clothing Shopping Consumers Based on the AHP Method vol.36, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2012.36.2.138
  3. Effects of Price Attitude toward Apparel Products on Shopping Values and Consumption Behavior vol.16, pp.6, 2012, https://doi.org/10.12940/jfb.2012.16.6.109
  4. Antecedents of dressing style vol.21, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7741/rjcc.2013.21.5.639
  5. Difference Age and Price Attitude toward Apparel Products according to College Students' Vanity Typology vol.17, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5805/SFTI.2015.17.2.203
  6. The Effect of Shopping Value on Fashion Shopping Satisfaction and Future Behavioral Intention in Fashion Social Commerce vol.38, pp.3, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2014.38.3.293
  7. Price Sensitivity, Repurchasing and Switching Intention of Internet Fashion Consumers vol.39, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2015.39.1.106
  8. A Study on Factors that Affect the Selection of Multichannel in the Apparel Retail -Based on the Characteristics of Marketing and Customer- vol.35, pp.7, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5850/JKSCT.2011.35.7.801
  9. Effects of perceived risk, community usage motive and price sensitivity of overseas direct purchase consumers on customer satisfaction vol.26, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2018.26.6.951