DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

WinBioDBs: A Windows-based Integrated Program for Manipulating Major Biological Databases

  • Nam, Hye-Weon (Information Technology Institute, SmallSoft Co. Ltd.) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Ho (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Kyungsung University) ;
  • Park, Kie-Jung (Information Technology Institute, SmallSoft Co. Ltd.)
  • Published : 2009.09.30

Abstract

We have developed WinBioDBs with Windows interfaces, which include importing modules and searching interfaces for 10 major public databases such as GenBank, PIR, SwissProt, Pathway, EPD, ENZYME, REBASE, Prosite, Blocks, and Pfam. User databases can be constructed with searching results of queries and their entries can be edited. The program is a stand-alone database searching program on Windows PC. Database update features are supported by importing raw database files and indexing after downloading them. Users can adjust their own searching environments and report format and construct their own projects consisting of a combination of a local databases. WinBioDBs are implemented with VC++ and its database is based on MySQL.

Keywords

References

  1. Barker, W.C., Garavelli, J.S., Huang, H., McGarvey, P.B., Orcutt, B.C., Srinivasarao, G.Y., Xiao, C., Yeh, L.S., Ledley, R.S., Janda, J.F., Pfeiffer, F., Mewes, H.W., Tsugita, A., and Wu, C. (2000), The protein information resource (PIR), Nucl. Acids Res . 28, 41-44 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.41
  2. Bairoch, A., Boeckmann, B., Ferro, S., and Gasteiger, E. (2004). Swiss-Prot: Juggling between evolution and stability. Brief. Bioinform . 5, 39-55 https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/5.1.39
  3. Bateman, A., Coin, L., Durbin, R., Finn, R.D., Hollich, V., Griffiths-Jones, S., Khanna, A., Marshall, M., Moxon, S., Sonnhammer, E.L., Studholme, D.J., Yeats, C., and Eddy, S.R. (2004). The Pfam Protein Families Database. Nucl. Acids Res . 32, D138-D141 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh121
  4. Benson, D.A., Karsch-Mizrachi, I., Lipman, D.J., Ostell, J., and Wheeler, D.L. (2004). GenBank: update. Nucl. Acids Res . 32, 23-26
  5. Bairoch, A. (2000). The ENZYME database in 2000. Nucl. Acids Res . 28, 304-305 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.304
  6. Hulo, N., Sigrist, C.J., Le Saux, V., Langendijk-Genevaux, P.S., Bordoli, L., Gattiker, A., De Castro, E., Bucher, P., and Bairoch, A. (2004). Recent improvements to the PROSITE database. Nucl. Acids Res . 32, D134-D137 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh044
  7. Henikoff, J.G., Greene, E.A., Pietrokovski, S., and Henikoff, S. (2000). Increased coverage of protein families with the blocks database servers. Nucl. Acids Res . 28, 228-230 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.228
  8. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S., Kawashima, S., and Nakaya, A. (2002). The KEGG databases at GenomeNet. Nucl. Acids Res . 30, 42-46 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/30.1.42
  9. Roberts, R.J., Vincze, T., Posfai, J., and Macelis, D. (2007). REBASE-enzymes and genes for DNA restriction and modification. Nucl. Acids Res . 35, D269-D270 https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkl891
  10. Schmid, C.D., Perier, R., Praz, V., and Bucher, P. (2006). EPD in its twentieth year: towards complete promoter coverage of selected model organisms. Nucl. Acids Res . 34, D82-D85. http://www.mysql.com https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkj146