대한방사선기술학회지:방사선기술과학 (Journal of radiological science and technology)

  • 제32권3호
  • /
  • Pages.325-334
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 2288-3509(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-1168(eISSN)
대한방사선과학회 (Korean Society of Radiological Science)
권호 표지

뇌종양의 등급분류를 위한 관류 자기공명영상을 이용한 투과성영상(Permeability Map)의 유용성 평가

Usefulness of Permeability Map by Perfusion MRI of Brain Tumor the Grade Assessment

  • 배성진 (계명대학교 동산의료원 영상의학과) ;
  • 이영주 ;
  • 장혁원 (계명대학교 의과대학 영상의학교실)
  • 발행 : 2009.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목 적 : 관류 자기공명영상(perfusion MRI)을 이용하여 대뇌(cerebral)에서 혈액뇌장벽의 파괴로 인하여 조영제가 혈관내에서 조직으로 빠져 나가는 투과성과 상대적 뇌혈류량을 영상화 해보고, 이 영상을 이용하여 구한 투과성비와 상대적 뇌혈류량비가 종양의 악성등급 평가와 감별진단에 어떠한 유용성이 있는지 알아보고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법 : 영상의학진단과 병리조직검사로 진단된 29명을 대상으로 뇌종양이 포함된 550(11 silce $\times$ 50 image)관류 자기공명영상을 3T기기에 장착된 프로그램으로 상대적 뇌혈류량을 영상화 하였고, 다른 한 방법은 개인 컴퓨터에 영상을 전송 후 IDL 6.2 프로그램을 이용하여 상대적 뇌혈류량(relative cerebral blood volume-reformulated singular value decomposition, rCBV-rSVD)과 투과성을 영상화 하였다. 그 영상을 이용하여 동일한 관심영역으로 화소별 평균 신호강도를 정량적(quantitative analysis)으로 측정하여 비모수적 통계인 Kruskal-wallis test를 통해 뇌종양별로 평균비교 분석을 하였다. 결과 : 상대적 뇌혈류량영상과 투과성영상을 이용하여 동일한 관심영역으로 정상부위와 종양부위의 정량적으로 분석한 상대적 뇌혈류량 비 와 (3T 기기자체 분석한 값, IDL 6.2로 분석한 값) 투과성비에서 고등급 성상세포종(n=4)의 경우 (14.75, 19.25) 13.13, 저등급 성상세포종(n=5) (14.80, 15.90) 11.60, 아세포종(n=5) (10.90, 18.60) 22.00, 전이성 뇌종양(n=6) (11.00, 15.08) 22.33, 수막종(n=6) (18.58, 7.67) 5.58, 핍돌기 신경교종(n=3) (23.33, 16.33) 15.67로 나타났다. 결론 : 종양별로 상대적 혈류량영상을 이용하여 측정한 상대적 뇌혈류량 비는 등급을 분류하기에 용이하지 않았지만, 투과성영상으로 측정한 투과성비는 종양 악성정도가 높을수록 높은 것으로 나타나 종양의 등급 평가와 감별진단에 유용하였다.

Purpose : This study was conducted to assess how effective the permeability ratio and relative cerebral blood volume ratio are to tumor through perfusion MRI by measuring and reflecting the grade assessment and differential diagnosis and the permeability and relative cerebral blood volume of contrast media plunged from blood vessel into organ due to breakdown of blood-brain barrier in cerebral. Subject and Method : Subject of study was 29 patients whose diagnosis were confirmed by biopsy after surgery and 550 (11 slice$\times$50 image) perfusion MRI were used to make image of relative cerebral blood volume with the program furnished on instrument. The other method was to transmit to private computer and the image analysis was made additionally by making image of relative cerebral blood volume-reformulated singular value decomposition, rCBV-rSVD and permeability using IDL.6.2. In addition, Kruskal-wallis test tonggyein non numerical average by a comparative analysis of brain tumors Results : The rCBV ratio (Functool PF; GE Medical Systems and IDL 6.2 program by analysis) and permeability ratio of tumors were as follows; high grade glioma(n=4), (14.75, 19.25) 13.13. low grade astrocytoma(n=5) (14.80, 15.90) 11.60, glioblastoma(n=5) (10.90, 18.60), 22.00, metastasis(n=6) (11.00, 15.08). 22.33. meningioma(n=6) (18.58, 7.67), 5.58. oliogodendroglioma(n=3) (23.33, 16.33, 15.67. Conclusion : It was not easy to classify the grade with the relative cerebral blood volume ratio measured by using the relative cerebral blood image by type of tumors, however, permeability ratio measured by permeability image revealed that the higher the grade of tumor, the higher the measured permeability ratio, showing the assessment of tumor grade is more effective to differential diagnosis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Wong JC, Provenzale JM, Petrella JR :Perfusion MR imaging of brain neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 174, 1147-1157, 2000 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741147
  2. Poptani H, Gupta RK, Roy R, Pandey R, JainVK, Chhabra DK : Characterization of intracranialmass lesions with in vivo proton MRspectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 16, 1593-1603, 1995
  3. Burnetti A, Alfano B, Soricelli A, et al :Functional characterization of brain tumors; anoverview of the potential clinical value. Nucl Med Biol, 23, 699-715, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/0969-8051(96)00069-8
  4. Petrella JR, Provenzale JM : MR perfusionimaging of the brain ; techniques andapplications. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 175, 207-219, 2000 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.1.1750207
  5. Wong JC, Provenzale JM, Petrella JR :Perfusion MR imaging of brain neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 174, 1147-1157, 2000 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741147
  6. Poptani H, Gupta RK, Roy R, Pandey R, JainVK, Chhabra DK : Characterization of intracranialmass lesions with in vivo proton MRspectroscopy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 16, 1593-1603, 1995
  7. Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Wells JW, Woolfolk CE :Assessment of cerebral perfusion by first-pass,dynamic, contrast-enhanced, steady-state freeprecessionalMR imaging ; an animal study.AJR Am J Roentgenol, 160, 593-600, 1993 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.160.3.8430562
  8. 제환준, 장기현, 송인찬 등 : 급성 뇌경색 환자에서 관류MR 영상; T2강조영상과 확산강조영상과의 비교. 대한방사선의학회지, 43, 1-8, 2000
  9. Felix R, Schorner W, Laniado M, et al : Braintumors; MR imaging with gadolinium-DTPA.Radiology, 156, 681-688, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.156.3.4040643
  10. Lev M, Rosen B : Clinical applications of intracranialperfusion MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 9, 309-31, 1999
  11. 조영민, 고은혜, 정광우 등 : 뇌종양환자에서 관류자기공명 영상의 유용성. 대한방사선 의학회지, 43, 265-271, 2000
  12. Lee SJ, Kim JH, Kim YM, et al. Perfusion MRimaging in gliomas: comparison with histologictumor grade. Korean J Radiol, 2(1), 1-7, 2001 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2001.2.1.1
  13. Cho KS, Na GD, Ryoo WJ, et al. Perfusion MRimaging: clinical utility for the differential diagnosisof various brain tumors. Korean J Radiol, 3, 171-79, 2002 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2002.3.3.171
  14. Bahattin H, Cuneyt E, Naile B,Nalan Y,Gokhan G and Mufit P.Evaluation of DifferentCerebral Mass Lesions by Perfusion-WeightedMR Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 24,817-824, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20707
  15. Cha S, Knopp EA, Johnson G, Wetzel SG, LittAW, Zagzag D. Intracranial mass lesions: dynamiccontrast-enhanced susceptibility-weightedecho-planar perfusion MR imaging. Radiology,223, 11-9, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2231010594
  16. Ka-Loh Li, Xiao Ping Zhu, John Waterton, AlanJackson. Improved 3D quantitative mapping ofblood volume and endothelial permeability inbrain tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging, 12, 347-357, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2586(200008)12:2<347::AID-JMRI19>3.0.CO;2-7
  17. Bahattin Hakyemez, Cuneyt Erdogan, Naile Bolca,et al. Evaluation of Different Cerebral MassLesions by Perfusion-Weighted MR Imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging, 24, 817-824, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20707