International Journal of Industrial Entomology and Biomaterials

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.187-192
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 3022-7542(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-4785(eISSN)
한국잠사학회 (Korean Society of Sericultural Science)
권호 표지

Silk Filament Progression with Backcross Breeding Generations in Tropical Tasar Silkworm, Antheraea mylitta D

  • 발행 : 2009.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Silk filament progression study applying backcross breeding with recipient parent Jata and donor parent Daba ecoraces of tropical tasar silkworm, Antheraea mylitta Drury conducted during 2006 to 2008, revealed introgression of filament denier (10.2 d) superior to both parents at BC4 level. Also, the silk waste (0.35%) and filament breaks (2.6 nos) were reduced compared to both parents, while the filament length (973 m) and non break filament (296 m) improved over donor and could attain closer to recipient parent. The best performance of Jata $\times$ Daba at F1 level, with highest silk filament length (1646 m) of 12.5 d denier, denotes heterosis impact on silk trait with parental heterogenousity, an advantage to exploit silk filament yield. The progression of quality in terms of finer filament denier, less silk waste and least number of filament breaks over both parents and improvement in filament length and non break filament over donor parent except for a marginal shortage against recipient at BC4 level indicates the prospects of Jata and Daba ecoraces as source of breeding material for qualitative improvement of tasar silk filament. The study suggests that the commercially important finer denier of tasar silk filament can be attained with minor reduction in silk yield of wild Jata ecorace by adopting repeated backcrossing for four generations with semi domesticated Daba ecorace.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Babu R, Nair SK, Kumar A, Venkatesh S, Sekhar JC, Singh NN, Srinivasan G, Gupta HS (2005) Two generations marker aided back crossing for rapid conversion of normal maize lines to quality protein maize (QPM) Theor Appl Genet 111, 888-897 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-005-0011-6
  2. Chatterjee SN, Mohandas TP (2003) Identification of ISSR markers associated with productivity traits in silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Genome 46, 438-447 https://doi.org/10.1139/g03-024
  3. Hansda G, Reddy RM, Sinha MK, Ojha NG, Vijaya Prakash NB (2008) Ex-situ stabilization and utility prospects of 'Jata' ecorace of tropical tasar silkworm Antheraea mylitta Drury. Int J Indust Entomol 17, 169-172
  4. Hospital F (2005) Selection in backcross programmes. Phil Trans R Soc B 360, 1503-1511 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1670
  5. Kumar NS, Basavaraja HK, Kalpana GV, Mal Reddy N, Jayaswal KP, Thippeswamy T, Datta RK (2002) Cocoon filament size déviation in bivoltine silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Ind J Seric 41, 42-48
  6. Malik FA, Reddy YS (2007) Role of mulberry nutrition on manifestation of post cocoon characters of selected races of the silkworm Bombyx mori L. Sericologia 47, 63-76
  7. Mulder HA, Bijma P (2005) Effects of genotype x environment interaction on genetic gain in breeding programs. J Anim Sci 83, 49-61 https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.83149x
  8. Moghaddam SHH, Emam JN, Mirhosseini SZ, Gholamy MR (2005) Genetic improvement of some traits in four strains of silkworm, Bombyx mori L. Int J Indust Entomol 10, 95-99
  9. Moorthy SM, Das SK, Kar NB, Raje Urs S (2007) Breeding of Bivoltine breeds of Bombyx mori L suitable for variable climatic conditions of tropics. Int J Indust Entomol 14, 99-105
  10. Nagaraju J (2002) Application of genetic principles for improving silk production. Current Science 83(4), 409-414
  11. Nakada T (1992) Sequence of some cocoon traits in the progeny tests after crossing between wild and domesticated silkworms. Wild Silkmoths 91, 98-104
  12. Ooijen VWJ (1992) Accuracy of mapping quantitative trait loci in Autogamous sp. Theor Appl Genet 84, 803-811
  13. Petkov N, Petkov Z, Greiss H (2003) Manifestation of heterosis and inheritance of productive characters in simple and complex silkworm Bombyx mori L. hybrid combinations III. Filament length and filament weight. Bulg J Agric Sci 9, 527-532
  14. Raju PJ, Krishnamurthy NB (1993) Breeding of two bivoltines, MG511 and MG512 of Bombyx mori L. for higher viability and productivity. Sericologia 33, 577-587
  15. Reddy RM, Suryanarayana N, Ojha NG, Hansda G, Rai S, Vijaya Prakash NB (2009) Basic seed stock maintenance and multiplication in Indian tropical tasar silkworm Antheraea mylitta Drury - A strategic approach. Int J Indust Entomol 18, 69-75
  16. Sekharappa BM, Radhakrishna PG, Keshavareddy KS, Dandin SB (1999) Breeding of bivoltine silkworm races with better survival and high shell content for tropics-Karnataka. Sericologia 39, 205-210
  17. Semaga K, Bjornstad A, Ndjiondjop MN (2006) Progress and prospects of marker assisted backcrossing as a tool in crop breeding programme. Afr J Biotech 5, 2588-2603
  18. Siddiqui AA, Sengupta AK (1994) Genetic variability in technological characters-first report in Antheraea mylitta D. Sericologia 34, 149-154
  19. Srivastava AK, Naqvi AH, Sinha AK, Vishwakarma SR, Roy GC (2004) Genotype and environment interaction in Antheraea mylitta Drury and its implications. Persp Cytol Genet 11, 219-224
  20. Takabayashi C, Hariraj G, Tsuboi H, Tsughe M (1994) Comparative studies between exploitation reeling tension and reeling performance of Indian pure and hybrid races. Sericologia 34, 287-295
  21. Tazima Y (1984) Silkworm moths: In evolution of domesticated animals, I.L.Mason (ed.), Longman, London and New York, 416-424
  22. Tzenov PI, Guzman ZID (2004) Breeding the new Bulgarian sex-limited for larval markings silkworm Bombyx mori L. commercial hybrid ZE/4 and study on its performance in the Philippines and Bulgaria. Sericologia 44, 297-312
  23. Verma AK, Chattopadhyay GK, Sengupta M, Sengupta AK, Das SK, Raje Urs S (2003) Expression of heterotic genetic interaction among MV recurrent backcross / congenic lines for higher shell weight of silkworm Bombyx mori L. Int J Indust Entomol 7, 21-27
  24. Zamir D (2001) Improving plant breeding with exotic genetic libraries. Nature Rev (Genetics) 2, 983-989 https://doi.org/10.1038/35103589