DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of biological treatment of cutting-oil wastes using sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process

연속 회분식 반응조 (SBR) 공정을 이용한 폐절삭유의 생물학적 처리능 평가

  • Baek, Byung-Do (Department of Semiconductor and Display engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Seop (Department of Environment engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Kim, Jun-Young (Department of Semiconductor and Display engineering, Hoseo University) ;
  • Chang, In-Soung (Department of Environment engineering, Hoseo University)
  • 백병도 (호서대학교 반도체.디스플레이공학과) ;
  • 김창섭 (호서대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 김준영 (호서대학교 반도체.디스플레이공학과) ;
  • 장인성 (호서대학교 환경공학과)
  • Published : 2009.07.31

Abstract

Two different cutting-oils from H and B companies which are sold as an eco-friendly cutting-oils were selected and the biodegradability of these commercially available cutting-oils was evaluated by the sequencing batch reactor (SBR) processes. The cutting-oil wastes ($H_1$) pre-treated by coagulation/flocculation was used as an influent to SBR. When the F/M ratio was operated 0.04 to 0.08kgCOD/kgMLSS d, removals of $BOD_5$and $COD_{Cr}$were above 97% and 91%, respectively. T-N and T-P removals were above 76% and 81%, respectively. If the diluted cutting-oil wastes ($B_1$) was used as an influent of the SBR, $COD_{Cr}$removals were above 77% at the F/M ratio of 0.01-0.02kgCOD/kgMLSS d. After the cutting-oil wastes was treated by coagulation/ flocculation ($B_2$), $COD_{Cr}$removals was above 85%. If the pre-treated cutting-oil wastes were mixed with a synthetic wastewater ($B_3$) and fed into the SBR in order to mimic the real wastewater treatment plant situation, $BOD_5$and $COD_{Cr}$removals were above 97%, 91%, respectively. T-N and T-P removals were above 79% and 76%. The ratio between $BOD_5$and $COD_{Cr}$, ($COD_{Cr}$-$BOD_5$)/$COD_{Cr}$, indicating the biodegradability of effluent of the SBR, was calculated to 85% and 61%. This means that significant amounts of non-readily-biodegradable organic compounds in the effluent of $H_1$, $B_3$are still present.

본 연구에서는 연속회분식반응조 (Sequencing Batch Reactor, SBR)를 이용하여 친환경성 절삭유라는 이름으로 시판되는 절삭유 2종 (H사, B사)의 생물학적 처리능을 평가하였다. H사의 절삭유를 응집/응결 전처리 ($H_1$)하여 0.04-0.08kgCOD/kgMLSS d의 F/M비로 SBR로 유입한 경우, $BOD_5$$COD_{Cr}$의 평균 제거율은 각각 97%, 91%이상을 나타내었으며, T-N, T-P의 평균 제거율은 각각 76%, 81%이상을 나타내었다. B사의 절삭유를 희석한 후 ($B_1$) 0.01-0.02kgCOD/kgMLSS d의 F/M비에 맞추어 SBR로 유입한 경우, $COD_{Cr}$의 평균 제거율은 77% 이상을 나타내었다. 응집/응결 처리된 절삭유 (B2)를 0.01-0.04kgCOD/kgMLSS d의 F/M비에 맞추어 유입한 경우, $COD_{Cr}$의 평균 제거율은 85%이상을 나타내었다. 이후 실제 처리장에서 폐절삭유를 처리할 때 오수와 합병하여 처리하는 상황을 반영하기 위하여 $B_2$와 합성폐수를 혼합하여 ($B_3$) 0.09-0.11kgCOD/kgMLSS d의 F/M비에 맞추어 유입하였을 때, $BOD_5$$COD_{Cr}$의 평균 제거율은 각각 97%, 98%이상을 나타내었고 T-N, T-P의 평균 제거율은 각각 79%, 76%이상을 나타내었다. 그리고 생물학적 처리를 거친 $H_1$$B_3$에 대한 각각의 유출수의 ($COD_{Cr}$-$BOD_5$)/$COD_{Cr}$비는 각각 85%와 61%정도로 난분해성 유기물이 잔존하고 있는 것을 확인할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김영운, 홍광민, 정근우, 반찬조, "미생물을 이용한 절삭유제의 부패성능 평가에 관한 연구". 한국화학공학회지, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 350-355, November, 2006.
  2. 박동욱, 윤충식, 이송권, "절삭유(Metalworking Fluids) 의 발암성에 대한 고찰", 한국정밀공학회지, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 50-62, January, 2003.
  3. 임병란, 배시애, 임호주, 조창호, "생물활성탄을 이용한 절삭유로 오염된 지하수의 처리특성과 미생물군집 구조 해석", 한국환경보건학회지, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 71-76, February, 2006.
  4. M. Kobya, C. Ciftci, M. Bayramoglu, M.T. Sensoy, "Study on the treatment of waste metal cutting fluids using electrocoagulation", Separation and Purification Technology, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 285-291, May, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2007.09.003
  5. U. Daiminger, W. Nitsch, P. Plucinski, S. Hoffmann, "Novel techniques for oil/water separation", Journal of Membrane Science, Vol. 99, No .2, pp. 197-203, February, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-7388(94)00218-N
  6. Sheng H. Lim, Wen J. Lan, "Treatment of waste oil/water emulsion by ultrafiltration and ion exchange", Water Research, Vol. 32, No. 9, pp. 2680-2688, Se- ptember, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00035-9
  7. In-Soung Chang, Chang-Mo Chung, Seung-Ho Han, "Treatment of oily wastewater by ultrafiltration and ozone", Desalination, Vol. 133, No. 3, pp. 225-232, April , 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(01)00103-5
  8. Juan R. Portela, J. Lopez, E. Nebot, E. Martínez de la Ossa, "Elimination of cutting oil wastes by promoted hydrothermal oxidation", Journal of Hazar-dous Materials, Vol. 88, No. 1, pp. 95-106, November, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3894(01)00295-3
  9. G. Libralato, A. Volpi Ghirardini, F. Avezzὺ, "Evaporation and air-stripping to assess and reduce ethanolamines toxicity in oily wastewater", Journal of Hazardous Materials, Vol. 153, No. 3, pp. 928-936, May, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.042
  10. Metcalf & Eddy, "Wastewater Engineering- Treatment and Reuse", 4th edition, McGraw-Hill H. E., 2003.
  11. Daniel J. Arp, Chris M. Teager, Michael R. Hyman, "Molecular and cellular fundamentals of aerobic cometabolism of trichloroethylene", Biodegradation, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 81-103, March, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012089908518