DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes in Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in Response to Natural Disturbances in a Stream

  • Bae, Mi-Jung (Department of Biology and Institute of Global Environment, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Young-Seuk (Department of Biology and Institute of Global Environment, Kyung Hee University)
  • Published : 2009.08.31

Abstract

Benthic macroinvertebrate communities were collected from six different sites in the Dobong Stream in Seoul, Korea to investigate spatial and temporal changes in benthic macroinvertebrate communities in response to natural disturbances such as floods and droughts. We collected samples monthly or semimonthly with a Surber net ($30cm{\times}30cm$), and measured environmental factors, including stream temperature, discharge, width, conductivity, dissolved oxygen and pH at each sampling site. Benthic macro invertebrates were strongly affected by floods as well as droughts. In addition, benthic macroinvertebrate communities displayed different responses to the onset of the rainy season in summer 2006 and 2007, apparently due to differences in the intensity and amount of precipitation. Chironomids were particularly sensitive to heavy rain. Floods and droughts also affected the proportions of functional feeding groups during the survey period: the proportion of scrapers was high right after heavy rains, while the proportion of predators tended to increase in intermittent-type streams as the riffle zone decreased. Finally, although species richness and abundance were strongly influenced by heavy rain, they recovered to background levels for within one month, and varied consistently among stream types, indicating habitat stability.

Keywords

References

  1. APHA, AWWA, WPCF, 1985. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Waste, 16th ed. Washington D.C
  2. Bae MJ, Kwon YS, Hwang SJ, Park YS. 2008. Comparison of four different ordination methods for patterning water quality of agricultural reservoirs. Korean J Limnol 41 (Special issue): 1-10
  3. Bae MJ, Park YS. 2008. Characterizing ecological exergy as an ecosystem indicator in streams using a self-organizing map. Korean J Env Bioi 26: 202-213
  4. Batzer DP; Palik BJ, Buech R. 2004. Relationships between environmental characteristics and macroinvertebrate communities in seasonaı woodland ponds of Minnesota. J N Am Benthol Soc 23:50-68 https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2004)023<0050:RBECAM>2.0.CO;2
  5. Borg I, Groenen P. 1997. Modem Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and applications. Springer, New York
  6. Brasher AMD. 2003. Impacts of human disturbances on biotic communities in Hawaiian streams. Bioscience 53: 1052-1060 https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[1052:IOHDOB]2.0.CO;2
  7. Brigham AR, Brigham WU, Gnilka A. 1982. Aquatic Insects and Oligochaetes of North and South Carolina. Midwest Aquatic Enterprise, Mahomet, Ill
  8. Brinkhurst RO, Jamieson BGM. 1971. Aquatic Oligochaeta of the World. Oliver and Body, Edinburgh
  9. Brinkhurst RO. 1986. Guide to the freshwater aquatic microdrile Oligochaetes of North America. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci 84: 259 pp
  10. Cazaubon A, Giudicelli J. 1999. Impact of the residual flow on the physical characteristics and benthic community (algae, invertebrates)of a regulated Mediterranean river: the Durance, France. Reg Riv Res Manag 15: 441-461 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199909/10)15:5<441::AID-RRR558>3.0.CO;2-9
  11. Changnon SA. 1987. Detecting drought conditions in Illinois. III St Wat Sur Cir 169: 1-36
  12. Cowx IG, Young WO, Hellawell lM. 1984. The influence of drought on the fish and invertebrate populations of an upland stream in Wales. Freshw Bioi 14: 165-177 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.1984.tb00030.x
  13. Cox TF, Cox MAA. 2001. Multidimensional Scaling. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
  14. Dahm CN, Baker MA, Moore DI, Thilbault JR. 2003. Coupled biogeochemical and hydrological responses of streams and rivers to drought. Freshw Bioi 48: 1219-1232 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01082.x
  15. Daniel CL, Scott AR. 2007. Abiotic and biotic factors explain independent gradients of plant community composition in ponderosa pine forests. Ecol Model 205: 231-240 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.02.018
  16. Gjerlov C, Hildrew AG, Jones Jl, 2003 Mobility of stream invertebrates in relation to disturbance and refugia: a test of habitat template theory. J N Am Benth Soc 22: 207-223 https://doi.org/10.2307/1467993
  17. Gore JA. 1977. Reservoir manipulations and benthic macroinvertebrates in a prairie river. Hydrobiologia 55: 113-123 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00021052
  18. Grigg NS. 1996. Water Resources Management. Principles, Regulations, and Cases. McGraw Hill, New York
  19. Hart DD, Clark BD, Jasentuliyana A. 1996. Finescale field measurement of benthic flow environments inhabited by stream invertebrates. Limnol Oceanogr 41: 297-308 https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1996.41.2.0297
  20. Holomuzki JR, Biggs BJF. 1999. Distributional responses to flow disturbance by a stream-dwelling snaile. Oikos 87: 36-47 https://doi.org/10.2307/3546994
  21. Holomuzki JR, Biggs BJF. 2000. Taxon-specific responses to high-flow disturbance in streams: implications for population persistence. J N Am Benthol Soc 19: 670-679 https://doi.org/10.2307/1468125
  22. Imbert JB, Gonzalez JM, Basaguren A, Pozo J. 2005. Influence of inorganic substrata size, leaf litter and woody debris removal on benthic invertebrates resistance to floods in two contrasting headwater streams. Internet Rev Hydrobiol 90(1): 51-70 https://doi.org/10.1002/iroh.200410739
  23. Kinzie RAI, Chong C, Deverll J, Lindstrom D, WolfR. 2006. Effects of water removal on a Hawaiian stream ecosystem. Pacific Sci 60:1-47 https://doi.org/10.1353/psc.2005.0058
  24. Kruskal JB. 1964. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29: 1-27 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289565
  25. Kwak IS, Song MY, Chon TS. 2004. The effects of natural disturbances on benthic macroinvertebratre. Korean J Limnol 37: 8795
  26. Lake PS. 2000 Disturbance, patchiness, and diversity in streams. J N Am Benth Soc 19: 573-592 https://doi.org/10.2307/1468118
  27. Lake PS. 2003 Ecological effects of perturbation by drought in flowing waters. Freshw Bioi 48: 1161-1172 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01086.x
  28. Lee HG. 2008. Effects of floods on aquatic insect communities in a Korean Stream. Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul Women's University, Seoul
  29. Mahecha MD, Martinez A, Lischeida G, Becke E. 2007 Nonlinear dimensionality reduction: Alternative ordination approaches for extracting and visualizing biodiversity patterns in tropical montane forest vegetation data. Ecol Infor 2: 138-149 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2007.05.002
  30. Merritt RW, Cummins KW. 2006. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America. Hunt Publishing Company, Dubugue
  31. Nhiwatiwa T, Bie TD, Vervaeke B, Barson M, Stevens M, Vanhove MPM, Brendonck 1. 2009. Invertebrate communities in dry-season pools of a large subtropical river: patterns and processes. Hydrobiologia 630:169-186 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-009-9790-0
  32. Pennak RW. 1978. Freshwater Invertebrates of the United States. John Wieley and Sons, Inc., New York
  33. Power ME, Stount RJ, Cushing CE, Harper PP, Hauer FR, Matthews WJ, Moyle PB, Statzner B, De Badgen IRW. 1988. Biotic and abiotic controls in river and stream communities. J N Am Benth Soc 7: 456-479 https://doi.org/10.2307/1467301
  34. Quigley M. 1977. Invertebrates of Streams and Rivers: a Key to Identification. Edward Arnold Ltd. London
  35. Resh VH, Brown AV, Covich AP, Gurtz ME, Li HW, Minshall GW, Reice SR, Sheldon AL, Wallace JB, Wissmar R. 1988. The role of disturbance in stream ecology. J N AmBenth Soc 7: 433-455 https://doi.org/10.2307/1467300
  36. Shepard RN. 1962. The analysis of proximities: multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II. Psychometrika 27: 219-246 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289621
  37. Stanley EH, Fisher NB, Grimm NB. 1997. Ecosystem expansion and contraction in streams desert streams vary in both space and time and fluctuate dramatically in size. Bioscience 47: 427-435 https://doi.org/10.2307/1313058
  38. StatSoft Inc. 2004. STATSTICA (data analysis software system), vetsion 7. www.statsoft.com
  39. Suren AM, Jowett IG. 2006. Effects of floods versus low flows on invertebrates in a New Zealand gravel-bed river. Freshw Bioi 51:2207-2227 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01646.x
  40. Ward JV. 1992. Aquatic Insect Ecology. Part I. Biology and Habitat. John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New York
  41. Wiederholm T. (ed) 1983. Chironomidae of the Holarctic region: Keys and Diagnoses. Part I - Larvae. Entomol Scand Suppl 19: 1-457
  42. Wright IF, Berrie AD. 1987. Ecological effects of groundwater pumping and a natural drought on the upper reaches of a chalk stream. Reg Riv Res Manag 1: 145-160 https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450010205
  43. Yoon IB. 1988. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Fauna andFlora of Korea Aquatic Insects, vol. 30. Ministry of Education, Seoul
  44. Zar JR. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. Fourth Edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey

Cited by

  1. Characteristics of Spatiotemporal Patterns in Benthic Macroinvertebrate Communities in Two Adjacent Headwater Streams. vol.51, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2018.51.2.192