Textile Science and Engineering (한국섬유공학회지)

The Korean Fiber Society (한국섬유공학회)
권호 표지

Interpretation of Uni-axial and Tri-axial Compressive Behaviors of Geotextiles Reinforced Soils

토목섬유로 보강한 흙 시료의 일축 및 삼축 압축거동 해석

  • Kim, Hyun-Joong (Textile Materials Division, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Kim, Yoon-Jin (Department of Textile Engineering, Inha University Graduate School) ;
  • Byun, Sung-Won (Gyeonggi Technology Service Center, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology) ;
  • Jo, Chang-Whan (Division of Applied Bio-Chemistry, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Jeon, Han-Yong (Division of Nano-Systems Engineering, Inha University)
  • 김현중 (한국생산기술연구원 섬유융합연구부) ;
  • 김윤진 (인하대학교 대학원 섬유공학과) ;
  • 변성원 (한국생산기술연구원 경기기술지원본부) ;
  • 주창환 (충남대학교 바이오응용화학부) ;
  • 전한용 (인하대학교 나노시스템공학부)
  • Published : 2009.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the effects of geosynthetics reinforcements on compressive behaviors of weathered granite soils were investigated by uni-axial and tri-axial compression tests. Geogrid, geomat, and polyethylene slit film fiber were used as reinforced geosynthetis. From the experimental results, these geosynthetics reinforcement effects could increase the compressive strength of soil and especially, the reinforced effects of geogrid and geomat were extremely excellent compared to polyethylene slit film fiber reinforced. This effect is larger for 3 layer geosynthetics used. For triaxial compression test, despite unconsolidated undrained condition, it is seen that the increasing shear strength of the weathered granite soils is due to the increasing adhesive power.

Keywords

References

  1. R. M. Koerner, 'Designing with Geosynthetics', 5th Ed., Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, USA, 2005, pp.93-152
  2. Y. G. Hsuan and C. Atwell, 'Geotextile Bags and Tubes as Artificial Reefs' Proc. GRI-21 Conference on Geosynthetics in Agriculture and Aquaculture, pp.128-135, Cancuun, Mexico, IFAI Publ., Roseville, MN, 2008
  3. W. Huang and R. M. Koerner, 'An Amendment Strategy for Enhancing the Performance of Geotextile Tubes Used in Decontamination of Polluted Sediments and Sludges', Proc. of the GRI-18 Conference, pp.282-289, 2005
  4. L. Madhavi, S. Vidya, and S. Murthy, 'Effects of Reinforcement Form on the Behavior of Geosynthetic Reinforced Sand', Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2007, 25, 23-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.09.002
  5. M. Heibaum, 'Special Issue on Geotexti1e Containers', Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2002, 20(5), 279-280 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-1144(02)00026-2
  6. R. E. Mackey and G. R. Koerner, 'Biological Clogging of Geotextile Filters-A Five-Year Study', Proc. of Geosynthetics'99, pp.783-798, 1999
  7. H. Y. Jeon and A. Bouazza, 'Tensile Strength of Plasmatreated Nonwoven Geotextiles', Geosynthetics International, 2007, 14(4), 244-247 https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.4.244
  8. H. K. Yoo, H. T. Kim, and H. Y. Jeon, 'Evaluation of Pullout and Drainage Properties of Geosynthetic Reinforcements in Weathered Granite Backfill Soils', Fiber Polym, 2007, 8, 635-641 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02876002
  9. W. A. Marr and B. Christopher, 'Recommended Design Strength for Needle-punched GCL Products', Geotechnical Fabrics Report, 2003, 21(8), 18-23