A Study on Fish Community in Pyeonglim Stream - with Water Quality and Stream Health Assessment in Up- and Downstream of Pyeonglim Dam -

평림천 어류군집에 관한 연구 - 평림댐 상·하류 수질 및 하천건강성평가와 함께 -

  • Seo, Jinwon (Korea Institute of Water and Environment, Korea Water Resources Corporation)
  • 서진원 (한국수자원공사 K-water연구원)
  • Received : 2009.04.09
  • Accepted : 2009.06.20
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

In order to use fundamental data for conservation of species diversity and stream health with dam development, fish investigation in up- and downstream of Pyeonglim Dam was seasonally conducted in 2007~2008. In addition, data of water qualities, investigated for environmental impact assessment, were used to determine a water quality standard level in Pyeonglim Stream, and it revealed that water environment condition was good in the stream. During the study period, a total number of fish caught from the 4 study sites was 5,449 representing 9 families 25 species, and there were 8 Korean endemic species (32.0%) including Rhodeus uyekii, Squalidus gracilis majimae, and Microphysogobio yaluensis. Two species of Zacco temminckii (37.5%) and Zacco platypus (26.3%) were dominant and subdominant in all sites. There were few individuals of the $2^{nd}$-class endangered species (Sand lamprey, Lampetra reissneri) and the introduced species (Bluegill, Lepomis macrochirus), found in the upstream of the dam. and further investigation for conservation of the endangered species and for prevention of the introduced species is needed in future. With fish fauna and multi-metric health assessment model in each sampling attempt, index of biotic integrity(IBI) was evaluated and it resulted mostly in good(26~35) and excellent(36~40) condition in all sites. The results indicate that it is very important to study not only environmental impact assessment with fish composition but also stream health assessment in order to conserve healthy aquatic ecosystem.

Keywords

References

  1. 광산문화원, 1999, 어등산 학술조사 보고서, 289-300
  2. 광주광역시, 2005, 영산강.섬진강 치수대책사업 환경영향조사 결과보고서, 187-210
  3. 광주광역시, 2006, 영산강.섬진강 치수대책사업 환경영향조사 결과보고서, 195-220
  4. 광주광역시, 2007, 영산강.섬진강 치수대책사업 환경영향조사 결과보고서, 283-309
  5. 김동욱, 2004, 환경영향평가, 도서출판 그루
  6. 김익수, 1995, 한국의 위기 담수어류의 서식현황과 보존, 한국생태학회, 어류학회 공동 심포지움 발표 논문집, 31-50
  7. 김익수, 박종영, 2002, 한국의 민물고기, 교학사
  8. 김익수, 최 윤, 이충렬, 이용주, 김병직, 김지현, 2005, 원색한국어류대도감, 교학사, 1-615
  9. 송태곤, 1991, 영산호로 유입되는 수계 소하천의 어류상, 연안생물연구, 8, 21-37
  10. 송태곤, 김재근, 1995, 영산강 본류 상류 수계의 어류상에 대하여, 연안생물연구, 12, 59-69
  11. 송태곤, 양효석, 1995, 영산강 본류 중류 수계의 어류상에 대하여, 연안생물연구, 12, 71-82
  12. 송호복, 백현민, 이춘원, 2005, 담수어류의 종생물 지수를 이용한 강릉 남대천의 수환경평가, 한국환경영향평가학회, 14(4), 237-245
  13. 안광국, 염동혁, 이성규, 2001, 생물보전지수의 신속한 생물평가 기법을 이용한 갑천 수계의평가, 한국육수학회, 19(4), 261-270
  14. 이의행, 윤상훈, 이재훈, 안광국, 2008, 하천 서식지 특성에 따른 피라미(Zacco platypus)의 총수은 함량 및 생태 건강성 분석, 한국하천호수학회, 41(2), 188-197
  15. 최기철, 전상린, 김익수, 손영목, 1990, 원색 한국담수어도감, 향문사, 1-277
  16. 최지웅, 안광국, 2008a, 다각적 수환경지표를 이용한 영산호의 생태영향 평가. 한국하천호수학회, 41(2), 155-165
  17. 최지웅, 안광국, 2008b, 영산강 수계의 어류 종 조성 및 분포특성 분석, 한국하천호수학회,41(3), 301-310
  18. 한국수자원공사, 2006, 섬진강.영산강 유역조사
  19. 한국수자원공사, 2007, '07 평림댐 및 이설도로공사 환경영향조사
  20. 한국수자원공사, 2008a,'08 평림댐 및 이설도로공사 환경영향조사
  21. 한국수자원공사, 2008b, 화북댐 사후환경영향조사
  22. 한정호, 안광국, 2008, 남양호에서 다변수 메트릭모델 적용 및 평가, 한국하천호수학회,41(2), 228-236
  23. 함태성, 2004, 사전환경성검토제도의 법적과제, 한국법제연구원, 1-74
  24. 환경부, 2006, 물환경종합평가방법 개발 조사연구(III) 최종보고서: 수생태 건강성 조사 및 평가 체계 연구, 국립환경과학원
  25. 환경부, 2007, 수생태 건강성 회복을 위한 하천복원모델과 기준. 조사계획 수립 연구 최종보고서(III): 수생태 건강성 조사계획 수립 및 지침
  26. Karr, J. R., 1981, Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities, Fisheries, 6, 21-27 https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2
  27. Margalef, R., 1958, Information theory in ecology, Gen. Syst, 3, 36-71
  28. McNaughton, S. J., 1967, Relationship among functional properties of California grassland, Nature, 216, 168-169
  29. Nelson, J. S., 1994, Fishes of the world(3rd ed.), John Wiley & Sons, New York
  30. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA), 1989, Addendum to Biological Criteria for the Protection of Aquatic Life, Volume II, Users Manual for Biological Field Assessment of Ohio Surface Waters, Division of Water quality Monitoring and Assessment, Surface Water Section, Columbus, Ohio, USA
  31. Pielou, E. C., 1975, Ecological Diversity, Wiley, New York, 165
  32. Shannon, C. E. and Weaver, W., 1949, The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
  33. Strahler, A. N., 1957, Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology, American Geophysical Union Transactions, 38,913-920 https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913
  34. United State Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), 1993, Fish field and laboratory methods for evaluating the biological integrity of surface waters, EPA 600-R-92-111, environmental monitoring systems laboratory-Cincinnati office of Modeling, Monitoring systems, and quality assurance Office of Research Development, USEPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA