물공급시설의 노후 위험도 평가를 통한 개선 우선순위 결정

Decision Making of Improvement Priority by Deterioration Risk Assessment of Water Supply Infrastructures

  • Chae, Soo-Kwon (School of Human & Environmental Sciences., Eulji University) ;
  • Lee, Dae-Jong (School of Electrical Information, Chungbuk University) ;
  • Kim, Ju-Hwan (K-water Research Institute, Korea Water Resources Corp.)
  • 투고 : 2009.10.07
  • 심사 : 2009.12.21
  • 발행 : 2009.12.31

초록

This paper proposes an application methodology of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) based decision making theory for improvement priority by assessment of various risk factors affecting on deterioration of water supply systems, as major social infrastructure. AHP method is organized with three level of hierarchy which is introduced for multi-criteria decision making in this study. In the first level, assessment outputs are calculated by AHP for each affecting factor. In the second level, criteria are estimated by using assessment results with respect to structural and environmental factors. Consequently, ranking decision is performed in the third level. In order to present the effectiveness, a proposed method is compared with FCP(Fuzzy Composite Programming) for decision making. Since the results of the proposed method show better performance with consistent results, it can be applied as an efficient information for the determination for improvement priority of the study infrastructure.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김석우, 2004, 상수관망의 최적 개량 의사결정 시스템 개발-구역별 우선순위 결정, 고려대학교 석사학위논문
  2. 성권식, 김주환, 김재학, 2003, AHP기법과 중회귀 분석을 이용한 관 노후도 평가모델, 한국물환경학회.대한상수도학회 공동춘계학술대회 논문집, 509-512
  3. 일본 수도관로 기술센터, 1996, 관로시설 진단법의 체계화 조사 보고서, 일본 수도관로 기술센터
  4. 한국수자원공사, 1995, 수도관 개량을 위한 의사결정시스템 개발, 한국수자원공사
  5. H. Najjaran, R. Sadiq, and B. B. Rajani, 2004, Modeling pipe deterioration using soil properties - an application of fuzzy logic expert system, ACSE International Conference, 1-10
  6. H. Najjaran, R. Sadiq, and B. B. Rajani, 2006, Fuzzy expert system to asses corrosion of cast/ductile iron pipes from backfill properties, Computer-Aided Vivil and Infrastructure Engineering, 21(1), 67-77 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8667.2005.00417.x
  7. J. M. Yan, and K. Vairavamoorthy, 2003, Prioritizing water mains rehabilitation under uncertainty, Advances in Water Supply Management, 237-246
  8. L. G. Vargas, 1990, An overview of the analytic hierarchy process & its applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 48, 2-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H
  9. Mujgan S. Ozdemir, and Thomas L. Satty, 2006, The unkonwn in decision making. What to do about it, European Journal of Operational Research, 174, 349-359 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.017
  10. R. Sadia, B. Rajani, and Y. Kleiner, 2004, Fuzzy-based method to evaluate soil corrosivity for prediction of water main deterioration, Journal of Infrastructure System, 10(4), 149-156 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2004)10:4(149)
  11. S. C. Cheng, T. C. Chou, C. L. Yang, and H. Y. Chang, 2005, A semantic learning for content-based image retrieval using analytical hierarchy process, Expert Systems with Applications, 28, 495-505 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2004.12.011
  12. Thomas L. Satty, 1994, Highlights and critical points in theory and application of the analytical hierarchy process, European Journal of Operational Research, 74, 426-447 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4