The effect of implant drilling speed on the composition of particle collected during site preparation

  • Jeong, Chang-Hee (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Do-Young (Kim & Jeon dental clinic) ;
  • Shin, Seung-Yun (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Hong, Jong-Rak (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kye, Seung-Beom (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Seung-Min (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • Published : 2009.08.15

Abstract

Purpose: This study was aimed to evaluate the effect of implant drilling speed on the composition of particle size of collected bone debris. Methods: $Br{\aa}nemark$ $System^{(R)}$ drills were used to collect bone debris from 10 drilling holes (1 unit) at 1,500 rpm (Group A) and 800 rpm (Group B) in bovine mandible. After separating particles by size into > 500 ${\mu}m$, between 250 ${\mu}m$ and 500 ${\mu}m$, and < 250 ${\mu}m$ fractions, particle wet volume, dry volume, and weight were measured and the proportion of 3 fractions of bone debris to total wet volume, dry volume and weight was calculated as wet volume % , dry volume % and weight %. Results: No significant differences were found between Group A and B in wet volume, dry volume, and weight. However, of >500 ${\mu}m$ fractions, Group B had significantly higher wet volume %(P = 0.0059) and dry volume %(P = 0.0272) than in Group A. Conclusions: The drilling speed influenced the composition of particle size in collected drilling bone debris. The drilling in 800 rpm produced the more percentage of large particles than in 1,500 rpm. However, the drilling speed didn't effect on total volume of and weight of bone debris.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee Y, Han S, Um H, Kim D. Histologic observation of regenerated bone in human intraosseous Lesion following guided tissue regeneration with calcium carbonate implant and autogenous bone graft J Korean Acad Periodontol 1998;28:263-273 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.1998.28.2.263
  2. Becker W, Schenk R, Higuchi K, Lekholm U, Becker BE. Variations in bone regeneration adjacent to implants augmented with barrier membranes alone or with demineralized freeze-dried bone or autologous grafts: a study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:143-154
  3. Block MS, Kent JN, Kallukaran FU, Thunthy K, Weinberg R. Bone maintenance 5 to 10 years after sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998;56:706-714 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(98)90801-1
  4. Marx RE. Clinical application of bone biology to mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 1994;21:377-392
  5. Seol Y, Lee J, Kye S et al. The effect of PDGF-BB loaded TCP/chitosan microgranules on new bone formation J Korean Acad Periodontol 2002;32:489-500
  6. The effect of PDFG-BB loaded biodeqradable membrane on early healinq stage in quided tissue reqeneration. J Korean Acad Periodontol 1999;29:507-519 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.1999.29.3.507
  7. Cheong H, Kim K, Park Y et al. Osteogenic effects of polyethyleneimine- condensed BMP-2 genes in vitro and in vivo. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2007;37:859-869 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2007.37.4.859
  8. Nkenke E, Radespiel-Troger M, Wiltfang J et al. Morbidity of harvesting of retromolar bone grafts: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:514-521 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130511.x
  9. Schlegel KA, Fichtner G, Schultze-Mosgau S, Wiltfang J. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:53-58
  10. Karacaoglan N, Uysal OA. Use of iliac bone graft for saddle nose deformity. Auris Nasus Larynx 1998;25:49-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0385-8146(97)10015-3
  11. Lauer G, Schilli W. Collected implant cavity borings used as peri-implant osseous augmentation material. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants 1994;9:437-443
  12. Widmark G, Ivanoff CJ. Augmentation of exposed implant threads with autogenous bone chips: prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:178-183 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00115.x
  13. Young MP, Worthington HV, Lloyd RE et al. Bone collected during dental implant surgery: a clinical and histological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:298-303 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130310.x
  14. Zaner DJ, Yukna RA. Particle size of periodontal bone grafting materials. J Periodontol 1984;55:406-409 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1984.55.7.406
  15. Kainulainen VT, Kainulainen TJ, Oikarinen KS, Carmichael RP, Sandor GK. Performance of six bone collectors designed for dental implant surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:282-287 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01199.x
  16. Iyer S, Weiss C, Mehta A. Effects of drill speed on heat production and the rate and quality of bone formation in dental implant osteotomies. Part II: Relationship between drill speed and healing. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:536-540
  17. Iyer S, Weiss C, Mehta A. Effects of drill speed on heat production and the rate and quality of bone formation in dental implant osteotomies. Part I: Relationship between drill speed and heat production. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:411-414
  18. Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S. Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;60:1160-1169 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2002.34992
  19. Hoegel F, Mueller CA, Peter R, Pfister U, Suedkamp NP. Bone debris: dead matter or vital osteoblasts. J Trauma 2004;56:363-367 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TA.0000047811.13196.02
  20. Eriksson RA, Adell R. Temperatures during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:4-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(86)90006-6
  21. Marx RE, Miller RI, Ehler WJ, Hubbard G, Malinin TI. A comparison of particulate allogeneic and particulate autogenous bone grafts into maxillary alveolar clefts in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1984;42:3-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(84)90389-6
  22. Reingewirtz Y, Szmukler-Moncler S, Senger B. Influence of different parameters on bone heating and drilling time in implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:189-197 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080305.x
  23. Anitua E, Carda C, Andia I. A novel drilling procedure and subsequent bone autograft preparation: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:138-145
  24. Savant TD, Smith KS, Sullivan SM, Owen WL. Bone volume collected from dental implant sites during osteotomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:905-907 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.25027
  25. Lee SH, Yoon HJ, Park MK, Kim YS. Guided bone regeneration with the combined use of resorbable membranes and autogenous drilling dust or xenografts for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects around implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:1089-1094
  26. Mellonig JT. Decalcified freeze-dried bone allograft as an implant material in human periodontal defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1984;4:40-55
  27. Shapoff CA, Bowers GM, Levy B, Mellonig JT, Yukna RA. The effect of particle size on the osteogenic activity of composite grafts of allogeneic freeze-dried bone and autogenous marrow. J Periodontol 1980;51:625-630 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1980.51.11.625
  28. Sampath TK, Reddi AH. Homology of bone-inductive proteins from human, monkey, bovine, and rat extracellular matrix. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1983;80:6591-6595 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.80.21.6591