Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지

A comparative clinical study on oxidized titanium implants and sandblasted large-grit acid etched implants in soft bone

  • Lee, Jun-Young (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Song, Ji-Eun (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2009.08.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the survival rate of oxidized titanium implants and sandblasted large-grit acid etched implants in soft bone. Methods: 201 oxidized titanium implants were inserted in 84 patients between May 1999 and May 2004. 120 sandblasted large-grit acid etched implants were inserted in 74 patients between December 2000 and May 2004. The patients were followed-up 0${\sim}$5 years in ITI group or 0${\sim}$6 years in BRA group, respectively. The following information was collected from the patient records: age, gender, systemic disease, implant type, number, length and diameter of the implants, their location in the jaws, bone quantity, the number of failed implants, the causes of failure, and advanced surgery for bone augmentation. Results: In the oxidized titanium implants, 8 implants showed early failure, and 1 implant showed late failure, respectively. The cumulative survival rate was 95.48%. In the sandblasted large-grit acid etched implants, 1 implant showed late failure and cumulative survival rate was 99.10%. The cumulative survival rate and the survival rates in the case of the advanced procedure during the implant placement were not significantly different in both groups. Conclusions: Oxidized titanium implants and sandblasted large-grit acid etched implants can be used successfully in soft bone regardless of the surgical methods used during the implant placement. (J Korean Acad Periodontol 2009;39:205-212)

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting direct bone anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-170 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  2. Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-432 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120501.x
  3. Boyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980;38:613-616
  4. Tatum OH. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstruction. Dent Clin North Am 1986;30:207-229
  5. Summers RB. The osteotome technique: Part Ⅲ: Less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium 1994;15:698,700,702-704
  6. Buser D, Dula K, Lang NP, Nyman S. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in bone regenerated with the membrane technique. Five-year results of a prostective study with 12 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:175-183 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070212.x
  7. Fugazzotto PA. Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 72 to 133 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:77-83
  8. Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152,154-156, 158
  9. Pinholt EM. Brånemark and ITI dental implants in the human bone grafted maxilla: a comparative evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:584-592 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140508.x
  10. Astrand P, Engquist B, Anzen B et al. A three-year follow-up report of a comparative study of ITI dental implants $^{\circledR}$ and Brånemark System$^{\circledR}$ implants in the treatment of the partially edentulous maxilla. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:130-141 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00213.x
  11. Kang NW, Jung UW, Choi SH et al. Bone added osteotome sinus floor elevation with simultaneous placement of Branamark Ti-Unite and ITI SLA implants. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2005;35:609-621 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2005.35.3.609
  12. Hong SB, Chai GJ, Jung UW et al. Clinical evaluation of Branemark Ti-Unite implant and ITI SLA implant in the post maxillary area with sinus elevation technique. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2005;35:813-822 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2005.35.4.813
  13. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparations. In: Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albretksson T, eds. Tissue-integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc; 1985:199-220
  14. Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants: 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1990.010105.x
  15. Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 1958;6:699-712
  16. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, Linden U. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:129-134
  17. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:129-134
  18. Jaffin R, Berman C. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type Ⅳ bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  19. Wilke HJ, Claes L, Stenemann S. Clinical implant material. In: Heimke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC, eds. Advances in biomaterials. Vol. 9. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishing Co Inc; 1990:390
  20. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-619
  21. Henry P, Tan A, Allan B, Hall J, Johansson C. Removal torque comparison of TiUnite and turned implants in the Greyhound dog mandible. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000;1:15-17
  22. Glauser R, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P et al. Stability measurements of immediately loaded machined and oxidized implants in the posterior maxilla. A comparative clinical study using resonance frequency analysis. Appl Osseointegration Res 2001;2:27-29
  23. Lee ES, Ahn YB, Lee WJ, Kim HS. Survival rate of implant placement in the maxilla treated with sinus elevation by the lateral approach: A retrospective study. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:589-594 https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2008.38.4.589
  24. Glauser R, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Brånemark TiUnite$^{TM}$ implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:s52-s59 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00075.x
  25. Friberg B, Dahlin C, Widmark G, Ostman PO, Billstrom C. One-year results of a prospective multicenter study on Branemark System$^{\circledR}$ implants with a TiUnite$^{TM}$ surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:s70-75 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00077.x
  26. Stricker A, Voss PJ, Gutwald R, Schramm A, Schmelzeisen R. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone grafts to enable placement of SLA-surfaced implants: preliminary results after 15-40 months. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:207-212 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140211.x
  27. Glauser R, Gottlow J, Lundgren AK et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark Mk Ⅳ TiUnite$^{TM}$ implants placed in bone quality type 4. Appl Osseointegration Res 2002;3:22-24
  28. Vanden Bogaerde L, Pedretti G, Dellacasa P et al. Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles, using Branemark System$^{\circledR}$ TiUnite$^{TM}$ implants: An 18-month prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:121-129 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00219.x
  29. Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J, Rangert B. Immediate function of single and partial reconstructions in the maxilla using Mk Ⅳ fixtures: A retrospective analysis. Appl Osseointegration Res 2001;2:22-26
  30. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-638 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01209.x
  31. Ferrigno N, Laureti M. Surgical advantages with ITI TE$^{\circledR}$ implants placement in conjunction with split crest technique: 18-month results of an ongoing prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:147-155 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01125.x
  32. Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J, Butler B. ITI implant use in private practice: Clinical results with 5,526 implants followed up to 72+ months in function. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:408-412
  33. Luongo G, Raimondo R, Filippini P, Gualini F, Paoleschi C. Early loading of sandblasted, acid-etched implants in the posterior maxilla and mandible: A 1-year follow-up report from a multicenter 3-year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:84-91
  34. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM et al. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants: Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:150-157 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00978.x
  35. Nordin T, Nilsson R, Frykholm A, Hallman M. A 3-arm study of early loading of rough-surfaced implants in the completely edentulous maxilla and in the edentulous posterior maxilla and mandible: results after 1 year of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:880-886
  36. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI$^{\circledR}$ implants in the posterior mandible: A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:142-149 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01014.x
  37. Vanden Bogaerde L, Rangert B, Wendelhag I. Immediate / early function of Branemark System$^{\circledR}$ TiUnite$^{TM}$ implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles: An 18-month prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:s121-s130 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00084.x