Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Korean Association of Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons (대한악안면성형재건외과학회)
권호 표지

CLINICAL STUDY ON SURVIVAL RATE OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS

골유착성 치과 임플란트의 생존율에 관한 임상적 연구

  • Choi, Ji-Yeon (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Koh, Se-Wook (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Ryu, Hwun-Wook (Implant center, Daejeon Dental Hospital, Wonkwang University)
  • 최지연 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 고세욱 (원광대학교 치과대학 구강악안면외과학교실) ;
  • 류현욱 (원광대학교 대전치과병원 임플란트 센터)
  • Published : 2009.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of the present review was to evaluate survival rate and various factors associated with survival of osseointegrated implants. Patients and methods: The clinical comparisons were performed to evaluate survival rate of 794 endosseous implants that had been inserted between 2004 through 2008 in relation to sex and age of patients, position of implant, implant system and surface characteristics, length and diameter of implant, and bone graft technique. Results: The survival rate of implant was 94.3% in posterior area of maxilla and 98.6% in posterior area of mandible by position of implant, a statistically significant difference. As to diameter of implant, survival rate was 98.4% between the 4.0 and 4.5 mm and 75.0% in larger than 5.0 mm, that was statistically significant difference. There was a statistically significant difference regard to bone graft and surgical technique. The implant survival rate was 89.0% in a placement site which performed sinus lifting, and in case of implant placement with guided bone regeneration technique and without bone grafting was 97.6% and 100% each. Conclusion: According to these findings, this study establishes a relationship between survival rate of implant and position, surface characteristics, diameter of implant and bone graft technique.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae JY, Shin SW, Cho HJ et al : A 10-year retrospective clinical study of Branemark implants. J prosthet Dent 72 : 629, 1994
  2. Kim YS, Lee DK, Min SK et al : Clinical study on success rate of osseointegrated dental implants. Korea Assoc Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 24 : 137, 2002
  3. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U et al : Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. Eur J Oral Sci 106 : 527, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x
  4. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U et al : Long term follow up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5 : 347, 1990
  5. Zarb GA, Schhmitt A : The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 72 : 616, 1994
  6. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I : "Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology". Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co 242, 1999
  7. Albrekktsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA et al : Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long lasting, direct bone to implant anchorage in man. Acta Ortho Scand 52 : 155, 1981 https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  8. Buser D, Mericske-stern R, Bernard JP et al : Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res Jun 8(3) : 161, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  9. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM et al : The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and etched (SLA) surface : early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 13 : 144, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  10. Atwood DA : Reduction of residual ridges; a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent 26 : 266, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90069-2
  11. Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK, Rungcharassaeng K : Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Det 81 : 537, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70208-8
  12. Lazzara RJ, Testori T, Porter SS : A human histologic analysis of osseotite and machined surface using implants with two opposing surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 19 : 3, 1999
  13. Davies JE : Mechanism of endosseous integration. Int J Posthodont 11 : 391, 1998
  14. Mark S. Scurria et al : Prognostic variables associated with implant failure; a retrospective effectiveness study. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 13 : 400, 1998
  15. Robert Haas, Nikoletta Mensdorff-Poui : Survival of 1,920 IMZ implants followed for up to 100 months. Int J Oral maxillofacial implants Vol.11, No.5 581, 1996
  16. Kim JS, Chang HH et al : Preprothetic stage dental implant failure. J KAOMS 2 : 178, 2001
  17. Misch CE : Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants; organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Impalntol 4 : 49, 1987
  18. Robert A, Jaffin and Charles l, Berman : The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV Bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 62 : 2, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  19. Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F et al : Early loading of sandblasted and acid etched (SLA) implants: a prospective splitmouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 12 : 572, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120604.x
  20. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M et al : Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 28 : 2, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2
  21. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S et al : Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore confirmations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 23 : 491, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00131-4
  22. Kim BS, Min SK : Effects of implant surface treatment on osseointegration with resonance frequency analysis in mini-pig. Journal of Wonkwang Dental Research Institute 15-1 : 119, 2006
  23. Aalam A-A, Nowzari H : Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 : 793, 2005
  24. Oh KC, Chae GJ et al : A retrospective study on Branemark $TiUnite^{\circledR}$ implant for mandibular posterior single tooth replacement. The Journal of Korean academy of periodontolog 37: 4, 2007
  25. Ivanoff CJ, Groendahl K, Sennerby L et al : Influence of variation in implant diameters : a 3 to 5 year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14 : 173, 1999
  26. Winkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S : Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Annals of periodontology 5 : 22, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2000.5.1.22
  27. Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L : Clincal outcome of Branemark system implants of various diameters: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17 : 671, 2002
  28. Hultin-Mordenfeld M, Johansson A, Hedin M et al : A retrospective clinical study of wide-diameter implants used in posterior edentulous areas. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 : 387, 2004
  29. Shin SW, Ross Bryant, Zarb G et al : A retrospective study on the treatment outcome of wide-bodied implants. Int J Prosthet Dent 17 : 52, 2004
  30. Becktor JP, Isaksson S, Sennerby L : Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and non-grafted edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19 : 107, 2004
  31. Fugazzotto PA : Success and failure rates of osseointegrated implants in function in regenerated bone for 72 to 133 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20 : 77, 2005
  32. Jensen OT : The sinus bone graft, 2nd ed. Quintessence Publishing Co. 63, 2006
  33. Tong DC, Rioux K, Drangsholt M et al : A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13 : 175, 1998
  34. Boyne PJ, James RA : Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 38(8) : 613, 1980
  35. Summers RB : A new concept in maxillary implant surgery : the osteotome technique. Compendium 15 : 154, 1994
  36. Zitzmann NU, Scharer P : Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 85 : 8, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(98)90391-2