DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Noisy Band Removal Using Band Correlation in Hyperspectral lmages

  • Huan, Nguyen Van (School of Information and Communication Engineering, INHA University) ;
  • Kim, Hak-Il (School of Information and Communication Engineering, INHA University)
  • Published : 2009.06.28

Abstract

Noise band removal is a crucial step before spectral matching since the noise bands can distort the typical shape of spectral reflectance, leading to degradation on the matching results. This paper proposes a statistical noise band removal method for hyperspectral data using the correlation coefficient between two bands. The correlation coefficient measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two random variables. Considering each band of the hyperspectral data as a random variable, the correlation between two signal bands is high; existence of a noisy band will produce a low correlation due to ill-correlativeness and undirected ness. The unsupervised k-nearest neighbor clustering method is implemented in accordance with three well-accepted spectral matching measures, namely ED, SAM and SID in order to evaluate the validation of the proposed method. This paper also proposes a hierarchical scheme of combining those measures. Finally, a separability assessment based on the between-class and the within-class scatter matrices is followed to evaluate the applicability of the proposed noise band removal method. Also, the paper brings out a comparison for spectral matching measures. The experimental results conducted on a 228-band hyperspectral data show that while the SAM measure is rather resistant, the performance of SID measure is more sensitive to noise.

Keywords

References

  1. Damien Letexier and Salah Bourennane, 2008. Noise Removal From Hyperspectral Images by Multidimensional Filtering, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(7), July: 2061-2069 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.916641
  2. Fukunaga, K. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition, Academic Press, 1990, 445-448
  3. Goetz, A. F. H., 1991. Imaging spectrometry for studying Earth, Air, Fire and Water, EARSeL Advances in Remote Sensing, 1: 3-15
  4. Green, A. A., Berman, M., Switzer, P., and Craig, M. D., 1988. A transformation for ordering multispectral data in terms of image quality with implications for noise removal: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 26(1): 65-74 https://doi.org/10.1109/36.3001
  5. Kim, S. H., S. J. Kang, J. H. Chi, and K. S. Lee, 2007. Absolute atmospheric correction procedure for EO-1 Hyperion data using MODTRAN code, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(1): 7-14 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2007.23.1.7
  6. R. Ian Faulconbridge, R. I., Mark R. Pickering, M. R., and Michael J. Ryan M. J. 2006. Unsupervised band removal leading to improved classification accuracy of hyperspectral images: Proceedings of the 29th Australasian Computer Science Conference - Volume 48, Hobart, Australia, 43-48
  7. Yingzi Du et al., 2004. New hyperspectral discrimination measure for spectral characterization, Optical Engineering, 43: 1777-1786 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.1766301
  8. Yuhas, R. H., Goetz, A. F. H., and Boardman, J. W., 1992. Discrimination among semiarid landscape endmembers using the spectral angle mapper (SAM) algorithm. In Summaries of the Third Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, JPL Publication 92-14, 1: 147-149
  9. van der Meer, F. and S. de Jong, 2001. Imaging Spectrometry: Basic Principles and Prospective Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers