DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wavelet Pair Noise Removal for Increasing the Classification Accuracy of a Remotely Sensed Image

  • Jin, Hong-Sung (Applied Mathematics Department, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yoo, Hee-Young (Earth Science Education Department, Seoul National University) ;
  • Eom, Joo-Young (Earth Science Education Department, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, II-Su (Applied Mathematics Department, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Han, Dong-Yeob (Applied Mathematics Department, Chonnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.06.28

초록

The noise removal as a preprocessing was tried with various kinds of wavelet pairs. Wavelet transform for 2D images generally uses the same wavelets as basis functions in horizontal and vertical directions. A method with different wavelets was tried for each direction separately, which gives more precise interpretation of the classification. Total 486 pairs of wavelets from nine basis functions were tried to remove image noises. The classification accuracies before and after the noise removal were compared. Although all kinds of wavelet pairs showed the increased accuracies in classification, there were best and worst wavelet pairs depending on the data sets. Wavelet pairs with low energy percentage of LL band showed the high classification accuracy. A pattern was found in the results that very similar vertical accuracy was distributed for each horizontal ones. Since Haar is the shortest length filter, Haar could be a predictor wavelet to find the good wavelet pairs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Boucheron, L. E. and C. D. Creusere, 2005. Lossless wavelet-based compression of digital elevation maps for fast and efficient search and retrieval, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 43(5): 1210-1214 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.841477
  2. Bruce, L. M., A. Mathur, and J. D. Byrd Jr., 2006. Denoising and wavelet-based feature extraction of MODIS multitemporal vegetation signatures, GIScience and Remote Sensing, 43(1): 67-77 https://doi.org/10.2747/1548-1603.43.1.67
  3. Daubechies, I., 1992. Ten lectures on wavelets, CBMS, SIAM, 61: 194-202 https://doi.org/10.2277/0898712742
  4. Kaplan, I., 2001. Applying the Haar Wavelet Transform to Time Series Information, http://www.bearcave.com/misl/misl_tech/wavelets/simple_filters/index.html
  5. Koger, C. H., L. M. Bruce, D. R. Shawa, and K. N. Reddyc, 2003. Wavelet analysis of hyperspectral reflectance data for detecting pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) in soybean (Glycine max), Remote Sensing of Environment, 86(1): 108-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00071-3
  6. Pajares, G. and J. M. Cruz, 2004. A wavelet-based image fusion tutorial, Pattern Recognition, 37(9): 1855-1872 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2004.03.010
  7. Solbø, S. and T. Eltorft, 2004. Homomorphic Wavelet-Based Statistical Despeckling of SAR Images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(4): 711-720 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.821885
  8. Tso, B. and R. C. Olsen, 2005. A contextual classification scheme based on MRF model with improved parameter estimation and multiscale fuzzy line process, Remote Sensing of Environment, 97(1): 127-136 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.04.021
  9. Yoo, H. Y., K. Lee, and B. D. Kwon, 2008a. A Comparative Study of 3D DWT Based Space-borne Image Classification for Different Types of Basis Function, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(1): 57-64 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2008.24.1.57
  10. Yoo, H. Y., K. Lee, H. S. Jin, and B. D. Kwon, 2008b. Selecting Optimal Basis Function with Energy Parameter in Image Classification Based on Wavelet Coefficients, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 24(5): 437-444 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2008.24.5.437
  11. Yunhao, C., D. Lei, L. Jing, L. Xiaobing, and S. Peijun, 2006, A new wavelet-based image fusion method for remotely sensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(7): 1465-1476 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500474365