Journal of Korean Dental Science

Korean Academy of Dental Science (대한치의학회)
권호 표지

Prospective Clinical Trial of Survival Rate for Two Different Implant Surfaces Using the Osstem(R) SS II Non-submerged Implant System in Partially Edentulous Patients

  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Lim, Chae-Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Min-Seok (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Park, Jin-Sung (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Seo-Yoon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Seol, Ka-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • Received : 2009.06.30
  • Accepted : 2009.09.28
  • Published : 2009.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : This study sought to investigate the clinical survival rate of two implants with different surfaces: resorbable blasting media (RBM)-treated and calcium metaphosphate (CMP)-coated implant. Study design : SSII non-submerged implants (Osstem, Seoul, Korea) were placed in a total of 48 patients with mean age of 38.8. At least 31 patients in the experimental group had a CMP-coated implant, and 1 patient in the control group received a, RBM surface implant. The evaluation period was between April 2006 and December 2007. Radiographs, periotest, clinical periodontal examination, and prosthetic adjustment and occlusion were used. Results : The survival rate of the experimental and control groups after 1 year was 97.2% and 100%, respectively. The Wald confidence interval reported for the experimental group was not inferior to the control group. Conclusion : No significant differences were found between the RBM and CMP groups. The observed data suggest that CMP-coated methods can provide favorable clinical results for the functioning and healing of dental implants.

Keywords

References

  1. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25.
  2. Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Papaioannou W, Van Eldere J, van Steenberghe D. The influence of titanium abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and gingivitis: short-term observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 169-178.
  3. Pillar RM. Porous-surfaced metallic implants for orthopedic application. J Biomed Mat Res 1987; 21: 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210106
  4. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Persson LG, Lindhe J. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 448-455. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00693.x
  5. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pig. J Biomed Mat Res 1991; 25: 889-902. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  6. Agresti A: Categorical Data Analysis, 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2002.
  7. Cook SD, Kay JF, Thomas KA, Jarcho M. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for dental implat applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2: 15-22.
  8. Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987; 45: 601-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(87)90270-9
  9. Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rao W, Rebaudi A. Bone-implant contact and bone quality: Evaluation of expected and actual bone contact on machined and osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2002; 22: 535-545.
  10. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to mechined and resorbable blast material titanium implats: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002; 28: 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2
  11. Sanz A, Oyarz?n A, Farias D, Diaz I. Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Implant Dent 2001; 10: 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200104000-00009
  12. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, Peters F, Simpson JP. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched(SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  13. Kasuga T, Ota Y, Nogami M, Abe Y. Surface modification of calcium metaphosphate fibers. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2000; 11: 223-225. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008916226079
  14. El Sayegh TY, Pilliar RM, McCulloch CA. Attachment, spreading, and matrix formation by human gingival fibroblasts on porousstructured titanium alloy and calcium polyphosphate substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 61: 482-492. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10217
  15. Kim SG, Oh DS. Placement of calcium metaphosphate-coated dental implants in the posterior maxilla: case reports. Hosp Dent (Tokyo) 2008; 20: 39-43.
  16. Yang C. The effect of calcium phosphate implant coating on osteoconduction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 606-609. https://doi.org/10.1067/moe.2001.118477
  17. Lee YM, Seol YJ, Lim YT, Kim S, Han SB, Rhyu IC, Baek SH, Heo SJ, Choi JY, Klokkevold PR, Chung CP. Tissue-engineered growth of bone by marrow cell transplantation using porous calcium metaphosphate matrices. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54: 216-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4636(200102)54:2<216::AID-JBM8>3.0.CO;2-C
  18. Yeo IS, Han JS, Yang JH. Biomechanical and histomorphometric study of dental implants with different surface characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008; 87: 303-311.
  19. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In: Brenemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsonn T. Tissue Integrated prostheses: Osseointegration in Clincal Dentistry. Chicago. Quintessence publishing Co. 1985; 199-209.
  20. Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, Harnett J, Jemt T, Johns RB, McKenna S, McNamara DC, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brenemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 33-42.
  21. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodentol 1991; 62: 2-4. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1991.62.1.2
  22. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70208-8
  23. Bryant SR. The effect of age, jaw site, and bone conditions on oral implant outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 470-490.