The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison on accuracy of porcelain color reproducibility using two colorimeters

2종의 측색기에 의한 도재 색조 재현의 정확성 비교

  • Lee, Tai-Il (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research(ICDR), Korea University) ;
  • Ahn, Jin-Soo (Department of Dental Biomaterials Science School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Soo (Department of Preventive Dentistry, Korea University Guro Hospital) ;
  • Shin, Sang-Wan (Department of Advanced Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Institute for Clinical Dental Research(ICDR), Korea University)
  • 이태일 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 고급치과보철학과, 임상치의학연구소) ;
  • 안진수 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과생체재료과학교실) ;
  • 김영수 (고려대학교 구로병원 예방치과) ;
  • 신상완 (고려대학교 임상치의학대학원 고급치과보철학과, 임상치의학연구소)
  • Published : 2009.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Statement of problem: Although the use of colorimeter to improve the accuracy of tooth color measurement has increased, it is real situation that there is almost no comparative study about the accuracy among various colorimeters. Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of porcelain color reproducibility using ShadeEye-Ncc dental chroma meter (Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan) and Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system (Degudent Inc., Hanau, Germany). Material and methods: Color of 2M2 and 3M2 shade tap of Vitapan 3D Master shade guide were measured using the above two colorimeters. Porcelain specimens were fabricated through this data. The porcelain systems used were Vintage Halo Porcelain system with ShadeEye-Ncc dental chroma meter, and VitaOmega900 Porcelain system with Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system. Colors of shade tap models and porcelain specimen were measured with spectrophotometer, and calculated delta E based on the results. Results: The following results were obtained. 1. Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system showed more suitable porcelain color reproducibility compared to ShadeEye-Ncc dental chroma meter (P <.05). 2. The result showed the difference of porcelain color reproducibility according to shade of Shade tap which is model. More suitable porcelain color reproducibility was shown at 3M2 shade tap than at 2M2 shade tap (P <.05). 3. The average of ${\Delta}E*$ of porcelain specimens which was made by the two colorimeters was 4.44-6.14, so the difference of shade was shown through the naked eye. Conclusion: Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system showed more suitable porcelain color reproducibility. When using ShadeEye-Ncc dental chromameter, it will be necessary to improve accuracy through coloring various parts of the whole tooth.

연구 목적: ShadeEye-Ncc dental chroma meter (Shofu Inc., Kyoto, Japan)와 Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system (Degudent Inc., Hanau, Germany)의 도재색조 재현의 정확성을 비교연구하여 보고자 함이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: ShadeEye-Ncc dental chroma meter와 Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system을 사용하여 Vitapan 3D Master shade guide의 2M2와 3M2 shade tap.을 측색하고, 이 자료를 통하여 shade guide tap. 형태로 도재시편을 제작한다. 시편제작 시 사용하는 porcelain system은 ShadeEye-Ncc dental chroma meter는 Vintage Halo Porcelain system을, Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system은 VitaOmega900 Porcelain system을 사용한다. 모델인 shade tap.과 제작된 도재시편을 spectrophotometer로 측색하고, 그 결과를 토대로하여 ${\Delta}E$를 계산하여, 두 측색기의 정확성을 비교검증하였다. 결과: 1. Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system이 ShadeEye-Ncc dental chroma meter에 비하여 더 적합한 도재색조 재현성을 나타내었다 (P <.05). 2. 모델인 Shade tap.의 shade에 따라서 도재색조 재현성에 차이를 나타내었다. 2M2 shade tap.에 비하여 3M2 shade tap.에서 더 적합한 도재색조 재현성을 나타내었다 (P <.05). 3. 두 측색기 모두에서 제작된 도재시편의 ${\Delta}E$가 평균4.44-6.14로 육안으로 구분 가능한 정도의 색조차이를 보였다. 결론: Shadepilot$^{TM}$ system이 비교적 더 정확한 도재색조 재현성을 나타낸다고 할 수 있으며, ShadeEye-Ncc dental chroma meter를 사용할 때는 치아 전체의 여러부분에서 측색을 하여 정확성을 높이는 것이 필요하리라 생각된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Clark EB. An Analysis of Tooth Color. J Am Dent Ass 1931;18:2093-103 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1931.0317
  2. Clark EB. Tooth Color Selection. J Am Dent Ass 1933;20:1065-73 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1933.0149
  3. Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Color comparison of two shade guides. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:73-8
  4. Sproull RC. Color matching in dentistry. II. Practical applications of the organization of color. J Prosthet Dent 1973;29:556-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90036-X
  5. Grajower R, Revah A, Sorin S. Reflectance spectra of natural and acrylic resin teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:570-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90307-3
  6. Cernavin I. Effects of chlorine-containing disinfecting compounds on shade guides made of acrylic resin. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:574 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90466-7
  7. Sykora O. Fabrication of a posterior shade guide for removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:287-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90033-1
  8. Macentee M, Lakowski R. Instrumental colour measurement of vital and extracted human teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8:203-8 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00494.x
  9. Goodkind RJ, Schwabacher WB. Use of a fiber-optic colorimeter for in vivo color measurements of 2830 anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:535-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90380-5
  10. Kim LK, Cho IH, Shin SY. The Reproducibility of various porcelain color selection systems using spectrophotometry. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:544-55
  11. Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, H¨ammerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:578-82 https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910208100815
  12. Sung CR, Cho IH, Lee JH. Shade analysis of artificial teeth using shade scan system. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:443-57
  13. McPhee ER. Light and color in dentistry. Part I--Nature and perception. J Mich Dent Assoc 1978;60:565-72
  14. Goodkind RJ, Keenan KM, Schwabacher WB. A comparison of Chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurements of 100 natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:105-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90077-0
  15. Jorgenson MW, Goodkind RJ. Spectrophotometric study of five porcelain shades relative to the dimensions of color, porcelain thickness, and repeated firings. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:96-105 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90335-4
  16. Seghi RR, Johnston WM, O’Brien WJ. Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:35-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90279-9
  17. Esquivel JF, Chai J, Wozniak WT. Color stability of lowfusing porcelains for titanium. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:479-85
  18. Seghi RR, Hewlett ER, Kim J. Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1760-4 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120801

Cited by

  1. 20대 대학생들의 상악중절치 색조와 구강보건 및 식습관 관련 특성 vol.12, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2012.12.2.261
  2. 2종 측색기와 시각을 이용한 자연치아의 색조 비교 분석 vol.29, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2013.29.1.081