DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Biomechanical evaluation of dental implants with different surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits

  • Koh, Jung-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University & Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Yang, Jae-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University & Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University & Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Jai-Bong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University & Dental Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Hun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University & Dental Research Institute)
  • 발행 : 2009.07.31

초록

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM. Macroscopic and especially microscopic properties of implant surfaces play a major role in the osseous healing of dental implants. Dental implants with modified surfaces have shown stronger osseointegration than implants which are only turned (machined). Advanced surface modification techniques such as anodic oxidation and Ca-P application have been developed to achieve faster and stronger bonding between the host bone and the implant. PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of surface treatment of titanium dental implant on implant stability after insertion using the rabbit tibia model. MATERIAL AND METHODS. Three test groups were prepared: sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched (SLA) implants, anodic oxidized implants, and anodized implants with Ca-P immersion. The turned implants served as control. Twenty rabbits received 80 implants in the tibia. Resonance frequencies were measured at the time of implant insertion, 2 weeks and 4 weeks of healing. Removal torque values (RTV) were measured 2 and 4 weeks after insertion. RESULTS. The implant stability quotient (ISQ) values of implants for resonance frequency analysis (RFA) increased significantly (P <. 05) during 2 weeks of healing period although there were no significant differences among the test and control groups (P >. 05). The test and control implants also showed significantly higher ISQ values during 4 weeks of healing period (P < .05). No significant differences, however, were found among all the groups. All the groups showed no significant differences in ISQ values between 2 and 4 weeks after implant insertion (P >. 05). The SLA, anodized and Ca-P immersed implants showed higher RTVs at 2 and 4 weeks of healing than the machined one (P < .05). However, there was no significant difference among the experimental groups. CONCLUSION. The surface-modified implants appear to provide superior implant stability to the turned one. Under the limitation of this study, however, we suggest that neither anodic oxidation nor Ca-P immersion techniques have any advantage over the conventional SLA technique with respect to implant stability.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Lekovic V, Beumer J 3rd, Moy PK, Lewis S. Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types of endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:491-6.
  2. Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, Krozer A, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002;23:491-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00131-4
  3. Ellingsen JE. Surface configurations of dental implants. Periodontology 2000 1998;17:36-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1998.tb00121.x
  4. You C, Yeo IS, Kim MD, Eom TK. Characterization and in vivo evaluation of calcium phosphate coated cp-titanium by dip-spin method. Curr Appl Phys 2005;5:501-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2005.01.020
  5. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
  6. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070308.x
  7. Meredith N. On the clinical measurement of implant stability, osseointegration, PhD thesis, Department of Handicap Research, Goteborg University, Sweden, 1997.
  8. Huang HM, Chiu CL, Yeh CY, Lin CT, Lin LH, Lee SY. Early detection of implant healing process using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:437-43. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00818.x
  9. Kim YH, Koak JY, Chang IT, Wennerberg A, Heo SJ. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:349-56.
  10. You C, Yeo IS, Kim MD, Eom TK. Characterization and in vivo evaluation of calcium phosphate coated cp-titanium by dip-spin method. Curr Appl Phys 2005;5:501-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2005.01.020
  11. Yeo IS, Han JS, Yang JH. Biomechanical and Histomorphometric Study of Dental Implants with different surface characteristics. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2008;87B:303-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31104
  12. Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurement to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:234-43. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.x
  13. Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim S, Kim K. Surface characteristics and structure of anodic oxide films containing Ca and P on a titanium implant material. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:333-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10105
  14. Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Lekohm U. Influence of mono and bicortical anchorage on the titanium implants. A study in rabbit tibia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;25:229-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(96)80036-1
  15. Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericsson LE. A histomorphometric and biomechanical comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:62-71.
  16. Oh SH, Lee DJ, Jeong JH, Kim YK. Cytotoxicity of calcium metaphosphate coated on cp-titanium. Key Eng Mater 2002; 218-20:256-8.
  17. Choi JW, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lim YJ, Kim SH, Lee JB. Bone responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:889-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01669.x
  18. Larsson C, Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface-modified titanium implants: Studies on the early tissue response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 1996;17:605-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(96)88711-4
  19. M.M. Shalabi, A. Gortemaker, M.A. Van't Hof Implant Surface roughness and bone healing : a systematic review. J Dent Res 2006; 85:496-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500603
  20. Wennerberg A, Ohlsson R, Rosen BG, Andersson B. Characterizing three-dimensional topography of engineering and biomaterial surfaces by confocal laser scanning and stylus techniques. Med Eng Phys 1996;18:548-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4533(95)00005-4

피인용 문헌

  1. Evaluation of Early Bone Response to Fluoride-Modified and Anodically Oxidized Titanium Implants Through Continuous Removal Torque Analysis vol.21, pp.5, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e31826917f6
  2. Removal torque analysis of chemically modified hydrophilic and anodically oxidized titanium implants with constant angular velocity for early bone response in rabbit tibia vol.10, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-012-1086-1
  3. The Ultrastructural Relationship Between Osteocytes and Dental Implants Following Osseointegration vol.18, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12257
  4. In vivo monitoring of implant osseointegration in a rabbit model using acoustic sound analysis vol.32, pp.4, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22574
  5. Long-term retrospective follow-up of turned and moderately rough implants in the edentulous jaw vol.27, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12602
  6. Occurrence of Progressive Bone Loss Around Anodized Surface Implants and Resorbable Blasting Media Implants: A Retrospective Cohort Study vol.88, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2016.160342
  7. Investigation of a Passive Sensor Array for Diagnosis of Loosening of Endoprosthetic Implants vol.13, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.3390/s130100001
  8. Evaluation of Chemical Mechanical Polishing-Based Surface Modification on 3D Dental Implants Compared to Alternative Methods vol.11, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11112286
  9. Comparison of Osseointegration of Five Different Surfaced Titanium Implants pp.1049-2275, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004572
  10. Hydroxyapatite Nanorod-Modified Sand Blasted Titanium Disk for Endosseous Dental Implant Applications vol.15, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13770-018-0151-9
  11. A 5-year randomized clinical trial comparing minimally with moderately rough implants in patients with severe periodontitis vol.45, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12901
  12. Titanium Surface Coating with a Laminin-Derived Functional Peptide Promotes Bone Cell Adhesion vol.2013, pp.None, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/638348
  13. “Reverse torque of 30 Ncm applied to dental implants as test for osseointegration”—a human observational study vol.2, pp.None, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-016-0060-4
  14. Influence of Implant Surface Coated with pH Buffering Agent on Early Osseointegration vol.11, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5856/jkds.2018.11.1.5
  15. Bone-Healing Pattern on the Surface of Titanium Implants at Cortical and Marrow Compartments in Two Topographic Sites: an Experimental Study in Rabbits vol.12, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010085