Change of Plantar Fascia Thickness in Hemiplegic Patients

편마비 환자에서 족저근막의 두께 변화

  • Park, Ji-Won (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health Science, University of Daegu Catholic) ;
  • Park, Sung-Hee (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Institute for Medical Science, and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Ko, Myoung-Hwan (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Institute for Medical Science, and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
  • 박지원 (대구가톨릭대학교 보건과학대학 물리치료학과) ;
  • 박성희 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 재활의학교실, 의과학 연구소 및 임상의학 연구소) ;
  • 고명환 (전북대학교 의학전문대학원 재활의학교실, 의과학 연구소 및 임상의학 연구소)
  • Received : 2009.07.04
  • Accepted : 2009.09.11
  • Published : 2009.09.25

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the change in plantar fascia thickness in hemiplegic and non-hemiplegic feet in stroke patients using an ultrasonographic evaluation. Methods: Sixteen hemiplegic and non-hemiplegic feet from 16 hemiplegic patients (patient group) and 16 feet from 8 healthy subjects (control group) were evaluated by ultrasonography. The sagittal sonograms were obtained in the prone position, and the plantar fascia thickness was measured at its insertion into the calcaneus. Results: The mean plantar fascia thickness was measured to be $4.5\pm0.8$mm in hemiplegic feet of the patient group, $3.4\pm1.0$mm for the contralateral non-hemiplegic feet and $2.8\pm0.3$mm for the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in plantar fascia between the hemiplegic feet and contralateral non-hemiplegic feet as well as between the contralateral non-hemiplegic feet and control group (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively). The plantar fascia thickness according to the Brunnstrom stage and modified Ashworth scale was increased significantly in the hemiplegic feet (p<0.01). Conclusion: These results show that the plantar fascia is overloaded in the hemiplegic and non-hemiplegic feet of stroke patients. A therapeutic approach should be considered for these patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Perry J. Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. New Jersey, SLACK Inc, 1992:73-8.
  2. Hicks JH. The mechanics of the foot. II. The plantar aponeurosis and the arch. J Anat. 1954;88(1):25-30.
  3. Hicks JH. The foot as a support. Acta Anat (Basel). 1955;25(1):34-45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000141055
  4. D'Ambrogi E, Giacomozzi C, Macellari V et al. Abnormal foot function in diabetic patients: the altered onset of Windlass mechanism. Diabet Med. 2005;22(12):1713-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01699.x
  5. D'Ambrogi E, Giurato L, D'Agostino MA et al. Contribution of plantar fascia to the increased forefoot presures in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(5):1525-9. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.5.1525
  6. Giacomozzi C, D'Ambrogi E, Uccioli L et al. Does the thickening of achilles tendon and plantar fascia contribute to the alteration of diabetic foot loading? Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2005;20(5):532-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.01.011
  7. Koh EK, Jung DY. A review of biomechanical treatments for the diabetic foot. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2007;19(5):51-63.
  8. Wall JC, Turnbull GI. Gait asymmetries in residual hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986;67(8):550-3.
  9. Henriksson-Larsen K, Wretling ML, Lorentzon R et al. Do muscle fibre size and fibre angulation correlate in pennated human muscles? Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1992;64(1):68-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00376443
  10. Kawakami Y, Abe T, Fukunaga T. Muscle-fiber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. J Appl Phsyiol. 1993;74(6):2740-4.
  11. Kuno S, Fukunaga T. Measurement of muscle fibre displacement during contraction by real-time ultrasonography in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;70(1):45-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00601807
  12. Cardinal E, Chhem RK, Beauregard CG et al. Plantar fasciitis: sonographic evaluation. Radiology. 1996;201(1):257-9.
  13. Seo SK. The analysis of ultrasonography on gastrocnemius medialis of patient with stroke. J Kor Soc Phys Ther. 2007;19(2):11-9.
  14. Wearing SC, Smeathers JE, Sullivan PM et al. Plantar fasciitis: are pain and fascial thickness associated with arch shape and loading? Phy Ther. 2007;87(8):1002-8. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20060136
  15. Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: Based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966;46(4):357-75.
  16. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987;67(2):206-7.
  17. Uzel M, Cetinus E, Ekerbicer HC et al. The influence of athletic activity on the plantar fascia in healthy young adults. J Clin Ultrasound. 2006;34(1):17-21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.20178
  18. Bransdstater ME, de Bruin H, Glowland C et al. Hemiplegic gait: analysis of temporal variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64(12):583-7.
  19. Perry J. The mechanics of walking in hemiplegia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1969;63:23-31.
  20. Peat M, Dubo HI, Winter D. Electromyographic temporal analysis of gait: hemiplegic locomotion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1976;57(9):421-5.
  21. Hong DJ, Park SB, Lee SG et al. Analysis of the stance phase in a hemiplegic patient by the measurement of plantar pressure. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 1998;22(5):1123-8.
  22. Snider MP, Clancy WG, McBeath AA. Plantar fascia release for chronic plantar fasciitis in runners. Am J Sports Med. 1983;11(4):215-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658301100406
  23. Erdemir A, Hamel AJ, Fauth AR et al. Dynamic loading of the plantar aponeurosis in walking. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A(3):546-52.
  24. Kwong PK, Kay D, Voner PT et al. Plantar fasciitis. Mechanics and pathomechanics of treatment. Clin Sports Med. 1988;7(1):119-26.
  25. Bolgla LA, Malone TR. Plantar fasciitis and the windlass mechanism: a biomechanical link to clinical practice. J Athl Train. 2004;39(1):77-82.
  26. Riddle DL, Pulisic M, Pidcoe P et al. Risk factors for plantar fasciitis: a matched case-control study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(5):872-7.
  27. Schepsis AA, Leach RE, Gorzyca J. Plantar fasciitis. Etiology, treatment, surgical results and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;(266):185-96.
  28. Yoon KS, Kim SB, Park JS. Ultrasonographic findings in plantar fasciitis. J Korean Acad Rehab Med. 2002;26(2): 181-6.