A Study on the Effects of the Institutional Pressure on the Process of Implementation and Appropriation of System: M-EMRS in Hospital Organization

시스템의 도입과 전유 과정에 영향을 미치는 제도적 압력에 관한 연구: 병원조직의 모바일 전자의무기록 시스템을 대상으로

  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

Increasingly the institutional theory has been an important theoretical view of decision making process and IT adoption in many academic researches. This study used the institutional theory as a lens through which we can understand the factors that enable the effective appropriation of advanced information technology. It posits that mimetic, coercive, and normative pressures existing in an institutionalized environment could influence the participation of top managers or decision makers and the involvement of users toward an effective use of IT in their tasks. Since the introduction of IT, organizational members have been using IT in their daily tasks, creating and recreating rules and resources according to their own methods and needs. That is to say, the adaptation process of the IT and outcomes are different among organizations. The previous studies on a diverse use of IT refer to the appropriation of technology from the social technology view. Users appropriate IT through not only technology itself, but also in terms of how they use it or how they make the social practice in their use of it. In this study, the concepts of institutional pressure, appropriation, participation of decision makers, and involvement of users toward the appropriation are explored in the context of the appropriation of the mobile electronic medical record system (M-EMRS) in particularly a hospital setting. Based on the conceptual definition of institutional pressure, participation and involvement, operational measures are reconstructed. Furthermore, the concept of appropriation is measured in the aspect of three sub-constructs-consensus on appropriation, faithful appropriation, and attitude of use. Grounded in the relevant theories to appropriation of IT, we developed a research framework in which the effects of institutional pressure, participation and involvement on the appropriation of IT are analyzed. Within this theoretical framework, we formulated several hypotheses. We developed a second order institutional pressure and appropriation construct. After establishing its validity and reliability, we tested the hypotheses with empirical data from 101 users in 3 hospitals which had adopted and used the M-EMRS. We examined the mediating effect of the participation of decision makers and the involvement of users on the appropriation and empirically validated their relationships. The results show that the mimetic, coercive, and normative institutional pressure has an effect on the participation of decision makers and the involvement of users in the appropriation of IT while the participation of decision makers and the involvement of users have an effect on the appropriation of IT. The results also suggest that the institutional pressure and the participation of decision makers influence the involvement of users toward an appropriation of IT. Our results emphasize the mediating effect of the institutional pressure on the appropriation of IT. Namely, the higher degree of the participation of decision makers and the involvement of users, the more effective appropriation users will represent. These results provide strong support for institutional-based variables as predictors of appropriation. These findings also indicate that organizations should focus on the role of participation of decision makers and the involvement of users for the purpose of effective appropriation, and these are the practical implications of our study. The theoretical contribution of this study is lies in the integrated model of the effect of institutional pressure on the appropriation of IT. The results are consistent with the institutional theory and support previous studies on adaptive structuration theory.

Keywords

References

  1. Armstrong, C., and Sambamurthy, V. 'Information Technology Assimilation in Firms : The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1999, pp. 304-327 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.304
  2. Barclay, D., C. Higgins, and R. Thompson, 'The Partial Least Squares [PLS] Approach to Causal Modeling, Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration,' Technology Studies, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1995, pp. 285-309
  3. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J., 'Rethinking the Concept of User Involvement,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1989, pp. 53-63 https://doi.org/10.2307/248700
  4. Barki, H. and Hartwick, J., 'Measuring User Participation, User Involvement, and User Attitude,' MIS Quarterly, vol. 18, No. 1, 1994, pp. 59-79 https://doi.org/10.2307/249610
  5. Burt, R.S., 'Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion Versus Structural Equivalence,' American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 92, No. 6, 1987, pp. 1287-1335 https://doi.org/10.1086/228667
  6. Chin, A. Gopal, W. D. Salisbury., 'Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1997, pp. 342-367 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.4.342
  7. Chin, W., Salisbury, D., Gopa, A., and R. Newsted, 'Research Report: Better Theory Through Measurement-Developing a Scale to Capture Consensus on Appropriation,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No. 1, 2002, pp. 91-103 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.1.91.93
  8. DeSanctis, G., M.S. Poole., 'Capturing the complexity of advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory,' Organizational Science, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1994, pp. 121-147 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.2.121
  9. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., Belief, Attitude, Intentions and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, 1975
  10. Flanagin, A.J., 'Social Pressures on Organizational Website Adoption,' Human Communications Research, Vol. 26, No. 4, 2000, pp. 618-646 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00771.x
  11. Gosain, S., 'Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New lron Cage?,' Journal of the Association of Information Systems Vol. 5, No. 4, 2004, pp. 151-182
  12. Haveman, H.A., 'Follow the Leader: Mimetic Isomorphism and Entry into New Markets,' Administrative Scíence Quarterly, Vol. 38, 1993, pp. 593-627 https://doi.org/10.2307/2393338
  13. Hu, Q., Hart, P., and Cooke, D. The Role of External Influences on Organizational Information Security Practices: An Institutional Perspective, paper presented at the 39th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science, Kauai, Hawaii, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2006.481
  14. Hu, Q., and Quan, J., 'The Institutionalization of IT Budgeting: Evidence from the Financial Sector,' Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2006, pp. 84-97 https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2006010105
  15. Ives, B. and Olson, M.H., 'User Involvement and MIS Success: A Review of Research,' Management Science Vol. 30, No. 5, pp. 586-603 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.5.586
  16. Lee, A.S., 'Electronic mail as a medium for richcommunication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation,' Management Information Systems Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1994, pp. 143-157 https://doi.org/10.2307/249762
  17. Leonard-Barton, D., 'Implementation as Mutual Adaptation of Technology and Organization,' Research Policy, Vol. 17, 1988, pp. 251-267 https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6
  18. Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q. and Xue, Y., 'Assirnilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2007, pp. 59-87
  19. Meyer, J.W., B. Rowan., 'Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony,' The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83, No. 2, 1991, pp. 340-363 https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  20. Mizruchi, M., and Fein, L., 'The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 44, 1999, pp. 653-683 https://doi.org/10.2307/2667051
  21. Newell, S., Swan, J., and Galliers, R., 'A Knowledge-Focused Perspective on the Diffusion and Adoption of Complex Information Technologies: The BPR Example,' Information Systems Journal, Vol. 10, 2000, pp. 239-259 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.2000.00079.x
  22. Orlikowski, W.J., 'The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations,' Organization Science, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1992, pp. 398-427 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398
  23. Orlikowski, W.J., and Gash, D.C., 'Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organizations,' ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol. 2, No. 2, 1994, pp. 174-207 https://doi.org/10.1145/196734.196745
  24. Park, C.S., Kim, J.S., and Im, K.S., 'The Impact of Comprehensive Decision-Making of Information Technology Investment on Firm Performance,' Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2005, pp. 163-186
  25. Powell and P.J. DiMaggio, (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, 1994
  26. Purvis, R.L., Sambamurthy, v., and Zmud, R.W., 'The Assirnilation of Knowledge Platforms in Organizations: An Empirical Investigation,' Organization Science, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2001, pp. 117-135 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.117.10115
  27. Poole, M.S., and G. DeSanctis., 'Microlevel structuration in computer-supported group decision making,' Human Communication Research. Vol. 19, No. 1, 1992, pp. 5-49 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00294.x
  28. Powell, W.W., and DiMaggio, P.J., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991
  29. Ryan, S.D. and M.S. Gates, 'Inclusion of Social Subsystem Issues in IT Investment Decisions: An Empirical Assessment,' Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, Jan-Mar., 2004, pp. 1-18 https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2004010101
  30. Scott, W.R., 'The Adolescence of Institutional Theory,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1987, pp. 493-511 https://doi.org/10.2307/2392880
  31. Staw, B.M., and Epstein, L.D., 'What Bandwagons Bring-Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Reputation and CEO Pay,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2000, pp. 523-556 https://doi.org/10.2307/2667108
  32. 5taw, B.M., and Epstein, L.D., 'What Bandwagons Bring-Effects of Popular Management Techniques on Corporate Performance, Reputation and CEO Pay,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2000, pp. 523-556 https://doi.org/10.2307/2667108
  33. Swan, J., Newell, S., and Robertson, M., 'The Illusion of 'Best Practice' in Information Systems for 야erations Management,' European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 8, 1999, pp. 284-293 https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000336
  34. Teo, H.H., Wei, K.K., and Benbasat, I., 'Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2003, pp. 19-49
  35. Yoo, Y.J. and M. Alavi, 'Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 5, 2001, pp. 371-390
  36. Zanna, M.P. and Rempel, J.K., 'Attitude: A New Look at an Old Concept,' in The Social Psychology of Knowledge, D. Bar-Tal and A. Kruglanski (eds.), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY., 1988