기러기가족의 초국적 적응전략 및 가족 경로

Transnational Life of Korean 'Wild Geese Family': Coping Strategies and Family Paths Across Time

  • 강유진 (한세대학교 사회복지학과)
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30

초록

My concern was to explore how the Korean 'wild geese families' functioned to maintain 'familyhood' in spite of spatial separation by using a qualitative approach. I used personal narratives from eleven 'geese mothers' living in the United States. Family paths across time were analyzed to understand their complicated nature. Respondents adopted some coping strategies to obtain the flexibility and the stability for relocating their transnational lives. These were 1) communications, 2) relocation of household work, and 3) reinterpretation of 'sacrifice.' It seemed that their family paths become either the continuous type (prolong their stay) or the discontinuous type (not prolong their stay). These were shaped by complex individual, familial, and social forces which affected differently according to the steps of family life cycles. Therefore, this study showed that the Korean 'wild geese family' did not move toward the uni-direction with the same experiences and nature. More importantly, it is noteworthy to acknowledge that the prevalence of 'wild geese family' reveals the dynamic interactive nature of the family, i.e., actively responding to the changes and challenges from the diverse circumstances. It is inferred that the social and cultural factors such as the class mobility, the education system, and the values may influence the family life style.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김선미(2007) 재미 국제 장기 분거가족 전업주부의 일상적 삶과 정체성 유지에 관한 연구: '기러기 엄마' 되기 과정. 한국가족자원경영학회지 11 (4), 171-189.
  2. 김양희.장은정(2004) 장기 분거 가족에 관한 탐색적 연구. 한국가족관계학회지 9(2), 1-23.
  3. 김양희.최명선.이지항(2005) 뉴질랜드 거주 기러기 어머니의 생활실태 연구. 대한가정학회지 43(11), 142-152.
  4. 김의철.박영신(2008) 한국 사회와 교육적 성취(II): 한국 청소년의 학업성취에 대한 심리적 토대 분석. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제 14(1), 63-109.
  5. 김흥주(2001) 조기유학(유학이민)의 현황 및 국민의식 분석. 2001년도 KEDI 제 1차 교육정책 포럼. 서울: 한국교육개발원, 25-30.
  6. 김흥원(2005) 조기유학에 관한 국민의식과 실태. 2005년도 KEDI 제 26차 교육정책 포럼. 서울: 한국교육개발원, 35-36.
  7. 데보라 K 패짓.유태균 역(1998) 사회복지질적방법론. 서울: 나남출판, 150-162.
  8. 박영신.김의철.탁수연(2002) 청소년과 부모의 실패와 미래성취 의식을 통해 본 한국인의 성취관련 토착심리. 한국심리학회지: 사회문제 11(2), 75-110.
  9. 오욱환(2008) 조기유학, 유토피아를 향한 출국-조기유학의 복합적 기능과 역기능. 서울: 교육과학사, 37-64.
  10. 이현지.남현주(2003) 청소년 유학생들의 문화적 적응과 심리적 복지에 관한 연구: 미국 유학생들을 중심으로. 청소년학연구 10(4), 121-142.
  11. 정광순(2006) 초등학생의 유학경험에 대한 내러티브 탐구. 교육인류학연구 9(2), 117-139.
  12. 조 은(2004) 세계화의 최첨단에 선 한국의 가족-신 글로벌 모자녀 가족사례연구. 경제와 사회 64, 148-171.
  13. 조혜영.최원기.이경상.Nancy Abelmann(2007) 청소년들은 어떻게 조기유학을 결정하게 되는가?: 미국 소도시 유학생들의 사례. 청소년학연구 14(4), 115-143.
  14. 최양숙(2006) 부부분거경험의 성별차이를 중심으로 본 기러기가족 현상. 가족과 문화 18(2). 37-65.
  15. 최양숙(2008) 자녀의 조기유학으로 인한 분거가족에 서 나타나는 사회심리적 기제. 한국가족관계학회지 13(3), 67-97.
  16. Baldassar L(2007) Transnationa families and the provision of moral and emotional support: the relationship between truth and distance. Global Studies in Culture and Power 14, 385-409.
  17. Boyd M(1996) The sociology of migration. Cheltenham: Brookfield 297-328.
  18. Bryceson D, Vuorela U(2002) The transnational family: new European frontiers and global networks. NY: Berg, 3-30.
  19. Da WW(2003) Gender relations in recent Chinese migration to Australia. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 12(3), 361-384.
  20. Dreby J(2006) Honor and virtue: Mexican parenting in the transnational context. Gender and Society 20, 32-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243205282660
  21. Falicov CJ(2005) Emotional transnationalism and family identities. Family Process 44, 399-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00068.x
  22. Falicov CJ(2007) Working with transnational immigrants: expanding meanings of family, community, and culture. Family Process 46, 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00201.x
  23. Huang S, Yeoh BSA(2005) Transnational families and their children's education: China's 'study mothers's in Singapore. Global Networks 5(4), 379-400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00125.x
  24. Landolt P. Da WW(2005) The spatially ruptured practices of migrant families: a comparison of immigrants from El Salvador and the People's Republic of China. Current Sociology 53(4), 625-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392105052719
  25. Lee YJ, Koo H(2006) Wild geese fathers' and a globalised family strategy for education in Korea, IDPR 28(4), 533-553.
  26. New York Times(2008) 'For English studies, Koreans say good bye to dad', 8 June.
  27. Park SJ, Abelmann N(2004). Class and cosmopolitan striving: mother's management of English education in South Korea. Anthropological Quarterly 77(4), 645-672. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2004.0063
  28. Parrenas R(2005) Long distance intimacy: class, gender and intergenerational relations between mothers and children in Fillipono transnational families. Global Networks 5(4), 317-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00122.x
  29. Ryan L(2004) Family matters:(e)migration, familial networks and Irish women in Britan. The editorial board of The Sociological Review, 351-369.
  30. Schmalzbauer L(2008) Family divided: the class formation of Honduran transnational families. Global Networks 8(3), 329-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2008.00198.x
  31. Şenyurekli AR, Detzner DF(2008) Intergenerational relationships in a transnational context: the case of Turkish families. Family Relations 57(4), 457-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00514.x
  32. Sorensen NN(2005) Transnational family life across the Atlantic: the experience of Colombian and Dominican migrants in Europe. Paper to be presented at the International Conference on 'migration and domestic work in a global perspective', Wassenar: The Netherlands.
  33. Waters JL(2002) Flexible families? 'astronaut' houesholds and the experiences of lone mothers in Vancouver, British Columbia. Social and Cultural Geography 3(2), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360220133907
  34. Yeoh BSA, Huang S, Lam T(2005) Transnationalizing the 'Asian' family: imaginaries, intimacies and strategic intents. Global Networks 5, 307-315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2005.00121.x