A Comparative Study on Food Behavior with Self-Evaluation of Dietary Life for Korean Adults

한국성인의 식품소비행동과 식생활 자기평가에 관한 비교연구

  • Park, Jae-Hong (Dept. of Food and Resource Economics, Yeungnam University) ;
  • You, So-Ye (Devision of Business Administration, Chonbuk National University)
  • 박재홍 (영남대학교 식품자원경제학과) ;
  • 유소이 (전북대학교 경영학부)
  • Published : 2009.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore socio-economic factors as determinants of food behavior and self-evaluation on meeting dietary guidelines. The data were derived from the KNHANES collected in 2007. A multidimensional framework of the determinants of food behavior was used, including age, gender, region, occupation, education, income and nutritional knowledge. The determinants of food behavior and self-evaluation were estimated by ordered logistic regression models. Food behavior was measured by dietary diversity scores including six food groups, which were cereals, vegetables, meats, fruits, milk, and oils. Self-evaluation on meeting dietary guidelines was based on responses from questionnaires for implementing Korean dietary guidelines. In general, the respondents who fulfilled all criteria were few. There were some differences between dietary diversity scores and self-evaluation on meeting dietary guidelines. Age, gender, and educational level showed effect on food behavior and self-evaluation. For dietary diversity scores, the individuals who were younger male, graduated from college were more likely to consume more various foods. The individuals who were older female, graduated from high school were more likely to meet dietary guidelines. Occupation was associated only with self-evaluation. Age and gender were associated with food behavior as well as self-evaluation. Income and marital status were associated only with dietary diversity scores. Reading food label and occupation were associated only with self-evaluation. The food behavior of married individuals was less in line with the dietary diversity scores than singles. In conclusion the differences between objective measure and subjective measure on individuals' diet showed more efforts like segmented nutritional education would be needed to increase the quality of dietary life.

Keywords

References

  1. 김소혜.김주영.류경아.손정민(2007) 비만성인의 영양소 섭취량 및 식사다양성 평가. 대한지역사회영양학회지 12(5), 583-591.
  2. 김연정(2004) 서울 일부 지역 중학생의 식사의 질 평가 및 청소년을 위한 The Korean Healthy Eating Index 제안. 명지대학교 대학원 석사학위 논문.
  3. 김정연.문수재(1990) 식품 섭취의 다양성과 영양소 섭취 수준과의 관련성에 대한 생태학적 분석.한국영양학회지 23(5), 309-316.
  4. 문수재.양일선.이민준.차진아(1991) 세계 각국의 식품소비구조, 영양소 섭취수준 및 영양문제의 변화양상에 관한 비교연구. 한국식문화학회지 6(2), 199-213.
  5. 박재홍.권오옥(2007) 건강기능식품의 소비행위연구. 식품유통연구 24(3), 43-57.
  6. 백희영.김초일.문현경.윤진숙.정효지.심재은. 정현주(2008) 2008 한국 성인을 위한 식생활목표와 식생활지침. 한국영양학회지 41(8), 887- 899.
  7. 보건복지가족부.질병관리본부(2009) 국민건강영양조사 제4기 1차년도 원시자료.
  8. 손경희 (1988) 도시 주부의 식품 소비 구조 변화와 미래의 식생활 향상을 위한 연구. 대한가정학회지 26(4), 53-65.
  9. 손은정.문현경(2004) 일부 초등학교 급식 식단의 평가(1): 구성식품의 다양성과 영양소 공급량. 대한 영양사협회 학술지 10(1), 47-57.
  10. 유소이(2005) 도시가계의 식품소비 다양성에 관한 연구. 소비문화연구 8(2), 29-42.
  11. 정진은.이정숙(2005) 한국성인과 미국성인의 영양 섭취 실태 비교 연구. 한국영양학회지 38(10), 856-863.
  12. 주혜진.김초강(1996) 가족 건강관리 행위에 관한 조사연구. 한국보건교육학회지 13(1), 1-25.
  13. 최미경.이주연.이원영.박정덕(2005) 성인의 일상적인 식사섭취의 지역별 비교평가. 대한 영양사협회 학술지 11(3), 209-319.
  14. 최지현.이계임(1996) 식품 소비구조 분석-1984, 1993년 횡단면자료를 이용하여, 농촌경제, 19(1), (www.krei.re.kr).
  15. 홍소영.이계희.이홍수.이명숙.지선하.정효지(2007) 한국 성인의 식생활 지침 실천도와 이상 지혈증의 관련성. 한국영양학회지 40(8), 745-752.
  16. Feskanich D, Rockett H, Colditz GA(2004) Modifying the healthy eating index to assess diet quality in children, and adolescents. Journal of American dietetic association 104, 1375-1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2004.06.020
  17. Green WH(1990) Econometric Analysis. New York: MaCmillan publishing company. 703-704.
  18. Hupkens CLH, Knibbe RA, Drop MJ(2000) Social class differences in food consumption. European Journal of Public Health 10, 108-113. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/10.2.108
  19. Istvan S, Emese K, Beata K, Andrea L(2008) Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance-A review. Appetite 51, 456–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2008.05.060
  20. Lahsaeizadeh A(2001) Sociological analysis of food nutrition in Iran, Nutrition & Food Science 31(3), 129-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/00346650110385837
  21. Lund PJ, Derry BJ(1985) Household food consumption: the influence of household characteristics. Journal of Agricultural Economics 36, 41-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1985.tb00155.x
  22. Marianne BM, van den Bree, Przybeck TR, Cloninger CR(2006) Diet and personality: Associations in a population-based sample. Appetite 46, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.12.004
  23. Moorman C(2002) Consumer health under scope. Journal of Consumer Research 29, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.1086/339928
  24. Pick ME, Edwards M, Moreau D, Ryan EA(2005) Assessment of diet quality in pregnant women using the healthy eating index. Journal of the American Dietetic Association 105(2), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2004.11.028
  25. Roos E, Lahelma E, Virtanen M, Prattala R, Pietinen P(1998) Gender, socioeconomic status and family status as determinants of food behavior. Social Science & Medicine 46(12), 1519-1529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00032-X
  26. Rozin P, Fischler C, Imada S, Sarubin A, Wrzesniewski A(1999) Attitude to food and the role of food in life in the USA, Japan, Flemish Belgium and France: Possible implications for the diet-health debate. Appetite 33, 163-180. https://doi.org/10.1006/appe.1999.0244
  27. Singh-Manoux A, Marmot M(2005) Role of socialization in explaining social inequilities in health, Social Science & Medicine 60, 2129-2133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.070
  28. Thiele S, Weiss C(2003) Consumer demand for food diversity: Evidence for Germany. Food Policy 28, 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-9192(02)00068-4
  29. Verbeke W, Ward RW, Viaene J(2000) Probit analysis of fresh meat consumption in Belgium: exploring BSE and television communication impact. Agribusiness 6(2), 215-234.