DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Experimental and Numerical Study on the Characteristics of Devolatilization Process for Coals Utilized in Korea Using CPD Model

CPD 모델을 이용한 국내수입탄 성상에 따른 탈휘발 특성에 관한 실험 및 해석적 연구

  • 김량균 (부산대학교 대학원 기계공학부) ;
  • 이병화 (부산대학교 대학원 기계공학부) ;
  • 전충환 (부산대학교 기계공학부 화력발전에너지분석기술센터) ;
  • 송주헌 (부산대학교 기계공학부 화력발전에너지분석기술센터) ;
  • 장영준 (부산대학교 기계공학부 화력발전에너지분석기술센터) ;
  • Published : 2009.08.01

Abstract

Coal is the energy resource which is important with the new remarking energy resource. Coal combustion produces more NOx per unit of energy than any other major combustion technology. Pollutant emission associated with coal combustion will have a huge impact on the environment. Coal conversion has three processes which are drying, coal devolatilization and char oxidation. Coal devolatilization process is important because it has been shown that HCN which is converted from volatile N contributes 60 to 80% of the total NOx produced. This paper addresses mass release behavior of char, tar, gas and HCN in an experiment of Laminar Flow Reactor with two coals such as Roto middle coal (Sub-bituminous) and Anglo coal (Bituminous). The experiment is compared with the data predicted by CPD model for mass release of HCN about Roto south, Indominco, Weris creek and China orch coals. The results show that HCN increases as a function of decreasing the ratio of fixed carbon(FC)/ volatile matter(VM of the coals contain.)

Keywords

References

  1. Zhong BJ, Shi WW, Fu WB.,2002, 'Effects of Fuel Characteristics on the NO Reduction During the Reburning with Coals,' Fuel Process Technol, Vol. 79, pp. 93~106 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(02)00102-9
  2. Smoot LD, Hill SC, Xu H., 1998, '$NO_x$ Control Through Coal Reburning,' Prog Energy Combust Sci Vol.24, pp. 385~408 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(97)00022-1
  3. Benson SA, Laumb JD, Crocker CR, Pavlish JH., 2005, 'SCR Catalyst Performance in Flue Gases Derived from Subbituminous and Lignite Coals,' Fuel Process Technol, Vol. 86, pp. 577~613 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.07.004
  4. Li S, Xu TM, Zhou QL, Tan HZ, Hui SE, Hu HL., 2007, 'Optimization of Coal Reburning in a 1MW Tangentially Fired Furnace,' Fue,l Vol. 86, pp. 1169~75 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2006.09.020
  5. EPA., 1996, 'Alternative Control Technologies Document,' US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-453/R-94-023, pp. 20~2
  6. Oland CB., 2002, 'Guide to Low-Emission Boiler and Combustion Equipment Selection,' Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/TM, p. 19
  7. EPA., 1992, 'Summary of NOx Control Technologies and Their Availability and Extent of Application,' US Environmental Protection Agency, EPA-450/3-92-004, pp. 8~12
  8. R. Kurose, H. Tsuji, H. Makino, 2001, 'Effects of Moisture in Coal on Pulverized Coal Combustion Characteristics,' Fuel, Vol. 80, pp. 1457~1465 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00019-9
  9. R. D. Boardman, L. Douglas Smoot, A. U. Blackham, W. C. Hecker, K. A. Solen, 1990, 'Development and Evaluation of a Combined Thermal and Fuel Nitric Oxide Predictive Model,' Brigham Yong University, Ph. D. Dessertation
  10. Wendt, J.O.L, 1980, 'Fundamental Coal Combustion Mechamisms and Pollutant Formation in Furnces,' Prog. Emergy Combust. Sci., Vol. 6, pp. 201~222 https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(80)90007-6
  11. L. Douglas Smoot, Philip J. Smith, 1985, 'Coal Combustion and Gasification,' Plenum, New York, NY
  12. Levy. J.M., Phol J. H., Sarofim, A. F, Song Y. H., 1978, 'Combustion Research on the Fate of Fuel Nitrogen Under Conditions of Pulverized Coal Combustion,' EPA report no. PB 286 208, US Environmental Reasearch Agency, Washingon, D. C.
  13. S. C. Hill, L. Douglas Smoot, 2000, 'Modeling of Nitrogen Oxides Formation and Destruction in Combustion Systems,' Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., Vol. 26, pp. 417~458 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1285(00)00011-3
  14. DeSoete GG., 1975, Fifteenth Symposium (international) on Combution, The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, pp.1093
  15. Fletcher, T. H., A. R. Kerstein, R. J. Pugmire, M. S. Solum, and D. M. Grant, 1992, 'Chemical Percolation Model for Devolatilization: 3. Chemical Structure as a Function of Coal Type,' Energy and Fuels, Vol. 6, pp. 414~431 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00034a011
  16. Dominic Genetti, T. H. Fletchere, and R. J. Pugmire, 1987, 'Development and Application of a Correlation of 13-C NMR chemical Structural Analyses Coal Based on Elemental Composition and Volatile Matter Content,' Energy and Fuels, Vol. 13, pp. 60~68 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef980074k
  17. Grant, D. M., R. J. Pugmire, T. H. Fletcher, and A. R. Kerstein, 1989, 'Chemical Model of Coal Devolatilization Using Percolation Lattice Statistics,' Energy and Fuels, Vol. 3, pp. 175~186 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00014a011
  18. Fletcher, T. H., A. R. Kerstein, R. J. Pugmire, M. S. Solum, and D. M. Grant, 1990, 'Chemical Percolation Model for Devolatilization: 2. Temperature and Heating Rate Effects on Product Yields,' Energy and Fuels, Vol. 4, pp. 54~60 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00019a010
  19. Michael A. Serio, David G. Hamblen, James R. Markham, and Peter R. Solomon, 1987, 'Kinetics of Volatile Product Evolution in Coal Pyrolysis: Experiment and Theory,' Energy and Fuels, Vol. 1, pp. 138 ~ 152 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef00002a002
  20. Chen, J. C., 1991, 'Effect of Secondary Reactions on Product Distribution and Nitrogen Evolution from Rapid Coal Pyrolysis,' Stanford University, HTGL Report No. T-280
  21. Steven T. Perry, Thomas H. Fletcher, 1999, 'A Global Free-Radical Mechanism for Nitrogen Release During Coal Devolatilization Based on Chemical Structure,' Brigham Yong University, Ph. D. Dessertation
  22. Jinliang Ma, Thomas H. Fletcher, 1996, 'Soot Formation During Coal Pyrolysis,' Brigham Yong University, Ph. D. Dessertation
  23. Haifeng Zhang, Thomas H. Fletcher, 2001, 'Nitrogen Evolution and Soot Formatin during Secondary Coal Pyrolysis,' Brigham Yong University, Ph. D. Dessertation
  24. Haifeng Zhang, Thomas H. Fletcher, 2001, 'Nitrogen Transformations during Secondary Coal Pyrolysis,' Energy and Fuels, Vol. 15, pp. 1512~1522 https://doi.org/10.1021/ef010118g

Cited by

  1. A Theoretical Analysis on Volatile Matter Release from Different Coals Using CPD Model During a Coal Gasification vol.33, pp.12, 2009, https://doi.org/10.3795/KSME-B.2009.33.12.1000