DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of uniform and spatially varying ground motion effects on the stochastic response of fluid-structure interaction systems

  • Bilici, Yasemin (Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering) ;
  • Bayraktar, Alemdar (Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering) ;
  • Adanur, Suleyman (Karadeniz Technical University, Department of Civil Engineering)
  • Received : 2007.12.25
  • Accepted : 2009.09.11
  • Published : 2009.11.10

Abstract

The effects of the uniform and spatially varying ground motions on the stochastic response of fluid-structure interaction system during an earthquake are investigated by using the displacement based fluid finite elements in this paper. For this purpose, variable-number-nodes two-dimensional fluid finite elements based on the Lagrangian approach is programmed in FORTRAN language and incorporated into a general-purpose computer program SVEM, which is used for stochastic dynamic analysis of solid systems under spatially varying earthquake ground motion. The spatially varying earthquake ground motion model includes wave-passage, incoherence and site-response effects. The effect of the wave-passage is considered by using various wave velocities. The incoherence effect is examined by considering the Harichandran-Vanmarcke and Luco-Wong coherency models. Homogeneous medium and firm soil types are selected for considering the site-response effect where the foundation supports are constructed. A concrete gravity dam is selected for numerical example. The S16E component recorded at Pacoima dam during the San Fernando Earthquake in 1971 is used as a ground motion. Three different analysis cases are considered for spatially varying ground motion. Displacements, stresses and hydrodynamic pressures occurring on the upstream face of the dam are calculated for each case and compare with those of uniform ground motion. It is concluded that spatially varying earthquake ground motions have important effects on the stochastic response of fluid-structure interaction systems.

Keywords

References

  1. Araujo, J.M. and Awruch, A.M. (1998), "Probabilistic finite element analysis of concrete gravity dams", Adv. Eng. Software, 29, 97-104 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00052-0
  2. Bathe, K.J. (1982), Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ
  3. Bayraktar, A. and Dumano lu, A.A. (1998), "The effect of the asynchronous ground motion on hydrodynamic pressures", Comput. Struct., 68, 271-282 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(98)00023-6
  4. Bayraktar, A. and Hançer, E. (2005), "Stochastic analysis of fluid-structure interaction systems by Lagrangian approach", Struct. Eng. Mech., 20(4), 389-403 https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.20.4.389
  5. Bayraktar, A., Dumano lu, A.A. and Calay r, Y. (1996), "Asynchronous dynamic analysis of dam-reservoirfoundation systems by the Lagrangian approach", Comput. Struct., 58(5), 925-935 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00211-X
  6. Bayraktar, A., Hançer, E. and Akköse, M. (2005), "Influence of base-rock characteristics on the stochastic dynamic response of dam-reservoir-foundation systems", Eng. Struct., 27(10), 1498-1508 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.004
  7. Bayraktar, A., Hançer, E. and Dumano lu, A. (2005), "Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic responses of gravity dam-reservoir systems using fluid finite elements", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 4, 1365-1376
  8. Bilici, Y., Bayraktar, A., Soyluk, K., Hacýefendio lu, K., Ate , . and Adanur, S. (2009), "Stochastic dynamic response of dam-reservoir-foundation systems to spatially varying earthquake ground motions", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 29, 444-458 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.05.001
  9. Calay r, Y. and Dumano lu, A.A. (1993), "Static and dynamic analysis of fluid and fluid-structure systems by the Lagrangian method", Comput. Struct., 49(4), 625-632 https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(93)90067-N
  10. Chen, M.T. and Harichandran, R.S. (2001), "Response of an earth dam to spatially varying earthquake ground motion", J. Eng. Mech., 127(9), 932-939 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:9(932)
  11. Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1975), Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Singapore
  12. Clough, R.W. and Penzien, J. (1993), Dynamics of Structures. 2nd ed. Singapore: McGraw Hill, Inc
  13. Der Kiureghian, A. (1996), "A coherency model for spatially varying ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 25, 99-111 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199601)25:1<99::AID-EQE540>3.0.CO;2-C
  14. Der Kiureghian, A. and Neuenhofer, A. (1992), "Response spectrum method for multi-support seismic excitations", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21(8), 713-740 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210805
  15. Dumano lu, A.A. and Soyluk, K. (2002), "SVEM: A stochastic structural analysis program for the spatially varying earthquake motions", Manual, Report No. TDV/KT 023-76, University of stanbul Technique, Ýstanbul, Turkey
  16. Dumano lu, A.A. and Soyluk, K. (2003), "A stochastic analysis of long span structures subjected to spatially varying ground motions including site-response effect", Eng. Struct., 25, 1301-1310 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00080-4
  17. Hac efendio lu, K. (2006), "Transient stochastic analysis of nonlinear response of earth and rock fill dams to spatially varying ground motion", Struct. Eng. Mech., 22(6)
  18. Hall, J.F. and Chopra, A.K. (1982), "Hydrodynamic effects in the dynamic response of concrete gravity dams", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 10, 333-345 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290100212
  19. Hall, J.F. and Chopra, A.K. (1983), "Dynamic analysis of arch dams including hydrodynamic effects", Comput. Struct., ASCE, 109, 149-163
  20. Hançer, E. and Bayraktar, A. (2004), "Stochastic finite element analysis of dam-reservoir-foundation systems", ARI J., 54(1), 54-59
  21. Harichandran, R.S. and Vanmarcke, E.H. (1986), "Stochastic variation of earthquake ground motion in space and time", J. Eng. Mech., 112, 154-174 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1986)112:2(154)
  22. Harichandran, R.S. and Wang, W. (1988), "Response of one- and two-span beams to spatially varying seismic excitation", In: Report to the National Science Foundation MSU-ENGR-88-002. Michigan (MI): Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, Michigan State University
  23. Harichandran, R.S., Hawwari, A. and Sweidan, B.N. (1996), "Response of long-span bridges to spatially varying ground motion", J. Struct. Eng., 122, 476-484 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:5(476)
  24. Lin, Y.K. (1967), Probabilistic Theory of Structural Dynamics. First ed., McGraw-Hill, New York
  25. Luco, J.E. and Wong, H.L. (1986), "Response of a rigid foundation to a spatially random ground motion", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 14, 891-908 https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290140606
  26. Olson, L.G. and Bathe, K.J. (1983), "A study of displacement-based fluid finite elements for calculating frequencies of fluid and fluid-structure systems", Nuclear Eng. Des., 76, 137-151 https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(83)90130-9
  27. Santa-Cruz, S., Heredia-Zavoni, E. and Harichandran, R.S. (2000), "Low-frequency behavior of coherency for strong ground motions in Mexico city and Japan", Proc. of the 12 WCEE, New Zealand, 5469-5474
  28. Santa-Cruz, S., Heredia-Zavoni, E. and Harichandran, R.S. (2000), "Low-frequency behaviour of coherency for strong ground motions in mexico city and Japan", Proc. of the 12WCEE 2000, New Zealand, 5469-5474
  29. Soyluk, K. (2004), "Comparison of random vibration methods for multi-support seismic excitation analysis of long-span bridges", Eng. Struct., 26, 1573-1583 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.016
  30. Soyluk, K., Dumano lu, A.A. and Tuna, M.E. (2004), "Random vibration and deterministic analyses of cablestayed bridges to asynchronous ground motion", Struct. Eng. Mech., 18(2), 231-246 https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2004.18.2.231
  31. Wilson, E.L. and Khalvati, M. (1983), "Finite elements for the dynamic analysis of fluid-solid systems", Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng., 19, 1657-1668 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620191105
  32. Wung, C.D. and Der Kiureghian, A. (1989), "STOCAL-II: Computer-assisted learning system for stochastic dynamic analysis of structures. Part I. Theory and development", Report No. UCB/SEMM-89/10. Berkeley, CA: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Californi
  33. Zerva, A. (1999), "Differential response spectra for the seismic response of lifelines", In: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Structural Dynamics-EURODYN 99, Prague, Czech Republic, 1999

Cited by

  1. Site-Response Effects on the Transient Stochastic Seismic Response of Concrete Dam–Reservoir–Foundation Systems by the Lagrangian Approach vol.37, pp.7, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-011-0036-x
  2. Probabilistic study of the influence of ground motion variables on response spectra vol.39, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.39.6.877
  3. Investigation of effectiveness of double concave friction pendulum bearings vol.9, pp.3, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2012.9.3.195
  4. Practical coherency model suitable for near- and far-field earthquakes based on the effect of source-to-site distance on spatial variations in ground motions vol.73, pp.6, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.73.6.651