한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제26권3호
  • /
  • Pages.238-245
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지

진도개의 행동 테스트에 의한 에소그램

Jindo Dog's Ethogram Revealed by Behavioral Test

  • Kim, Young-Ki (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Scott-S. (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Oh, Seok-Il (Korean Jindo and Domestic Animals Center) ;
  • Lee, Gye-Woong (Korean Jindo and Domestic Animals Center) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Seok (Korean Jindo and Domestic Animals Center) ;
  • Chang, Hong-Hee (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Suh, Euy-Hoon (College of Information Statistics, Gyeonsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Chun (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyo-Jong (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Yeon, Seong-Chan (Institute of Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was performed to develop ethogram of the Jindo dog's temperament categories under various conditions. A set of 12 behavioral tests were developed to investigate temperament categories expressed by the dogs. Fourty-three adult Jindo dogs(24 males, 19 females) from three different farms located in Jindo island were tested in 12 different behavioral tests. All test procedures and dog's behaviors responded to the tests were recorded using two digital video cameras and one digital still camera. A single observer reviewed all of the videotapes focused on dog's vocalization, movement, head, ears, eyes, mouth, and tail-positions. After all of the behavioral variables expressed throughout the testing period were described in detail, an ethogram of four temperament categories of 'sociability', 'aggression', 'fearfulness', and 'submission' revealed by 12 behavioral tests was developed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Beerda B, Schilder MBH, van Hooff JARAM, de Vries HW, Mol JA. Behavioural, saliva cortisol and heart rate responses to different types of stimuli in dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998; 58: 365-381 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00145-7
  2. De Palma C, Viggiano E, Barillari E, Palme R, Dufour AB, Fantini C, Natoli E. Evaluating the temperament in shelter dogs. Behaviour 2005; 142: 1307-1328 https://doi.org/10.1163/156853905774539337
  3. Diederich C, Giffroy JM. Behavioural testing in dogs: A review of methodology in search for standardisation. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006; 97: 51-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.018
  4. Goddard ME, Beilharz RG. A factor analysis of fearfulness in potential guide dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1984; 12: 253-265 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(84)90118-7
  5. Houpt K. Domestic animal behavior for veterinarians and animal scientists. 4th ed. Ames:Blackwell. 2005; 14-69
  6. Jones AC, Gosling SD. Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): A review and evaluation of past research. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005; 95: 1-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.008
  7. Jones R, Waddington D. Modification of fear in domestic chicks, Gallus gallus domesticus, via regular handling and early environmental enrichment. Anim Behav 1992; 43: 1021-1033 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(06)80015-1
  8. Kim HH, Yeon SC, Houpt KA, Lee HC, Chang HH, Lee HJ. Effects of ovariohysterectomy on reactivity in German Shepherd dogs. Vet J 2006; 172: 154-159 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2005.02.028
  9. King T, Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ. Fear of novel and startling stimuli in domestic dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003; 82: 45-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00040-6
  10. Lee CG, Lee JI, Lee CY, Sun SS. A Review of the Jindo, Korean Native Dog. Asian Australas J Anim Sci 2000; 13: 381-389
  11. Lore RK, Eisenberg FB. Avoidance reactions of domestic dogs to unfamiliar male and female humans in a kennel setting. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1986; 15: 261-266 https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(86)90096-1
  12. Lucidi P, N B, Panunzi M, Villa PD, Mattioli M. Ethotest: A new model to identify (shelter) dogs? skills as service animals or adoptable pets. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005; 95: 103-122 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.006
  13. Murphy JA. Describing categories of temperament in potential guide dogs for the blind. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998; 58: 163-178 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00047-6
  14. Netto WJ, Planta DJU. Behavioural testing for aggression in the domestic dog. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997; 52: 243-263 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01126-4
  15. Notari L, Goodwin D. A survey of behavioural characteristics of pure-bred dogs in Italy. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2007; 103: 118-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.03.018
  16. Reisner IR. Differential diagnosis and management of humandirected aggression in dogs. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2003; 33: 303-320 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-5616(02)00132-8
  17. Ruefenacht S, Gebhardt-Henrich S, Miyake T, Gaillard C. A behaviour test on German Shepherd dogs: heritability of seven different traits. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002; 79: 113-132 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00134-X
  18. Schaffer CB, Phillips J. The Tuskegee Behavior Test for Selecting Therapy Dogs. Tuskegee, AL, USA.: Tuskegee University. 1993
  19. Serpell JA, Hsu Y. Development and validation of a novel method for evaluating behavior and temperament in guide dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001; 72: 347-364 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00210-0
  20. Simpson BS. Canine communication. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997; 27: 445-464
  21. Slabbert JM, Odendaal JSJ. Early prediction of adult police dog efficiency- a longitudinal study. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1999; 64: 269-288 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00038-6
  22. Svartberg K. Shyness-boldness predicts performance in working dogs. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2002; 79: 157-174 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00120-X
  23. Taylor KD, Mills DS, The development and assessment of temperament tests for adult companion dogs, J Vet Behav 2006;1: 94-108 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2006.09.002
  24. Topal J, Miklosi A, Csanyi V, Doka A. Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): a new application of Ainsworth's (1969) Strange Situation Test. J Comp Psychol 1998; 112: 219-229 https://doi.org/10.1037/0735-7036.112.3.219
  25. van den Berg L, Schilder MBH, Knol BW. Behavior Genetics of Canine Aggression: Behavioral Phenotyping of Golden Retrievers by Means of an Aggression Test. Behav Genet 2003; 33: 469-483 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025714431089
  26. van der Borg JAM, Netto W, Planta D. Behavioural testing of dogs in animal shelters to predict problem behaviour. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1991; 32: 237-251 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80047-4
  27. Weiss E, Greenberg G. Service dog selection tests: Effectiveness for dogs from animal shelters. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997; 53: 297-308 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01176-8
  28. Wells DL, Hepper PG. Male and female dogs respond differently to men and women. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1999; 61: 341-349 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00202-0
  29. Wilsson E, Sundgren PE. The use of a behaviour test for selection of dogs for service and breeding. II. Heritability for tested parameters and effect of selection based on service dog characteristics. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1997; 54: 235-241 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01175-6
  30. Wright JC. Severe attacks by dogs: characteristics of the dogs, the victims, and the attack settings. Public Health Rep 1985; 100: 55