정보관리학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for information Management)

  • 제26권2호
  • /
  • Pages.65-82
  • /
  • 2009
  • /
  • 1013-0799(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2586-2073(eISSN)
한국정보관리학회 (Korean Society for Information Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학 수업에서 소셜 북마킹의 활용: 학생 인식 및 행태를 중심으로

Social Bookmarking Use in University Courses: Student Perceptions and Behaviors

  • Park, Ok-Nam (School of Library and Information Services, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Jung, Young-Sook (Institute of Distance Education, Korea National Open University)
  • 발행 : 2009.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구에서는 대학강좌에서 학생들의 소셜 북마킹 도구에 대한 인식 및 사용 행태를 분석하였다. 소셜 북마킹의 가치에 대한 최근 활발한 논의에도 불구하고 실제 이용자들이 어떻게 소셜 북마킹을 사용하는가에 대해서는 알려진 바가 많지 않다. 본 연구는 수업에서 학생들의 소셜 북마킹 도구인 딜리셔스 사용 행태와 인식을 바탕으로 소셜 북마킹이 제시하는 가치들이 실제에서 어떻게 나타나는지를 조사하였다. 학생들은 태깅, 기술, 네트워크의 기능을 소극적으로 사용하고 있었다. 이용자는 여전히 개인 정보 수집 및 관리의 도구로써 소셜 북마킹을 사용하고 있었으며, 소셜 북마킹 도구는 정보의 사용 및 재사용성은 향상시키고 있었으나 소셜 북마킹 도구가 지향하는 협력기반 정보공유, 협력기반 커뮤니티 구축 및 도메인 검색의 가치는 충분히 실현되지 못하고 있는 것으로 나타났다.

This exploratory study describes the social bookmarking perceptions and behaviors of students in university courses. Although an emerging discussion regarding the value of social bookmarking tools exists, how users adopt tools in practice is not well known. Students were asked to utilize the bookmarking tool del.icio.us to store information relating to course projects. They were also asked to comment how they employed del.icio.us for course projects. The study analyzed student perceptions and behaviors when using social bookmarking tools for university coursework. The study noted that the use of tags, notes, and networking within these social bookmarking tools remained less active and social bookmarking services in Web 2.0 as shared collaboration, shared communities, and vertical search were less present. Utilizing social bookmarking tools to facilitate personal information management includes the activities of information use, information re-use, and mobility.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abbitt, J. 2009. Evaluating the implementation of a social bookmarking activity for an undergraduate course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(1): 83-101
  2. Ajjan, H. and Hartshorne, R. 2008. Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11: 71-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.05.002
  3. Alexander, B. 2006. A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning. Educause Review, 41(2): 32-44
  4. Boulos, M. and Wheelert, St. 2007. The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 24: 2-23 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x
  5. Breeding, M. 2006. Web 2.0 Let's get to Web 1.0 first. Computers in Libraries, 26(5): 30-33
  6. Bruce, H, William, J. and Susan D. 2004. Information Behaviour that Keeps Found Things Found. Information Research, 10(1). [cited 2009. 5.13].
  7. Collis, B. and Moonen, J. 2008. Web 2.0 tools and processes in higher education: quality perspectives. Educational Media International, 45(2): 93-106 https://doi.org/10.1080/09523980802107179
  8. Coutinho, C. and Bottentuit Junior, J. 2008. Using social bookmarking to enhance cooperation/collaboration in a teacher education program. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educaitonal Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2008 (pp.2551-2556). Chesapeake, VA: AACE
  9. Gooding, J. 2008. Web 2.0: a vehicle for transforming education. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 4(2): 44-53
  10. Gordon-Murnane, L. 2006. Social bookmarking, folksonomies, and Web 2.0 tools. Searcher, 14(6): 26-38
  11. Harasim, L. 2000. Shift happens online education as a new paradigm in learning. Internet and Higher Education, 3: 41-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00032-4
  12. Harris, C. 2009. The next big thing-What's next for social bookmarking? School Library Journal. 55(2): 32-37
  13. Hong, H., Kim, S. and Cha, M. 2008. The analysis of leaners and teachers for University 2.0 as learning tools, Educational Technology Research. 24(4): 1-26
  14. Krause, B., Hotho, A. and Stumme, G. 2008. A comparison of social bookmarking with traditional search, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 101-113 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7_12
  15. Kroski, E. 2006. The Hype and the Hullabaloo of Web 2.0. [cited 2009.5.13].
  16. Lancaster, F.W. 1998. Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. Champaign: University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science. 2nd ed
  17. Miles, MB & Huberman, AM. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
  18. Millen, D., Whittaker, S., and Feinberg, J. 2007. Social bookmarking and exploratory search. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Limerick, Ireland, 24-28 September 2007, 21-40
  19. Morrison, J. 2008. Tagging and searching: Search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web. Information Processing and Management, 44: 1562-1579 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.12.010
  20. Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaier, M., Dosinger, G., Tochtermann, K. 2007. The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1): 87-107 https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLT.2007.012368
  21. Rosen, D. and Nelson, C. 2008. Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25: 211-225 https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802370997