Enhanced Robust Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio

  • Received : 2008.10.05
  • Published : 2009.04.30

Abstract

As wireless spectrum resources become more scarce while some portions of frequency bands suffer from low utilization, the design of cognitive radio (CR) has recently been urged, which allows opportunistic usage of licensed bands for secondary users without interference with primary users. Spectrum sensing is fundamental for a secondary user to find a specific available spectrum hole. Cooperative spectrum sensing is more accurate and more widely used since it obtains helpful reports from nodes in different locations. However, if some nodes are compromised and report false sensing data to the fusion center on purpose, the accuracy of decisions made by the fusion center can be heavily impaired. Weighted sequential probability ratio test (WSPRT), based on a credit evaluation system to restrict damage caused by malicious nodes, was proposed to address such a spectrum sensing data falsification (SSDF) attack at the price of introducing four times more sampling numbers. In this paper, we propose two new schemes, named enhanced weighted sequential probability ratio test (EWSPRT) and enhanced weighted sequential zero/one test (EWSZOT), which are robust against SSDF attack. By incorporating a new weight module and a new test module, both schemes have much less sampling numbers than WSPRT. Simulation results show that when holding comparable error rates, the numbers of EWSPRT and EWSZOT are 40% and 75% lower than WSPRT, respectively. We also provide theoretical analysis models to support the performance improvement estimates of the new schemes.

Keywords

References

  1. FCC, 'ET Docket No 03-222: Notice of proposed rule making and order,' Dec. 2003
  2. Q. H. Mahmoud, Cognitive Networks Towards Self-Aware Networks, John Wiley & Sons, 2007
  3. C. Mathur and K. Subbalakshmi, 'Digital signatures for centralized DSA networks,' in Proc. IEEE CCNC, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1109/CCNC.2007.209
  4. A. Sahai, N. Hoven and R. Tandra, "Some fundamental limits in cognitive radio," in Proc. Alleton Conf. on Commun., Control and Computing, Oct. 2004
  5. H. Tang, "Some physical layer issues of wide-band cognitive radio system," in Proc. IEEE DySPAN, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1109/DYSPAN.2005.1542630
  6. R. Chen and J.-M. Park, "Toward secure distributed spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks," in Proc. DSA workshop, Sept. 2006
  7. A. Pandharipande, J.-M. Kim, D. Mazzarese, and B. Ji, "IEEE P802.22 wireless RANs: Technology proposal package for IEEE 802.22." [Online]. Available: http://www.ieee802.org/22/, Nov. 2005
  8. L. Lu, S.Y. Chang, J. Zhang, and L. Qian,"IT technology proposal clarifications for IEEE 802.22 WRAN systems." [Online]. Available: http://www.ieee802.org/22/, Mar 2006
  9. B. K. Ghosh, Sequential Tests of Statistical Hypotheses, Addison-Wesley,1970
  10. R. Chen, J.-M. Park, and Kaigui Bian, "Robust distributed spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2008.251
  11. S. M. Kay, Fundamentals of Statistical Signal Processing: Detection Theory, Prentice-Hall, 1998
  12. P. K. Varshney, Distributed Detection and Data Fusion, Springer-Verlag New York, 1997
  13. C. Bettstetter, G. Resta, and P. Santi, "The node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model for wireless ad hoc networks," IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 2, no. 3, July–Sept. 2003 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMC.2003.1233531
  14. T. S. Rappaport,Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, Prentice Hall, 1996