불임지원정책

Public Funding for Assisted Reproductive Technology

  • 황정혜 (한양대학교 의과대학 산부인과학교실) ;
  • 민응기 (동국대학교 의과대학 산부인과학교실)
  • Hwang, Jung-Hye (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hanyang University, College of Medicine) ;
  • Min, Eung-Gi (Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dongguk University, College of Medicine)
  • 발행 : 2009.12.30

초록

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Nachtigall RD, International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril 2006; 85: 871-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.066
  2. McDonald P. Low fertility and the state: The efficacy of policy. Population and Development Review 2006; 32(3): 485-510 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2006.00134.x
  3. Gunnell DJ, Ewings P. Infertility prevalence, needs assessment and purchasing. Journal of Public Health Medicine 1994; 16: 29-36
  4. Adashi EY, et al. (2000). Public perception on infertility and its treatment: An international survey. The Bertarelli Foundation Scientific Board. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 15(2): 330-4 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/15.2.330
  5. UNFPA, State of world population 2009 Facing a changing world: women, population and climate. 2009; 1: 80-2. (http://www.unfpa.org/public/media_resources/swp09)
  6. Caldwell J, Caldwell P, McDonald P. Policy responses to low fertility and its consequences: A global survey. Journal of Population Research 2002; 19(1): 1-24 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03031966
  7. 윤태영, 황정혜, 한동운. 2005년 불임부부지원사업 구축 방안 보고서. 보건복지가족부. 2006. Mar
  8. 최영민, 민응기, 황정혜, 이정렬, 이동률, 윤태기. 2008년 불임부부지원사업 보고서, 보건복지가족부. 2009. Aug
  9. 2006. Assisted reproductive technology success rates. National summary and fertility clinic reports. Section 1. overview. 14-7.(http://www.cdc.gov/art/ART2006/508PDF/2006ART.pdf)
  10. Andersen AN, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Ferraretti AP, Kupka MS, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005:results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod 2009; 1(1): 1-21
  11. Katz P, Nachtigall R, Showstack J. The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies. Nat Cell Biol 2002 Oct; 4 Suppl: s29-32
  12. IFFS Surveillance 2007: a survey of the current status of assisted reproductive technology procedures around the world. Fertil Steril 2007; 87: 4(S8) (Supplement 1)
  13. Sorenson C. IVF/ART funding and reimbursement. Euro Observer 2006; 8(4): 6-7
  14. Bundesverband Reproduktionsmedizinischer Zentren Deutschlands. e.V. (BRZ), 2002. www.repromed.de/europa
  15. Mladovsky P. ART treatment in the EU: IVF and reproductive tourism. EuroObserver 2006; 8(4): 5
  16. Blyth EFA. Reproductive tourism: A price worth paying for reproductive autonomy? Critical Social Policy 2005; 25(1):91-114 https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018305048969
  17. O'Donnell C, Manché M, Kingsland C, Haddad N, Brickwood P. NHS funded fertility treatment - a national service in name only? Human Fertility 2005; 8(4): 217-24 https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270500089817
  18. Gerris J. Single embryo transfer and IVF/ICSI outcome: a balanced appraisal. Hum Reprod Update 2005; 11: 105-1 https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmh049
  19. Bergh C. Single embryo transfer: a mini-review. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 323-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh744
  20. Van Landuyt L, Verheyen G, Tournaye H, et al. New Belgian embryo transfer policy leads to sharp decrease in multiple pregnancy rate. Reprod Biomed Online 2006; 13: 765-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61022-X
  21. Felberbaum RE. Multiple pregnancies after assisted reproduction: international comparison. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 15 Suppl 3: 53-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62252-3
  22. Benagiano G, Gianaroli L. The new Italian IVF legistlation. Reprod Biomed Online 2004; 9: 117-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)62118-9
  23. Karlström PO, Bergh C. Reducing the number of embryos transferred in Sweden-impact on delivery and multiple birth rates. Hum Reprod 2007 Aug; 22(8): 2202-7
  24. Tiitinen A, Gissler M. Effect of in vitro fertilization practices on multiple pregnancy rates in Finland. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 1689-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.05.090
  25. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice, Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Fertil Steril 2008; 90: S163-4
  26. Mol BJ, Bonsel GJ, Collins JA, Wiegerinck M, Van Der Veen F, Bossuyt PM. Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertility and Sterility 2001; 73: 748-54
  27. Legro RS, Shakleford DP, Moessner JM, Gnatuk CL, Dodson WC. ART in women 40 and over. Is it worth it? The Journal of Reproductive Medicine 1997; 42(2): 76-82
  28. Braude P. One Child at a Time: Reducing Multiple Births after IVF. Report of the expert group on multiple births after IVF. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority October 2006
  29. Boggio A. Italy enacts new law on medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2005; 20(5): 1153-7 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh871
  30. Regulating assisted reproduction in Italy: a 5-year assessment. Boggio A, Corbellini G. Hum Fertil (Camb) 2009 Jun; 12(2): 81-8 https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270902849719
  31. Shanner L, Nisker J. Bioethics for clinicians: 26. Assisted reproductive technologies. CMAJ 2001; 164 (11); 1589-94
  32. Pennings G. (2004). Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(12): 2689-94 https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh486